|
POST
|
Hi @MikeMillerGIS - Thanks for this. I tried using this tool, and then discovered another item/question. Running the toolbox errored indicating there was a domain missing in the target UN schema. The domain name was AP_Domain_Networks -- which is present in the asset package but not the UN database created by stage utility network/apply asset package. I had never noticed this, but it seems the only domains present in the UN database are those actually assigned to fields. Is there a step I'm missing to move all other domains (including AP_* domains) from the asset package to the new UN database? (Sorry again for the newbie question) Thx, Ed
... View more
01-20-2026
11:09 AM
|
0
|
4
|
1037
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for the reply. The vertices and all other geometry are within the bounds of the ServiceTerritory. Ed
... View more
01-19-2026
11:54 AM
|
0
|
0
|
739
|
|
POST
|
I’ve been trying to track this one down for a while and I’m stumped. Any suggestions would be *greatly* appreciated. The error I’m getting is this when attempting to move or delete a vertex on a line feature in the PipelineLine feature class : We’ve all seen this, or some variation over the years. We try to add a feature whose geometry is outside the defined feature class extent and Arc barks at us. This one *seems* to be different. Here are my steps. I load data into an asset package FGDB based on the UPDM model. Points, lines and annotation. I can modify line geometries in the asset package to my heart’s content. No errors. I then a) Stage Utility Network in a new file geodatabase, b) Apply Asset Package to this new UN database from my asset package, and c) append feature classes from the asset package to the UN database. I’m to a point where there a very few dirty areas, but when editing in the UN geodatabase I consistently get the “Modify vertices failed” error on any line feature. I’ve verified that the spatial references in the asset package and UN db are identical. I’ve also taken these steps: Re-built the spatial index on the PipelineLine feature class. Re-calculated the spatial extent of the PipelineLine class. Note that I can delete a line and create a new line at the same location without error. I can also create, move and delete point features without error. Again, any thoughts on this would be much appreciated. Ed
... View more
01-19-2026
08:27 AM
|
0
|
3
|
777
|
|
POST
|
oh... is this possibly due to a bug I saw referenced in another post that says associations can only be imported *after* topology has been enabled?
... View more
01-15-2026
01:34 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1101
|
|
POST
|
All - Trying to import am trying to import associations from an asset package and consistently get the error below. When I Google the error it says there is a related bug, but that seems to be for server and I'm working in an FGDB. The associations were exported into a CSV from the C_Associations table in my Asset package and follow conventions in the UPDM sample database. A small sample from this CSV is attached. Any suggestions would, as always, be much appreciated. Thx, Ed
... View more
01-15-2026
01:01 PM
|
0
|
8
|
1124
|
|
POST
|
Worked as described. Thanks! Also found that anno expressions don't seems to work in JScript -- but they do in Arcade, so am going to make life simple(r) and stick with Arcade. Ed
... View more
01-07-2026
12:34 PM
|
1
|
0
|
896
|
|
POST
|
Ok. Thanks. Will give the GlobalID a try. Fingers crossed. Ed
... View more
01-04-2026
05:14 PM
|
1
|
0
|
979
|
|
POST
|
Hi - So, I added to a UPDM asset package an annotation class that has a relationship as follows: Origin class: PipelineJunction Origin Primary Key: OBJECTID (ObjectID) Destination class: SVT_Order_Anno Destination Foreign Key: FeatureID (Long) Running "Apply Asset Package" results in the error in the subject (when I remove the relationship the GP tool works without error). I *thought* an ObjectID had a data type of "Long" - but apparently not. Any suggestions on how to resolve this would be much appreciated. Thx, Ed
... View more
01-04-2026
03:07 PM
|
0
|
4
|
1026
|
|
POST
|
Yep. Thx. That seemed to have resolved it. Not sure why Pro would assume a Min value of 1 if the configured Min and Max values were null, but it appears to. Anyway, I'll make sure relationships have valid Min and Max values assigned - and that will be my path forward. Much appreciated. Ed
... View more
12-23-2025
05:49 AM
|
0
|
0
|
806
|
|
POST
|
Hi - I'm creating valves in a UPDM UN database and get the following error about there being no related valve inspection records present. (Valve inspection info is kept in another system and will not be included in the UN database). But when I try to change the relationship multiplicity (below) it looks like no Min and Max values are set. Any clue on what I am missing would be much appreciated. Thx, Ed
... View more
12-22-2025
09:13 AM
|
0
|
2
|
873
|
|
POST
|
Perfect! Makes sense and works as advertised. Thanks, Mike!
... View more
12-18-2025
05:16 AM
|
0
|
0
|
687
|
|
POST
|
Sorry to ask another newbie question, but I'm stuck on this. I added new asset group/asset types to the PipelineDevice class. I was then able to add the new group/types to the Cathodic Protection tier definition. This was great. Then I went to add the asset group/types to the Isolation tier definition. However, this time the new asset group/types were not available to add (below). Any clues on what I'm missing here would be much appreciated. Thx, Ed
... View more
12-17-2025
05:55 PM
|
0
|
2
|
724
|
|
POST
|
Hi J - Thanks for the comment. I'm not sure that using Test Points as subnetwork controllers will actually be a problem for us. We have them connected to test lead wires and service pipes in our network. And initial testing in at least one CP zone shows expected results. I only asked because, as you mentioned, test points don't 'control' anything as do other subnetwork controllers and wanted to make sure I understood the model correctly. Ed
... View more
12-17-2025
02:29 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1124
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 05-14-2026 07:31 AM | |
| 1 | 05-11-2026 02:55 PM | |
| 1 | 01-07-2026 12:34 PM | |
| 1 | 01-04-2026 05:14 PM | |
| 1 | 12-17-2025 07:45 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Saturday
|