Latest Contributions by EdwardBlair

‎02-23-2026

Hi @DamienPyne - It seems like enabling "eventing" might enable the responsiveness to device status changes we now see with ArcFM Feeder Manager (in 10.x) . But it also seems there are pros and cons to this. Have you purposefully avoided enabling "eventing"? Thx, Ed

‎02-23-2026

Well... that's what we would want. Mike Miller stated that what we see is expected behavior *in a version with eventing off*. Is it possible that you are performing the update subnetwork in SDE.Default? Or that you have eventing enabled? Thanks for the reply!

‎02-23-2026

Mike - Thanks for the explanation. As you mentioned, in our experience (so far) the subnetwork trace returns expected results. Unfortunately this is also, at least initially, another source of confusion. I've got a trace telling me one thing and subnetwork name values telling me another. Ed

‎02-22-2026

This is "as expected"? Really?? Pretty confusing. I'll try the IsConnected. Thanks much Damien for the reply. Ed

‎02-18-2026

Hi Lynn - I *am* running Update Subnetwork in a version. I'll give the post and update in Default a try. Thanks for the suggestion! E

‎02-18-2026

Hi - Here's the utility network scenario: I open a fuse protecting a single phase tap on feeder ABC123. I validate and save the edit, stop editing an update the subnetwork for ABC123. The features I de-energized by opening the fuse still have a subnetwork name of ABC123, even though they are currently not part of any feeder. What am I missing here? Or what other steps do I need to take to have the de-energized features be assigned a subnetwork of 'Unknown'. Thanks in advance for any info. Ed

‎02-18-2026

The UPDM same data has a single regulator in its stations, but what if, in fact, there are actually distinct "operator" and "monitor" regulators along a given line? Is there a benefit to representing both of these pieces of equipment as devices in the model? Thx in advance for any feedback, Ed

‎01-22-2026

Perfect! Thank you. Just what I was looking for.

‎01-22-2026

I understand the downside of include *many* lines in an aggregated subnetwork line. But, and sorry to be thick here, I just don't see how the asset groups/asset types that *are* included in the aggregated subnetwork line are defined. I *do* see in the subnetwork tier definition the devices to be included, but not the lines to be aggregated.

‎01-22-2026

I can see that. Is this controllable in any way, or is that just the way it works?

‎01-22-2026

I'm building CP subnetworks and noticed that the service lines (and CP wires) have a cpsubnetwork name assigned, but are not included in the subnetwork line geometry. Is this by design? Is there some configuration to the "Update Subnetwork" GP tool that controls this? I'm not saying this is necessarily a bad thing. I'd just like to understand it. Thx, Ed

‎01-21-2026

I found it! My map projection matches the data that I am editing. I had checked this multiple times. HOWEVER, I had several other projections in my Favorites list that were *far* from my current map project. Once I removed these Favorites I was able to update vertices. Holy cow! I don't know why the editor would be looking at the Favorites rather than the assigned projection, but apparently it was. Ed

‎01-20-2026

Thank you! That worked.

‎01-20-2026

Here's the input. Error is below at the bottom.

‎01-20-2026

Hi @MikeMillerGIS - Thanks for this. I tried using this tool, and then discovered another item/question. Running the toolbox errored indicating there was a domain missing in the target UN schema. The domain name was AP_Domain_Networks -- which is present in the asset package but not the UN database created by stage utility network/apply asset package. I had never noticed this, but it seems the only domains present in the UN database are those actually assigned to fields. Is there a step I'm missing to move all other domains (including AP_* domains) from the asset package to the new UN database? (Sorry again for the newbie question) Thx, Ed

Online Status	Online
Date Last Visited	Tuesday

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by EdwardBlair

Re: Update subnetwork and de-energized equipment

Re: Update subnetwork and de-energized equipment

Re: Update subnetwork and de-energized equipment

Re: Update subnetwork and de-energized equipment

Re: Update subnetwork and de-energized equipment

Update subnetwork and de-energized equipment

Operator and monitor regulators in a station

Re: CP subnetwork lines exclude services and CP wire

Re: CP subnetwork lines exclude services and CP wire

Re: CP subnetwork lines exclude services and CP wire

CP subnetwork lines exclude services and CP wire

Re: Move Edge Vertex Fails in Utility Network Database

Re: Import Associations tool fails with "Invalid Value for ASSOCIATIONTYPE"

Re: Import Associations tool fails with "Invalid Value for ASSOCIATIONTYPE"

Re: Import Associations tool fails with "Invalid Value for ASSOCIATIONTYPE"

Duplicating ConductorDetail rows on a Split

Cross Bores in the UPDM

Re: Apply Asset Package errors with "OID-based rel...

Re: Apply Asset Package errors with "OID-based rel...

Re: Gas CP Subnetwork Controllers