Latest Contributions by EvanThoms

And I can use conda to re-create the clone of arcgispro-py3 that is being remembered, add that path to proenv.txt, and the Package Manage will open pointing to that environment, but I still cannot switch to another environment in Pro. ... View more

When the contents of %localappdata%\ESRI\conda\envs\proenv.txt is C:\ArcGIS\Pro\bin\Python\envs\arcgispro-py3 the Python Command Prompt opens as expected: (arcgispro-py3) C:\ArcGIS\Pro\bin\Python\envs\arcgispro-py3> But I can't switch to that in Pro; that's when Pro churns.   ... View more

That's right, I don't have admin rights. I would need help from IT to uninstall or do a repair. I can use conda. I deleted the other environments using conda. ... View more

Yeah, the animation drives me crazy. Thomas's split example is good. I also don't like the way popups, tables, and other elements fade in and out. ... View more

Those are just a few examples, the domain includes many many more values, including "Kaf". In that case, I could have used $feature.Unit == lith rather than Find. I just found Find under the Text functions and thought it was most appropriate.  I still wonder what will happen if you create a new field and populate it with the expression and draw you map on that field. I could try that, but of course that's the first thing listed as a situation you can avoid by using Arcade!  ... View more

That works a bit better. If I search on the same lithology term as the one appearing in the edit box, the classes (usually) get assigned to the renderer. But, again, when I search for a different term; that I know exists after querying a nearby polygon, the test fails and the symbology is as first described. I tried searching only one field and the results were the same which suggests the problem has little to do with searching eight. Zooming in or being out at a small scale seems to have no effect. The test only works when I am searching for the lithology in the edit box.  Note that, like in my first post, when the style is not updated correctly, the polygons associated with the term for which I am searching are being symbolized differently than the 'not found' class, but they are appearing with the symbol for  'Other' and the count is 0.  I had some success yesterday with filters and group filters, so I think will move off this Arcade track for now. From the original question, some Unit value examples are Tmv, PzPxqs, Qs, Kkg. ... View more

Xander, thanks for taking a look.  Right, "KAF" appears no where in that field. I know I am looking for text that should be found in the field.  Here's a bit more. With another layer, again of geology polygons, I set up the expression below to find lithology terms in any of 8 fields in which they could possibly occur: var lithFlds = [$feature["MAJOR1"], $feature["MAJOR2"],- $feature["MAJOR3"], $feature["MINOR1"], $feature["MINOR2"], - $feature["MINOR3"], $feature["MINOR4"], $feature["MINOR5"]] var lith = 'Sandstone' for(var k in lithFlds){ if (Find(lith, lithFlds )>-1){ return lith; } else { return "not found"; } } When I put this in to the online AGOL expression builder and run test, it works only when one of the Globals included has the lith value displayed when I click on the pencil icon to the right of it I don't know for sure what those values indicate but my guess is they represent the values that would be returned from the feature that is in the center of the current extent over at the map or at least some kind of sampling of the feature layer? Ah, wait, I see I can edit that value. What's the purpose of this? Despite the fact that the test runs successfully, when I save the expression and back out of the dialog and go back to the map, the class symbology is as I first described.  When I search for a lithology term that does not appear in any of those edit boxes, the test fails. And finally, I tried this expression out in Pro on the same feature layer and it basically timed out trying to search all of the records. I had to shut it down. Maybe I am up against some kind of record limit? The feature layer has some 300k rows. ... View more

Neil, Thanks, yes, those are similar scenarios. I was starting to think of something like what you suggest. I was imagining a giant dummy polygon that covered my area so that I could have a hosted feature layer just to have access to a popup, but that's as far as got. Might look at this more in a few days. ... View more

Yes! metadata and data are too widely separated. Opening up an "item description" takes a long time and when you get there, it's the full record and a separate window. There should be quickly accessed context-menu / hover tips / popups, for example, that describe the field and the data as described in the metadata. ... View more

Ok, thanks. I figured the only way was through ArcObjects.  ... View more