Hi,
I just want explanation and discussion.
When do we use such configuration like the picture below ? Are they different geodatabases or single geodatabase but split into 2 databases ?
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
For which configuration?
If you have a need for a DEV / STAGE / PROD enterprise geodatabases, then you would create a new SID for each one.
You could have multiple data schemas in the same Oracle SID, i.e. GIS / WATER / SEWER / TRANS / etc.
That used to be possible, but we do not support / recommend this approach. It was the user-schema geodatabase option.
That looks like the suggested model. 1 Oracle database (instance) with 1 SDE schema. You can have multiple data owner or other schemas in the same Oracle geodatabase.
Hi George,
What might be the case for using this configuration ? I need a little elaboration...
thanks
For which configuration?
If you have a need for a DEV / STAGE / PROD enterprise geodatabases, then you would create a new SID for each one.
You could have multiple data schemas in the same Oracle SID, i.e. GIS / WATER / SEWER / TRANS / etc.
I see. Thanks George. That really open my mind.
I was under impression that the configuration showed in the original pict i posted was for creating 1 geodatabase that incorporating 2 databases (2 databases that make up 1 geodatabase). I was using RAID analogy in interpreting the picture, ie : multiple HDDs combines into 1 logical HDD.
Thanks for clearing up.
That used to be possible, but we do not support / recommend this approach. It was the user-schema geodatabase option.