When editor tracking is enabled on both a parent and related child object, should it be the case that when editing the parent object/table that the updated editor tracking should be reflected in the related table?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Should it? I would say no. Let's say I had a layer of utility poles, and related layers of the things attached to these poles. If I make a minor update to one of the pole's attributes or correct its position, I do not want this action to overwrite the "last edited by" information in all the related features.
I want to know who last edited a specific transformer, so I need to be assured that this isn't showing me who last edited something else that happens to be related to the transformer.
Should it? I would say no. Let's say I had a layer of utility poles, and related layers of the things attached to these poles. If I make a minor update to one of the pole's attributes or correct its position, I do not want this action to overwrite the "last edited by" information in all the related features.
I want to know who last edited a specific transformer, so I need to be assured that this isn't showing me who last edited something else that happens to be related to the transformer.
This makes good sense, thank you!
I should say, though, that if you're interested in finding out the last-edited element anywhere in the chain of related items, you could do that with Arcade. I do use this for a particular dataset for complaints and investigations, where a manager may want to see what the most recent edit was for a given complaint. The expression can return something like "Most recent edit: Violations table, Jun 21, 2022 10:24 AM".
I'm intrigued if you are willing to share more.
Already posted about it! Just had to track down the link.
thanks so much! This is a great write-up!