Hi there
The edge objects tabular line representation (without any actual line geometry) may be used to document e.g., individual fibers in a fiber cable. In this case the edge objects will be contained. You may say the edge object in this case inherits the geometry of the container.
Yeah I know - I could do a quick test, but asking here is quicker 😉 and might even bring knowledgeable input to me.
BR JD
Solved! Go to Solution.
Jens,
Yes the rules allow this, but I believe the issue will come down to locatability. Would that Edge be connected to with a From/To JJ association to a spatial feature?
see validate_locatability on
Jens,
Yes the rules allow this, but I believe the issue will come down to locatability. Would that Edge be connected to with a From/To JJ association to a spatial feature?
see validate_locatability on
Yes, an edge object can contain a domain line feature. A common example of this is that a conduit (Structure Edge Object), contained by a conduit system (Structure Line), can contain a Conductor (Electric Line). Mike's point on locatibility is important, so you'd either want your edge object to be contained in or connected to a spatial object.
You can find the full matrix of what is allowed for connectivity, attachment, and containment associations on this page: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/utility-network/feature-restrictions.htm .
Oh, yeah - the answer is obvious with your reply, Robert. You cleared my vision. Thanks.
And Mike - we're not immediately planning on connecting the edge object to any features in the map. The immediate objective is to group line features. But now that you've asked, I think I should ask Elvia about this. It would actually be obvious to connect this edge object to assembly features delineating it (using JJCA's).
Thank you guys for swift answers. See, got a lot more out of asking than looking myself 😉