This idea post is one of several individual ideas that I had grouped together on this original post: https://community.esri.com/ideas/15660-survey-123-vs-gocanvas?commentID=66800#comment-66800. Even though Survey 123 Connect has many of these capabilities that can be "programmed", there are other applications that have web-based form design similar to the Survey 123 web designer but that are easier to use in terms building in capabilities that can only be built in using S123 Connect. Scott Prindle requested that I post each enhancement individually. These enhancement requests are based on my experience using a web app called GoCanvas* (GC) for damage assessments.
Being able to set conditions to trigger other fields or even other pages of questions to create a choose your own adventure style of field data collection is another capability that S123 Connect does have. Again, not available on the web design version. GC has this ability in their web designer. It is easy to even use a combination of multiple different fields from different areas of the form to create and/or to trigger other fields or pages. The screenshot below is an example of that from GC:
*GoCanvas is just what we use and is one of many similar field data collection platforms that, as far as I am concerned are easier to use than S123 Connect in a browser environment, automatically creates PDFs, integrates with cloud storage, and has email configuration options to automatically email specific people when a submission is complete.