Synchronizing Error to server 10.3.1

CarlosPorras · ‎09-24-2015

We are receiving an error while trying to sync updates from feature services on our 10.3.1 server. Is this an known issue? Have there been any solutions or work around implemented? The error is "Error Processing Server Request"

Thanks,

Carlos Porras

CarlosPorras · ‎09-25-2015

Clarification, the sync issue appears to happen when working with versioned data/feature services.

EdvinEriksson · ‎10-19-2015

Hi,

We get the same error message. However, the error remains even after having unregistered all feature classes and recreated the feature service.

Any thoughts on what we can do to resolve this error?

Thanks,

Edvin

DonKuehne · ‎10-19-2015

I am also getting the error… looks like a bug. It’s being evaluated.

CarlosPorras · ‎10-19-2015

Thanks Don. Here is the bug info I received from support:

"BUG-000089025-Unable to synchronize edits in ArcGIS for AutoCAD if a polyline layer exists in the referenced ArcGIS for Server 10.3.1 feature service"

EdvinEriksson · ‎10-21-2015

Do you think that a new service patch for SQL server could be the source of the error?

DonKuehne · ‎10-21-2015

Still diagnosing the issue, we’ve experienced it too. I think it is likely on our side.

JaromHlebasko · ‎10-29-2015

Are you able to delete features from within AutoCAD? The only time I get this server error is when I try to update or create features. If I delete features, I can successfully synchronize but when I try the other two, it gives me an error. My features services are set to have all capabilities enabled.

EdvinEriksson · ‎11-01-2015

HI Jarom,

We´re also able to synchronize when we have deleted features but not when we have added or edited features.

ChristoforosKatsaounis · ‎11-03-2015

Thank you for your inputs everyone.

As Don mentioned earlier this behavior seems to occur due to defect BUG-000089025 which is being evaluated. We should note that this issue was logged specifically to syncing updates from feature services which contain Polyline geometry.

I would be curious to hear if that is the case for everyone in this thread -that would be much appreciated to help us understand the underlying issue and narrow this down further.