Select to view content in your preferred language

Field Maps Offline Areas Transforms Hosted Feature Layers to WGS84

887
4
05-04-2021 06:28 AM
VinceE
by
Occasional Contributor II

I have field teams that frequently need to take map areas offline while using Field Maps to collect data. I have found that once a map is set up to be taken offline, the hosted feature layers within that are editable are converted to WGS84--meaning, after the collected field data is synced, and then exported to a File Geodatabase, the spatial reference for this data will be WGS84.

To be clear, these layers were originally published in our State Plane coordinate system (except the basemap, that's WGS84), and I do not have this same experience when using live syncing (NOT taking the maps offline). In cases where cell service is decent, and we don't need to set up maps as offline capable, the exported feature layers seems to maintain the original State Plane coordinate system that they started with when published.

Can anyone confirm that this is expected behavior, and/or if there is a workaround? My guess as to what is happening is that an offline device cannot manage complex coordinate system transformations on the fly, so everything is transformed into Web Mercator once a map is "offline enabled."

4 Replies
AdminWPZ
New Contributor III

I can't confirm that this is expected behaviour but it happens to my data too. I messed up a replica and now I have two versions of the data base with different coordinate systems that I need to merge.

I wonder if you're found a solution / workaround?


0 Kudos
VinceE
by
Occasional Contributor II

Never did unfortunately, just had to manage any data that was collected “offline” differently than the live stuff.

AdminWPZ
New Contributor III

That's a shame, it could be such a great tool. 

0 Kudos
VinceE
by
Occasional Contributor II

Agreed, Field Maps was mostly great, but the offline areas were ALWAYS touch and go when I had field teams using them in poor service areas, which made using them a real pain. I haven’t supported field teams in a little while, it’s a shame to hear the application still isn’t completely reliable.

edit: At the bottom of this page, there are still tons of links to folks experiencing issues creating offline areas, so looks like Esri still has some work to do.