POST
|
Hi @ValGaj - I finally (a year or more later!) got an opportunity to use your approach as python 1.8.4 is no longer available on AGOL notebook (as far as i am aware). It does work so thank you for providing this solution. To get it to work i have to clone all the layers first by cloning the initial map, then run the clone a second time on the webmap with the item_mapping setup correctly now i have the new IDs, then delete the first cloned map. This is considerably more code to achieve the same effect. I don't suppose you know of a simpler approach using this method?
... View more
07-02-2024
07:14 AM
|
0
|
1
|
999
|
IDEA
|
This has also been tested using python in notebook on AGOL with no luck using the Contingent Values toolset
... View more
05-29-2024
11:15 AM
|
0
|
0
|
160
|
POST
|
Hi Shane, Only tested on the new map viewer - if I open in classic would i lose the group layers? Many. Could be 200 layers Not on new small ones Will report back than on that. I dont want to manually recreate the map though for obvious reasons. thanks joe
... View more
03-05-2024
09:04 AM
|
0
|
2
|
701
|
POST
|
Has anyone else experienced reduced performance in existing MapViewer maps since the recent February 2024 update? Maps which had a lot of layers on but overall performed fine prior to the update, are now resulting in very slow speeds to load and render.
... View more
03-05-2024
07:26 AM
|
6
|
5
|
764
|
IDEA
|
Contingent Values can be used in FieldMaps however to get them working they need to be in feature layer that was published from ArcGIS Pro. This layer when duplicated loses its contingent values. This has been tested using 3 approaches: using a new item based on an existing layer in ArcGIS Online; making a copy in ArcGIS Online Assistant; making a copy using the clone_items() function in notebook. It would be helpful to make this possible so that a layer with a form (which are not editable in ArcGIS Pro) AND contingent values could be created without having to publish from Pro (and then re-create a complex form from scratch). It would be even better to be able to create layers from scratch with contingent values in them in ArcGIS Online without having to publish initially from Pro.
... View more
09-07-2023
06:36 AM
|
17
|
2
|
590
|
IDEA
|
Currently to find the map projections used in ArcGIS Online is really unclear. For a feature layer it is of less importance as they can be transformed, however tile layers can only be displayed on basemap in the correct projection. Also changing a basemap changes the projection. Neither the layer or the basemap show clearly what projection they are in. It would be really beneficial to simply display this in: the item details page on a basemap in the list of basemaps so you know what you are going to get In the corner of a Map in MapViewer so you know what projection you are looking at Ideally this would be in the EPSG code and the ESRI naming.
... View more
07-20-2023
02:52 AM
|
3
|
0
|
247
|
IDEA
|
This would also be highly beneficial to any consultancy with many projects. Categories would be a really useful way to sort out projects if there were more than a total of 200. If the 200 limit was was within each subcategory that would also work (for us anyway) : Projects:- 123 12345 Proejct 1 12346 Project 2 12347 Project 3 124 12400 Trees 12401 Fishes
... View more
07-17-2023
01:34 AM
|
0
|
0
|
335
|
IDEA
|
I agree - I would like it to allow the table to include all layers on a map without having to manually add each table you require. If a new layer is added to the map, this will default to show the table in the map. There should be an option to do this or specify individual tables if you want.
... View more
06-06-2023
04:23 AM
|
0
|
0
|
565
|
POST
|
I have managed to successfully produced a webmap from pro with a layer where contingent values work. The intention is for it to be a template that will be used in FieldMaps. When I have attempted to clone it (and all layers within the map) using clone_items() in a notebook on AGOL, the form seems to be retained for the layer but the contingent values no longer work. Is there away around this?
... View more
05-16-2023
11:07 AM
|
1
|
1
|
395
|
POST
|
Ah yes that will be it! Pro is using 2.0.1 and Online uses 1.8.4. I can work from that - thank you!
... View more
04-11-2023
07:21 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2480
|
POST
|
Thanks for the advice there - What I find is that if I run it through AGOL notebook it does actually create clones that are not linked to the original (this is what I want), and links to those clones though? Why does it give different results if run through Pro or on AGOL?
... View more
04-11-2023
01:04 AM
|
0
|
4
|
2490
|
POST
|
To add to the above - I tested it on the AGOL notebook (the prev one is run in a script in ArcGIS Pro) and it works as it should ie the map is now pointing towards the new cloned layers.
... View more
03-28-2023
06:13 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2551
|
POST
|
Hi, I have previously succeeded in running a python script (set up as a tool in ArcGIS pro) that cloned an app (in this case the attachment viewer) and all it content which was a map and the layers within the map. It previously functioned perfectly, however a change (earlier this year) has occurred where all the items are cloned (inc a new set of layers), however the layers in the map are still pointing back to the original layers. A diagram below explains: Current template: Orig App >Orig Map >Orig Layers What should happen after cloning: New App > New Map > New Layers What happens after cloning: New App > New Map > Orig Layers The line of script looks like this: appToClone = gis.content.get('xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx') layerList = [appToClone] clonedLyrs = gis.content.clone_items(layerList, folder=folderName, copy_data=False, search_existing_items=False) Any ideas why this is occurring? Many thanks Joe
... View more
03-28-2023
02:18 AM
|
0
|
9
|
2576
|
POST
|
Has this become available in 3.10 ? I am trying to trace lines (that have z values) but the z values are just comping up as zero still on 3.03.
... View more
03-05-2023
10:27 AM
|
0
|
0
|
286
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
6 | 03-05-2024 07:26 AM | |
1 | 05-16-2023 11:07 AM | |
17 | 09-07-2023 06:36 AM | |
3 | 07-20-2023 02:52 AM | |
3 | 09-03-2020 03:48 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
2 hours ago
|