POST
|
hi, Jim. I don't see the attachments that you mentioned. Would you be willing to repost with the attachments? Thank you!
... View more
12-04-2023
03:41 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1555
|
POST
|
Thank you, Susan. In theory, if I were wanting to keep my org as clean as possible, it would be OK for me to delete the item w/the time stamp since it is merely an archive and the original item has been updated. Or, is there a compelling reason for me to keep the automatically created "archive" item?
... View more
06-20-2022
08:18 PM
|
0
|
0
|
767
|
POST
|
I recently published a traditional ArcGIS Server map service from ArcGIS Pro. There was an existing service that I overwrote, but I utilized a different Pro project file for publishing. I received a message stating that the web layer successfully published. However, when I viewed the folder in Portal with the published map service (Map Image Layer), I could see the updated map service (Map Image Layer) as well as a new map service (Map Image Layer) with the same name, but with time/date stamp added. See attached screen capture. Publishing from ArcGIS Pro 2.9 Publishing to ArcGIS Enterprise 10.7.1 Data is sourced from an SDE GeoDB and the SDE connection is a valid data store within ArcGIS Server Manager. Does anyone have experience with this behavior? Any thoughts on what causes it? How big of an issue is it/Is it bad?
... View more
05-18-2022
04:02 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1009
|
POST
|
The LGIM is not as extensive as what it was in the past, but it's still a good starting point. Those feature datasets/feature classes that were a part of the original LGIM can for the most part be found in the individual solutions found in the Local Government Solutions. I have never had much success when working with XRay in the past, but I was finally about to successfully change the spatial reference of the LGIM that you referenced. I'd recommend giving that another shot. Something to consider as you are working through the data that exists within your new organization is whether that data should be user-managed or arcgis-managed. Here's a link to a white paper that gets into this conversation: User managed vs ArcGIS managed. I am in the process of identifying which of my existing data in SDE will be managed in AGOL/Portal and which will continue to be managed in SDE. It's a process, but my conversations with esri staff indicate that I'm on the right path.
... View more
06-11-2020
07:19 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1780
|
POST
|
Question for those of you who have been a part of a stormwater asset inventory. If you used sub-meter/sub-foot GPS receivers for the inventory, have you ever wished that you had used centimeter GPS receivers instead? If so, what was the need that the sub-meter/sub-foot units weren't able to meet? Thanks folks. Be well . . . Ray
... View more
06-11-2019
12:27 PM
|
0
|
1
|
637
|
POST
|
Eric, Hope this may be of some help. I went through a similar situation earlier this year and struggled with how best to pull down the schema and work with it in ArcMap/ArcCatalog. I have attached workflow documentation for being able to export the schema without having to use AGP or the Solutions Deployment Tool. Let me know if anything needs to be clarified. Be well . . . Ray
... View more
12-13-2018
01:08 PM
|
3
|
0
|
1428
|
POST
|
Howard, Thank you for the response. That did the trick. I was able to see the template change in Collector (and other locations that I used to interact with the Mobile Editor web map). Yay! I realize that there is more than 1 way to get from A to B, so I should've tried other avenues beyond AGP. I typically take care of schema/domain changes in Catalog, configure the editing template in Desktop and publish feature services on our own premise AGS. I looked at this project as an opportunity to embrace AGP for an implementation utilizing the solution deployment tool. It is a little confusing to see the documentation for configuring the solution (http://solutions.arcgis.com/water/help/hosted-stormwater-configuration/get-started/configure-solution.htm) state to use AGP, and then find out that feature template changes need to be made in AGOL and not AGP. If I could, I do have some follow up questions for you. When using the solutions deployment tool, is it necessary to change similar/shared domains for each individual feature? For example, is it necessary to change the values of the Owned By/Maintained By domain for each individual feature or can I change it one time similar to how I would do in SDE? If I can do it one time, similar to SDE, how can I access the domain list? Is there a workflow for doing this sort of task (updating domains, feature schema, and customizing the edit feature template) within ArcMap/ArcCatalog? My comfort level in those applications is exponentially higher than in AGP. I have attempted a similar workflow using Map & Catalog (download the fGeoDB from AGOL, add/remove items to/from a domain, add fields to a feature class, change the edit template, overwrite the AGOL hosted feature layer) that I would use for our own AGS hosted feature services, but I end up creating a parallel hosted feature layer in AGOL when I try to go down the overwrite existing service path. Thank you again for your assistance in getting past my initial issue with the edit feature template. I do appreciate it.
... View more
11-21-2018
01:04 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1380
|
POST
|
Howard, Thank you for the response, and your suggestions. I have modified the domain for Asset_Type_Stormwater_Line_Pipe, and have attached a screen capture of what it looks like. I then added the Stormwater Network (View) hosted feature to an empty map in ArcGIS Pro. Using the Manage Templates function from the Edit ribbon, I removed the domain types from the Pipe Asset Type so that the template values were consistent with the domain values. I wasn't certain if I should be making changes to the hosted feature layer from a new map, or to the hosted feature layer referenced in the Stormwater Mobile Editor web map (my belief is that it does not make a difference, but at this point I am attempting to eliminate any and all possibilities as to why I am having difficulty with this process), so I went ahead and added/opened the Stormwater Mobile Editor web map in ArcGIS Pro. I could see that the pipe asset types found in the manage templates pane of the Stormwater Mobile Editor web map were consistent with those values that I edited from the Stormwater Network (View) hosted feature layer in the new, empty web map that I referenced above. I would anticipate that being the case. My understanding is that the list of possible pipe types would be smaller since I edited both the domain and editing template. However, the editing template for the pipe feature layer did not reflect the domains nor the values of the editing template when I accessed the Stormwater Mobile Editor web map from ArcGIS Online, from Collector for ArcGIS, or from ArcGIS Pro. The pipe editing template in all three applications still showed all of the default pipe asset types instead of the ones that I had edited. Also, the OwnedBy and MaintainedBy fields did not reflect the domain value that I committed (I changed Our Agency to Blount County). This can be seen in the attached screen capture named. I did add a pipe feature in the Stormwater Mobile Editor web map from within ArcGIS Pro. I was able to see this added feature in both ArcGIS Online and in Collector. However, the editing template in both AGOL and Collector referenced all of the default pipe types, and the original OwnedBy & MaintainedBy domain values. I am still new to ArcGIS Pro, so I imagine that there is something that I am missing, but at this point I am uncertain what it may be, or where to look. Is there anything that you can see that I may be missing as I am attempting to localize this solution? Thank you . . . Ray
... View more
11-12-2018
08:55 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1380
|
POST
|
Greetings Dan, Have you had any luck with what you were wanting to accomplish? Thank you . . . Ray
... View more
11-02-2016
05:19 PM
|
0
|
0
|
284
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
3 | 12-13-2018 01:08 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
2 weeks ago
|