Latest Contributions by ShaunWalbridge

I'm working with some folks internally to identify which bug this correctly maps to, but wanted to let you know that the bug you've identified (BUG-000115963) is not related to the report provided within this post. That bug is specific to random raster ramps, which is not the case in a hypsometric tint ramp like the one listed here. We will respond with more information once it is gathered. For future reference, please refrain from at messaging a collection of people: choose the one or two people who are most appropriate (here, I would've picked Esri employees already involved in the issue), and wait for a response before trying to engage more individuals. This helps prevent duplicate efforts from our teams in triaging communications, and ultimately will make us more likely to address your concerns. Cheers, Shaun ... View more

I would appreciate a bug being logged on this, or sufficient detail for us to reproduce it in house. While the products and their registry keys should not interact, Python environments are a fairly special case. Why? Because once you create custom environments, they can be located anywhere on disk, and potentially map back to either Pro or Server or one of the other four products that also produce custom environments. In that case, mixing between environment types installed with different products can be problematic, because the versions won't align between those cases, and I suspect there is some interaction in that area at play here. ... View more

Thanks for the suggestion. Could you clarify what kinds of servers you need to access in this way? If they are ArcGIS Servers, the Python API today has a PKCS12 story that should work (it was added a few releases ago): https://developers.arcgis.com/python/latest/guide/working-with-different-authentication-schemes/#web-tier-authentication-secured-with-pki The package itself is really just one file (https://github.com/m-click/requests_pkcs12/blob/master/requests_pkcs12.py), which is about 150 lines if you strip off the tests. It might be easiest just to inline that if you do need direct access to a PKCS12 server outside of an ArcGIS server context, but am interested to hear if there are more nuances that aren't captured yet. Thanks, Shaun     ... View more

I realize I'm replying to a very old thread, but for the past year we've been packaging and hosting geopandas directly on the Esri channel, ensuring there is a version which is binary compatible with the rest of Pro. ... View more

@KevinGabelmanby coincidence, today is the day we flipped over the Pro 3.5 packages onto the main Esri channel. You should be able to upgrade to it, e.g. from the command line, with `conda upgrade --no-pin python`. ... View more

Hi @DarrenConly, just wanted to mention that with Pro 3.4+, we now include the `libmamba` solver with a much more modern Conda version (24.7.1) which is better at solves. You can now install polars from conda-forge with `conda install conda-forge::polars` and it should work. If it'd be useful to you, we could also build and host this on our channel, please make a request and I'd be happy to get that in our queue. ... View more

@AJRI see them all under the linked to https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/arcpy/functions/table-properties.htm, I believe that's where they are within the object hierarchy. ... View more

Seems like a reasonable request, we'll look into it. ... View more

@AlfredBaldenweckOK. I think in that case, you can do it with validation code to modify the state to only support a single checked value and uncheck the other values when one of the values has been altered.   After some internal polling,  we think that we've been able to produce a wide variety of Geoprocessing tools with different interfaces without an explicit radio option, and without this mapping onto a broader need it isn't something we currently intend to offer. I'll leave this open for now to see if it attracts attention more broadly, but workarounds are the best short term bet in any case. ... View more

@AlfredBaldenweckThanks for your suggestion. Could you see if the existing Multivalue controls described in the parameter controls documentation allow you to do what you're looking for? Those seem to map most closely and would allow you to avoid the dropdown. ... View more

@dbKlingdom Please log an issue with support for your issue—I looked through the codepaths that I see related to the upgrade and don't see anything that would trigger a rename to happen, but support should be able to suss out what differs between our setups. ... View more

@dbKlingdom @JTessier The intended design is that you do only have one clone, the upgrade interface should look like this with a button to click in order to start the upgrade: That should backup the environment and create a new one in the same place with the same name. If you're not seeing that behavior, I would consider it a bug. ... View more

@JTessier Got it. Custom environments can't be directly upgraded by the software upgrade process, because they weren't created by it (MSI files specify the files they have written, and those are the things they can change). To upgrade custom environments, follow the instructions provided here: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/arcpy/get-started/upgrade-an-environment.htm In most cases, it should be as simple as clicking the upgrade button within the UI, but it is possible to invoke from the command line or with a script as well. This process should migrate both custom installed conda and pip packages. ... View more

@JTessier the specific issue that @FakeName identified was fixed in Pro 3.3, which is if you had active things running against the environment that you're trying to upgrade it wouldn't correctly get upgraded and just leave you with the backup. It will now in that case fully restore the environment back to its original state, and the upgrade should work once those file handles are unlocked first. If you see specific issues with upgrading your custom environments, can you share details on what the failures are, and what kinds of packages are present in your environments? ... View more

Thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it contains insufficient information for us to act on. If you are receiving a specific error code from the software, please provide details on your workflow and what tool is failing, and create a general post rather than an idea. Thanks! 感谢您的提交。遗憾的是，它包含的信息不足以让我们采取行动。如果您从软件收到特定的错误代码，请提供有关您的工作流程和哪个工具失败的详细信息，并创建一般帖子而不是想法。 谢谢！ ... View more