Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Cancel
- Home
- :
- About JohnAlsup
JohnAlsup
Esri Regular Contributor
since
07-31-2014
Tuesday
234
Posts created
5
Kudos given
50
Solutions
121
Kudos received
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
My Ideas
(0 Idea Submissions)Latest Contributions by JohnAlsup
|
POST
|
Can I ask what the business purpose of this is? If it is for a user to see what conductors are mounted on a pole? Is it for some system to calculate pole load?
... View more
Tuesday
|
0
|
0
|
96
|
|
POST
|
In the Utility Network, using the Electric Foundation as a model, you would place a ElectricJunction feature, probably a MV Attachment Point on the line where each pole is located. Then create an attachment association between the ElectricJunction you created and the StructureJunction Pole feature. Then when you select your pole, you will see everything it is attached to, even if multiple circuits. If you want each wire associated to the pole, then you would need to create an Electric Junction feature placed on each wire.
... View more
|
1
|
0
|
162
|
|
POST
|
RDMBS replication for a UN would very difficult to configure. I doubt it would be successful. The Esri Solutions tool, Utility Data Management Support (UDMS) contains a tool named Export Reporting Data. This tool will copy data from a UN to an Enterprise Geodatabase and create views with joins to the associations table so you can build views, for example from devices to structures. These views can be setup one time and then you can execute Export Reporting Data daily replacing data in the target database without affecting the views. Then you are able to run SQL type queries against non-versioned data (as the versions are not copied out). The only drawback is that you cannot trace on this database. https://github.com/Esri/Utility-Data-Management-Support-Tools?tab=readme-ov-file https://esri.github.io/Utility-Data-Management-Support-Tools/docs/3.5/
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
1
|
0
|
184
|
|
POST
|
Are you using a D_Configuration table to define what the resulting UN should contain?
... View more
10-15-2025
05:16 AM
|
0
|
0
|
410
|
|
POST
|
You can also provide an extent to the Apply Asset Package to Geodatabase. You will probably get some incomplete subnetworks.
... View more
10-14-2025
05:17 AM
|
1
|
0
|
208
|
|
POST
|
Did you happen to enable the topology, then add an asset type to the existing domain?
... View more
10-09-2025
03:58 AM
|
0
|
0
|
289
|
|
POST
|
I would also like to know how this asset type was added to the UN? What steps.
... View more
10-07-2025
11:01 AM
|
0
|
2
|
314
|
|
POST
|
If you are modeling a balanced system (outside of north america typically) you will need to start with the Expanded model. We are releasing an essentials model for Balanced systems very soon.
... View more
10-04-2025
06:38 AM
|
1
|
0
|
218
|
|
POST
|
An attribute rule would be tough to get to work as an attribute rule runs on the service, not the client, so it would have no knowledge of what rows you have selected.
... View more
10-01-2025
02:14 PM
|
0
|
0
|
288
|
|
POST
|
Let's take an example. I have a pole, that pole has no related joint use records. I create my version and create a joint use record for this pole, and I also update the pole-class. Before I can post my version, some updates the pole, say height. Now, when I reconcile, I get a conflict on the pole and the new related record. When it's just one update like this, it's pretty easy to fix. However, when many things are updated and in the conflict list, it gets very complicated very quickly.
... View more
10-01-2025
06:15 AM
|
1
|
1
|
331
|
|
POST
|
You have three options, each with pros and cons. The StructureJunctionObject will increase the size of the associations table which will impact the time of enable topology and disable topology. There are other potential impacts to things like validate, export subnetwork to name a few. The geodatabase related table method avoids those issues, but introduces new issues. The relationship can lead to false or confusing conflicts and the user interface for geodatabase relationships leaves a bit to be desired. The third option is to make the jointuse table a related table only in the map, not using a geodatabase releationship class. This avoids the conflict issue and actually provides a better UI experience for the user. The draw back is you must manually create the record in the joint use table and copy and paste the GLOBALID from the pole to the joinuse record. This could be done with an addin.
... View more
10-01-2025
05:46 AM
|
1
|
5
|
340
|
|
POST
|
You cannot add classes to a utility network. You would need to add these as an Asset Group and Asset Type in either the <Domain Network> Device or Junction class.
... View more
08-09-2025
05:47 AM
|
0
|
0
|
322
|
|
POST
|
each row in the associations table will need key information populated, Association type (column 1) is one of them. If you create the associations using some migration process, you will probably want to run the tool "Sync the C Tables Asset Group/Type" which can be found in the UtilityDataManagementSupport toolbox before running Apply Asset Package. This will fix any missing data, other than association type and provide warnings for invalid data.
... View more
08-02-2025
05:31 AM
|
0
|
0
|
226
|
|
POST
|
My first question would be was the target a versioned Enterprise Database?
... View more
06-27-2025
07:07 AM
|
0
|
0
|
263
|
|
POST
|
The first option is to trace for only three phase equipment. This can be done by adding a Filter Barrier in the trace to make anything that does not contain all three phases a barrier. The second option is to add a network attribute, (don't try to make it inline) that indicates an object or feature is Mainline. Then you could modify your trace to add a traversability barrier that does not include this network attribute being true. But, this will require disabling the network topology to make that change.
... View more
06-24-2025
05:29 AM
|
0
|
1
|
546
|
My kudoed posts
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monday | |
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 10-14-2025 05:17 AM | |
| 1 | 10-04-2025 06:38 AM | |
| 1 | 10-01-2025 06:15 AM |
Activity Feed
- Posted Re: Migrating Pole–Conductor Relationships to Structural Associations on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. Tuesday
- Got a Kudo for Re: Migrating Pole–Conductor Relationships to Structural Associations. Monday
- Posted Re: Migrating Pole–Conductor Relationships to Structural Associations on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. Monday
- Got a Kudo for Utility Network Foundations: Removing from the solution. 3 weeks ago
- Got a Kudo for Re: Migrating UN from one geodatabase to another geodatabase using a different RDBMS. 3 weeks ago
- Posted Re: Migrating UN from one geodatabase to another geodatabase using a different RDBMS on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 3 weeks ago
- Got a Kudo for Re: Subset of Data to UN. 10-16-2025 06:02 AM
- Posted Re: Data Deleting When Applying Asset Package on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 10-15-2025 05:16 AM
- Posted Re: Subset of Data to UN on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 10-14-2025 05:17 AM
- Posted Re: Issue with Utility Network Topology Validation – Structure Junction Subtype Error on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 10-09-2025 03:58 AM
- Posted Re: Issue with Utility Network Topology Validation – Structure Junction Subtype Error on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 10-07-2025 11:01 AM
- Got a Kudo for Re: Essentials to Expanded Model. 10-06-2025 11:10 PM
- Posted Re: Essentials to Expanded Model on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 10-04-2025 06:38 AM
- Posted Re: Joint Use - model as related table or use Structural Attachment Rule with StructureJunctionObject? on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 10-01-2025 02:14 PM
- Got a Kudo for Re: Joint Use - model as related table or use Structural Attachment Rule with StructureJunctionObject?. 10-01-2025 07:04 AM
- Got a Kudo for Re: Joint Use - model as related table or use Structural Attachment Rule with StructureJunctionObject?. 10-01-2025 06:20 AM
- Posted Re: Joint Use - model as related table or use Structural Attachment Rule with StructureJunctionObject? on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 10-01-2025 06:15 AM
- Posted Re: Joint Use - model as related table or use Structural Attachment Rule with StructureJunctionObject? on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 10-01-2025 05:46 AM
- Got a Kudo for The Electric Utility Network Foundation Model - Essential Utility Network Concepts for Electric, part 1. 08-26-2025 10:26 AM
- Posted Re: Add custom feature layer to Utility Network Solution on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 08-09-2025 05:47 AM
User Groups for JohnAlsup
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Tuesday
|