Latest Contributions by Gisbert61

@AndreaB_  Are you old enough to have been using Arcmap 9.xy? Great fun it was finding a complete redesigned workspace every time you logged into the classroom desktop to do GIS. ... View more

This readability issue was the sole reason I had my IT fall back to Pro 3.5. I'm following with interest but no way I will use 3.6 until this is over.   I appreciate everybody's involvement but reading that @ShitijMehta will "t r y  to address s o m e of the issues s o o n" in a 3 week old post does not make me feel very confident. Does the development team still even exist?   Happy holidays everyone! ... View more

Awful and unreadable layout! I wish I had known this before upgrade to 3.6. This is how I found my model after 3.6. In 3.5 it was all readable. Is there a way to increase the font?     edit: I'm back to 3.5.5. ... View more

Why are my model parts unreadable small after upgrade to 3.6? Surely there must be some setting to normalise this?   ... View more

I would like to support that idea. GEOPDF's are a really useful and low impact feature to offer to various non-gis users. ... View more

Newest info: when exported as a filegeodatabase and deployed as a hosted feature layer I can see 29 fields when looking at the feature layer - data tab. That seems ok, but when I enter that layer in a webmap and look at the fields with the formsbuilder of field maps designer I see only 19 fields. Some of those fields have been previously deleted, but somehow still visible. Also i don't see some of the fields that show up in  the data tab of the layer. formsbuilder: fields in the data tab:   So, that is something I didn't expect. Anyone any idea?   I read somewhere the form is stored with the feature, ss there a way to strip the form completely from the feature?   And  to make things even more eerie: Yesterday afternoon I repeated the whole process: unzip the downloaded geodatabase, load the feature, share it to online (using a different name) and exactly the same happened (no surprise there) BUT this morning that feature layer showed 22 fields ... no outdated fields and the new fields visible. Is there some sort of caching somewhere in ArcGIS Online? I'm the only one with admin rights in our organization. Could a fieldworker have caused this by trying to submit a record?   Confused,   Thanks for your time.   Bert        ... View more

Hey @CodyPatterson, This is happening to multiple (all) users, iPhone (SE) and Android(15). Uninstalling and reinstalling the app didn't work on my Android and iPhone. I have the same issue on a iPad mini(a17 pro) which runs iOS 18.2.1,    Creating a new map with this layer does not help, the issue remains the same. Dutch support asked me to check if the popup or form shows deleted fields but that is not the case. The only reference to the deleted fields is in the logging of the field maps.   ... View more

I've found that 25.2.0 has better, more detailed error logging! It even has a 'verbose' slider. Aside from other features I'm already very happy with this. ... View more

i accepted  @RTPL_AU as solution as it helped me further. I'm still unable to get a valid count of <null> values but there might be a problem in my dataset about datetime fields. .. ... View more

Aha, I got the count per your example, excellent. A bit peculiar that symbology simply stops after ten items and does not display the rest automatically but okay I guess. So I have 1576 <null> values visible as 'other'. This is confirmed by looking at the attribute table   In the mean time I have de-installed and re-installed Pro 3.5.3 so I'm at 3.5.0 until IT can start the 3.5.3 patch   ... View more

@RTPL_AU  I don't seem to be able to add a count to a symbology in the webviewer, however when I create the same symbology (Unique symbols) several values are omitted in the webviewer which i can see in Pro:   I miss 11, 12, 15 and 22. Regards, Bert       ... View more

Hi RTPL_AU, Nothing changes in the symbology nor the count after I add that definition query (I see less points on the map of course) but thats it.. ... View more