|
POST
|
Great questions @GISP00, We are currently working on publishing additional guidance around the latest Foundations updates related to Asset State (formerly Lifecycle Status) and Asset Lifecycle Status (formerly Construction Status). That information should be available soon and will address many of these questions. Before addressing your questions individually, one important note: with the latest release, Asset State values are now aligned across foundations, while Asset Lifecycle Status values are intended to be more flexible and can be adapted to your workflows. This should help multi-utility organizations standardize where it matters, while still allowing operational differences where needed. 1.) Why are the coded value descriptions different? Previously, the Gas foundation did not include a separate Construction Status field like other foundations. Instead, all lifecycle-related values were combined into a single Lifecycle Status field. Because of this, the Lifecycle Status domain in Gas evolved differently and included both operational state and lifecycle progression values. This is why you see differences such as Approved or Under Construction in Gas versus In Service or Planned Removal in Electric. In the latest release, we’ve improved alignment: Lifecycle Status gets renamed to Asset State and is standardized across foundations For foundations that had a Construction Status field it is renamed to Asset Lifecycle Status. For foundations that did not have a Construction Status field, Asset Lifecycle Status is new. For Gas, Asset Lifecycle Status is a new field. Some legacy values were migrated, so you may still see slight differences in coded values and descriptions depending on workflows and historical usage. 2.) Can I add '32 - Abandoned' to Electric? With the updated model: It is strongly recommended not to modify Asset State values (formerly Lifecycle Status), as these are tightly integrated with trace configurations and tier definitions. You are free to configure Asset Lifecycle Status values to meet your business needs. If you need to represent Abandoned, it is appropriate to add it as an Asset Lifecycle Status value, and when something is set to abandoned its corresponding value in Asset State should be set to Out of Service. To support consistency, we’ve also introduced a geoprocessing tool that can create an attribute rule to keep Asset State and Asset Lifecycle Status in sync, if desired Configure (your domain) Utility Network Foundation. 3.) Should abandoned features stay in the UN? You can represent abandoned assets using: Asset State = Out of Service Asset Lifecycle Status = Abandoned However, over time, it is generally recommended to establish a workflow to retire or move abandoned assets out of the utility network. This helps: Improve performance Reduce network complexity Simplify ongoing maintenance Your current approach of moving abandoned assets to a separate feature class is still a valid and common pattern. 4.) How should “Spare” be handled? Yes — mapping a "Spare" subtype to: Asset State = Out of Service is a reasonable approach, assuming the asset is not actively participating in the network (e.g., not carrying load or flow). This ensures the asset is still modeled in the utility network but will not participate in traces, which aligns with how spare infrastructure is typically treated. 5.) Role of Asset State vs Asset Lifecycle Status in tracing Asset State (formerly Lifecycle Status) is the primary driver for tracing and subnetwork participation. Values of In Service and Planned Removal are considered active and will participate in traces or subnetworks. Values of Out of Service or Proposed are considered inactive and will not participate in traces or subnetworks. Asset Lifecycle Status (formerly Construction Status) does not directly affect tracing. It is used for tracking the lifecycle stage of an asset (e.g., planned, under construction, abandoned) for workflows, reporting, and asset management. You can review how Asset State is used in tracing by looking at the trace configuration defined for each tier.
... View more
yesterday
|
1
|
0
|
29
|
|
POST
|
Hi Ed, That is a great question. I would recommend using the P_PipeCrossing feature class for this. The 'Pipe Utility' subtype would be the most common type of crossbores, and the Crossing Feature Type field already has values for Sewer and Storm Sewer. If there are values that are missing for your use, you can expand/modify the existing values. What we do not have is any attribution directly tied to a crossbore, although I think you could get creative and use the 'Depth of Crossing Feature' field and store this as 0 (zero) to indicate that the pipe is intersecting. If this doesn't fit your needs, I would suggest adding a new field to this feature class called 'Crossbore', type=Short, Domain=Yes/No with a default of 'null' or 'No' to account for non-crossbore crossings.
... View more
Tuesday
|
1
|
0
|
102
|
|
POST
|
Hi Ed. It is an interesting topic that you are inquiring about. It might help to understand whether the use of Test Points as Subnetwork Controllers causes issues in your situation, possibly you are not modeling Test Points, or if you are only exploring alternatives? I do believe that you should be fine to alter your tier to include rectifiers and anodes as controllers. The CP tier is a bit different from the system or pressure tiers in that we are not tracing upstream or downstream, but tracing to find the connected CP features. In this way, it makes sense to have a Test Point modeled as a subnetwork controller because it seems that these should always be used, whether it is a galvanic or impressed current system, and were not chosen for any logical reason such as a device that is 'controlling' anything related to CP. I would love to hear more about your use case.
... View more
12-17-2025
01:13 PM
|
0
|
1
|
920
|
|
POST
|
The 'Device Status' field is intended to reflect the present position of the valve, whether open or closed. This is intended to be used along with the 'Normal Position' field to indicate both the present and the normal operational states of a valve.
... View more
11-12-2025
05:58 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1160
|
|
BLOG
|
@jeannl, the documentation for 2.3 states that it is compatible for 10.9.1, so you can download the solution from ArcGIS Online and use with 10.9.1. I would, however, recommend using 11.1 as that is the most current long term release which follows the Utility Network Management Release. Upgrading will not only give you a longer support window, but also give you the advantage of the upgrades since 10.9.1 was released. We understand that some organizations may have business reasons which prevent upgrading to 11.1, so if this is your case, you can stick with 10.9.1.
... View more
03-01-2024
08:13 AM
|
0
|
0
|
8553
|
|
BLOG
|
Hi @jeannl, I recommend that you update untools to the latest version (2.9.7) and use the latest version (2.3) of the Gas and Pipeline Referencing Utility Network Foundation which can be acquired from ArcGIS Online or ArcGIS Enterprise 11.2. Would you mind creating a new post in ArcGIS Utility Network Questions after trying the above steps and posting the errors in the new post? This will give the issue more visibility with our support team here at Esri versus being posted in comments for a blog posting - it won't see the same eyeballs as it will in Utility Network Questions. Thank you.
... View more
02-28-2024
05:42 AM
|
0
|
0
|
8612
|
|
POST
|
Hi @Cristian_Galindo, could you also reach out to Customer Support to troubleshoot this issue? Unfortunately, when I deploy the solution in 4 different Online orgs, it is always successful. It sounds like it may be something specific to your user and/or Online organization and I would like Customer Support to troubleshoot. Have you tried deploying with a different username in your organization to see if it is tied to your username, or is an issue with your Online organization? If customer support is unable to resolve, I can send you the package via email, just let me know.
... View more
02-26-2024
07:42 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3428
|
|
POST
|
@AparnaSunki - I'm sorry you are having problems deploying the solution. I have not seen this error before, and I am not able to troubleshoot the issue because I am not experiencing the error and I have tried in several different ArcGIS Online organizations. Could you reach out to Customer Support so that they can troubleshoot this issue and determine if this is something specific to your ArcGIS Online organization, or something more persistent?
... View more
02-26-2024
07:36 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3428
|
|
POST
|
I do not have an explanation, although I have deployed this solution from 3 different Online organizations, and all of them deliver the 1.3 solution. I will see if I can track down the issue, but in the meantime, have you tried deploying the solution from an Incognito browser session? You mentioned using different orgs and browsers, but if your browser has this template in it's cache, that may not matter. I would like to hear if you have the same issue using an Incognito session, which will bypass any cache you may have in any of your browser sessions. This is discussed here: Wikipedia: Bypass your cache. I have also attached the 1.3 version of the solution in case you are unable to download the updated template.
... View more
12-01-2023
06:50 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1670
|
|
POST
|
Hi @Cristian_Galindo, This is strange and the only guess I have is that this is some type of caching issue. To verify, you deployed the solution in ArcGIS Online, correct? Can you try to deploy the solution from a browser window in Incognito (Chrome) or InPrivate (Edge) mode?
... View more
12-01-2023
06:25 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1676
|
|
BLOG
|
@lorenzoz I would like to add that the UN Foundation solutions have incorporated tasks that guide through how to reset the maps using the toolbox that @MichaelHirschheimer mentions. I mention this because referencing the tasks may help other users to avoid some of these pitfalls. It seems that the task framework is relatively unknown to a lot of users - hoping to get a slight bump here to promote awareness that may save time and effort to some of the more straightforward workflows to deploy. Here is a picture that shows a typical task framework that you would find in any of the UN foundation solutions as well as the location in the 'Tasks' folder: Gas and Pipeline Referencing Utility Network Foundation's 'Use' help doc:
... View more
08-24-2023
07:18 AM
|
1
|
0
|
9829
|
|
POST
|
We do not have a PDF file for this, but here is a link to the Data Dictionary and here is a link to the solution. When you deploy the solution, there is a Pro Project that comes with a map that points to sample data in a file geodatabase where you can view the Asset Types.
... View more
07-24-2023
07:47 AM
|
0
|
0
|
807
|
|
POST
|
Verification, but still important - I believe the version of Pro you are using is a typo, I'm assuming you are using Pro 3.1.2, not 3.2.1... Can you try outputting the GDB to a local drive vs network? Finally, it appears you have a typo in the Z Tolerance. Please verify, but it should be .001 instead of .0001. I was able to run the tool successfully even using the incorrect Z tolerance, so I might prioritize running the output GDB locally vs to the network - this is a lot of data to be writing across the network.
... View more
07-20-2023
10:03 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2723
|
|
POST
|
Hi @Cristian_Galindo, can you verify that you are using Pro 3.1? In this version of the solution, we are supporting both Enterprise 10.9.1 (Pro 2.9) and 11.1 (Pro 3.1). It appears that you are using the UtilityDataManagementSupport_3.1 toolbox, which requires Pro 3.1. I do not know if this would cause an issue, but is your "U" drive local or a network drive?
... View more
07-20-2023
06:25 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2740
|
|
POST
|
Link for the latest Gas and Pipeline Referencing Utility Network Foundation which includes the UPDM data model: https://doc.arcgis.com/en/arcgis-solutions/latest/reference/introduction-to-gas-and-pipeline-referencing-utility-network-foundation.htm
... View more
07-05-2023
09:27 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1581
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | yesterday | |
| 1 | Tuesday | |
| 1 | 11-12-2025 05:58 AM | |
| 1 | 08-24-2023 07:18 AM | |
| 1 | 07-05-2023 09:27 AM |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|