AnsweredAssumed Answered

Feature Class in File Geodatabase taking Much Less Disk Space than when in SQL Server Geodatabase

Question asked by ivangis on Jul 2, 2019
Latest reply on Jul 2, 2019 by George_Thompson-esristaff

I have compared feature-class disk-space usage between file-geodatabase format and SQL Server. I have found disk space used in SQL Server to be about 2.7-3.3 times larger in SQL Server (not including log-file space in SQL Server).

 

I used sp_spaceused to get table (feature class) disk-space numbers from SQL Server.

 

Why is there such a large difference? I understand that these 2 databases store geometries in different ways. Is the file-geodatabase format super efficient w/ storage?

Outcomes