Latest Contributions by VHolubec

Great, thank you @JonDeRose. ... View more

Hello @AnnieChindu23MbaLk,   please try the form on the bottom of this page: https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-allsource/overview?srsltid=AfmBOoprYuxChPF23BqQPQrYsOzmCnYJ6bWvc_lfJve5S4N0txNhczk3 Try to contact Esri Sales team or your Tech Support of Customer services from the links on the page: Hope it helps.   ... View more

Dobrý den, @VojtěchBlažek, zkuste prosím Atlas šablonu znovu, chyba s podobným chováním na této šabloně byla s aktuálním updatem opravena.  ... View more

Invitation link to where @ARHOANS, to my.esri? If so, please contact colleagues of your organization respomsible for My.Esri, who would then solve it with your Esri Distributor or Esri Customer Service.   ... View more

Hi @NadiaAlami, yes I´ve installed ArcGIS Enterprise 11.3 (it was released yesterday). It works there. If you have older Enterprise, you have to use, as @PaulLeBlanc1 and @RobertKrisher  mentioned, older version of the ArcGIS Pro. ... View more

Thank you @RobertKrisher, give me a day or two please, I deleted all and starting everything from scratch and I won´t go directly from AssetPackage, but via Single User FGDB prototype to migrate data to Services without errors in topology.   ... View more

Thank you @RobertKrisher, for answer, by Error layers do you mean the Errors/Dirty Areas created with Enabling Topology or the Error layers which can be added from TOC from the Asset group subtype?  The latter mentioned is greyed out in my case. But all the rules should works, I kept the default - just import custom Asset package created based on the default one But the editing errors in the map (before the topology is enabled - the errors raised by running the Enable Topology with option to show errors only) worked fine, as well as the validation - run by the enable topology tools again, so I hope everything should be fine there.   ... View more

Thank you for answers @PaulLeBlanc1, @RobertKrisher! ... View more

Hello @TedHoward2, thank you for answers. Instead of making more excels and use the query you mentioned (assetgroup in (1,2,3)) in DataReference excel, I´ve gone the way of consolidating you mentioned - and so the way of "double lookup", where in the list of values sheet I set the new fields for Asset Group alongside the Asset Type: And then set the lookup for the Asset Type and Asset group.     I hope this workflow is correct and the most possible consolidated, right? I didn´t know that I can make "advanced lookup" and use both Asset Group and Asset Type in the value list above - if you @TedHoward2 or @RobertKrisher  would think about the next blog post - please consider to describe those tips and trick for data loading with more inspiring examples. I have a feeling that users don´t know all the handy ways they could use there! Thank you very much for help!     ... View more

Hello @TedHoward2, thank you for those resources!  Just one additional question, just to be sure I understand it correctly - one Mapping Worksheet, can´t point to more AssetGroups - am I right? So if the source layer point to more asset group, the best way is to use query definition in Data Reference - as mentioned in the video here: Duplicate the first initial record in the Excel for each asset type + duplicate the excels each with different name (so it´s not necessary to run the Create Data Loading Workspace once again) Am I right?  Thank you. ... View more