|
POST
|
I connected with Jasmine on this. There was an issue with a field domain and symbolizing by that field. She recreated the FC in the geodatabase, appended the data and correct domains. Then copied back into the correct FDS. We were able to symbolize correctly after that point. Seems like Pro did not like that feature class.
... View more
03-28-2024
11:54 AM
|
1
|
0
|
2430
|
|
POST
|
I would read that the same way based on the table. I would recommend reaching out to your Esri Account Manager for confirmation.
... View more
03-28-2024
11:28 AM
|
1
|
0
|
12851
|
|
POST
|
Once you branch versioned the data, you added that feature class back to a Pro map and that is when the issue occured?
... View more
03-28-2024
10:23 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2503
|
|
POST
|
I would recommend reaching out to technical support on this to have them investigate.
... View more
03-28-2024
06:47 AM
|
1
|
3
|
5663
|
|
POST
|
You may want to take a look at the tools from @JakeSkinner Report ArcGIS Enterprise/ArcGIS Online Item Dependencies
... View more
03-27-2024
01:52 PM
|
2
|
0
|
1807
|
|
POST
|
If I simply create a child from the default version to republish editable services from that, would that theoretically be all I need to do for an extra safeguard? That could be one pattern, but that may cause blocking states during the reconcile / posting process in the future. I am not sure about the second question but could help with knowing what versions are not reconciled / posted yet. The big thing is that if you want to keep the Enterprise Geodatabase clean, to reconcile / post / then delete that version. That can help prevent "blockers" later on in the compress process.
... View more
03-26-2024
01:20 PM
|
0
|
0
|
4676
|
|
POST
|
Yes, ArcGIS Pro works with an Oracle Enterprise Geodatabase. I know that you had other posts about connecting to an Oracle database / geodatabase earlier this week. Did you get those resolved?
... View more
03-26-2024
01:17 PM
|
2
|
1
|
1078
|
|
POST
|
I usually recommend that you have your IT create AD groups for editors / viewers. Then you add those groups to the SQL Instance (via SSMS), map them to the EGDB, and grant edit / view permissions via ArcGIS Pro. You should not be sharing the data owner connection information with editors as they would have more permissions that needed. This also does not make you responsible for updating access to their account if IT disables it (i.e., they leave your organization). https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/geodatabases/manage-sql-server/add-users-sqlserver.htm#ESRI_SECTION1_1EF70F32F80041FB9666781BD3D78754
... View more
03-26-2024
07:00 AM
|
2
|
1
|
8141
|
|
POST
|
Yes, you could create a child version and publish that. You would then need to incorporate some additional processes to what you do now. Here is some great doc / code samples that review this: Process - https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/geodatabases/overview/recommended-version-administration-workflow.htm Scripting (for automation) - https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/geodatabases/overview/using-python-scripting-to-batch-reconcile-and-post-versions.htm Hope this helps!
... View more
03-21-2024
09:30 AM
|
0
|
2
|
4741
|
|
POST
|
Do you have an Oracle DBA team? If so, reach out to them about this as they should be able to help you with configuring the client correctly.
... View more
03-21-2024
03:46 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2089
|
|
POST
|
Not an ArcFM expert, but found this to convert it to Esri objects: https://myarcfm.schneider-electric.com/myarcfm/s/article/Remember-the-ArcFM-Solution-Object-Converter I think this would be run in ArcMap before coping to the file geodatabase......
... View more
03-20-2024
07:49 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1721
|
|
POST
|
Does the data have ArcFM extension on it? I have seen a similar error when the client (Pro in this case) does not have an ArcFM reader installed.
... View more
03-20-2024
07:20 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1779
|
|
POST
|
Editing via feature services is supported and done by many organizations. You may want to make sure that the feature service was published from a version other than DEFAULT or you could have similar issues.
... View more
03-20-2024
04:16 AM
|
0
|
0
|
4761
|
|
POST
|
If you have a full backup of the SQL database before the point in time of the deletions, then you could restore to another SQL Instance and see if you can export the features you need. I think this may be the only way that you could get them back. The backup process is not an Esri one but more on the SQL Server side of the house. The frequency in which you do the backups depends on your organizations policies. Many people do it daily or weekly with daily differentials. I would also recommend not just editing in DEFAULT due to issues like you have experienced. Create versions off DEFAULT for editing (https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/geodatabases/overview/traditional-version-scenarios.htm), then follow the reconcile / post process: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/geodatabases/overview/recommended-version-administration-workflow.htm
... View more
03-19-2024
12:20 PM
|
2
|
1
|
4835
|
|
POST
|
As mentioned above, you can schedule the Python script to run in ArcGIS Pro or Windows Task Scheduler: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/analysis/geoprocessing/basics/schedule-geoprocessing-tools.htm
... View more
03-19-2024
03:52 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1948
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Wednesday | |
| 1 | Tuesday | |
| 2 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 2 | 07-01-2026 04:09 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Friday
|