POST
|
In ArcGIS Pro 1.3 & 1.3.1 the Intersect gp tool does not produce any valid output if the first input feature class contains a near vertical polyline ZM and the second input feature class contains a Polygon Z. If I choose the ‘Point’ at the output type the resulting output feature class remains always empty. However the intersection is clearly visible: see attachment below. According to the visual examination the result should be a single point. Ákos Halmai
... View more
08-31-2016
02:19 AM
|
0
|
4
|
1539
|
POST
|
I can share here too because it is only a sample from "unknown" location: https://community.esri.com/servlet/JiveServlet/downloadBody/8672-102-1-10779/Cylinder.gdb.zip I hope the URL working. It is a simple cylinder with 36 sides (36+1 vertex on the top and 36+1 vertex on the bottom, constructed as TriangleStrip, where the "+1" is the closing vertex) created by the GeneralMultipatchCreator CoClass from ArcObjects. Each vertex has texture coordinate, no normals included. The coordinate system is EPSG 23700. The problem is quite simple: I can’t zoom in enough to see the geologically important details of the texture. (The gray line is an orientation marker on it.)
... View more
08-23-2016
12:00 PM
|
0
|
0
|
904
|
POST
|
If the extent of a multipatch layer in ArcGIS Pro Local Scene is extremely small (e.g. 0.5 × 0.5 × 1 m; H×W×D) then the near clipping plane is too close. If I try to zoom in to see the details the view is simply truncated by the near plane. Can I somehow change the distance of these clipping planes? Ákos Halmai
... View more
08-22-2016
05:20 AM
|
0
|
7
|
2133
|
IDEA
|
Make able the Field Mapping in all Geoprocessing tools to consume constant values, not just fields. In some cases for example in the Append tool in NO_TEST scenarios it would be extremely useful to fulfill a field (or multiple fields) with a constant value. There is a quite simple workaround to achieve this: leave the field unmapped and then fill it with Field Calculator. But if this feature would be integrated into the field mapping then it would be more convenient, consistent and more logical to use (raster tools can also consume constant values). Ákos Halmai
... View more
06-26-2016
08:42 AM
|
5
|
2
|
2270
|
IDEA
|
It is already implemented in ArcGIS Pro, it should be marked with “Implemented” stamp. However it would be great in ArcScene too…
... View more
06-05-2016
01:00 PM
|
0
|
0
|
919
|
POST
|
When will registration open for GISDay 2016? (http://www.gisday.com/register.html)
... View more
05-21-2016
09:53 AM
|
0
|
4
|
3448
|
POST
|
Thanks Marianne! (Oder ich sollte „Danke“ sagen?) With this help I found the complete list: “Fallstriche” (German) = “Slope line” (English) = “Eséstüske” (Hungarian) = “Trattino di pendenza” (Italian) = “Spádnice” (Czech) = “Tiret de pente” (French). (http://lazarus.elte.hu/tajfutas/isom2000/)
... View more
05-19-2016
12:11 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1102
|
POST
|
I already found the German name: these are the “Fallstriche”. (http://www.o-l.ch/karten/isom/331ch.htm Figure 104) I’ll ask the UK and the German user group for this mysterious name.
... View more
05-16-2016
05:32 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1102
|
POST
|
I’d like to know the name of these spikes (see attached images below). There is only one or two on the contour (marked with “1.0”). These spikes helps to clarify uncertainties—whether the slope points upwards or downwards. It could be used not only for depressions (like hachures does) but in all cases of uncertainties. For example the second image—without these spikes—could be a saddle or a ridge too. But the spikes help to clarify that the central part is—actually—lower so it’s a negative feature on the terrain. This technique is may be not used by the cartographers in the US. Reproducing them in ArcGIS is not only a simple symbology or representation question. It’s much more complicated .
... View more
05-14-2016
04:23 AM
|
0
|
4
|
1102
|
POST
|
Can somebody tell me the correct English name of the small spikes on the contour lines (isohypse) pointing downhill, showing the steepest direction between two contours? How can I reproduce them in ArcGIS?
... View more
05-13-2016
11:43 AM
|
0
|
7
|
5367
|
POST
|
But answering to the question: I have a highly interconnected database maintained by ~70 relationships and I wouldn’t like to lose them.
... View more
04-25-2016
10:55 AM
|
0
|
0
|
534
|
POST
|
The simplest workaround (without moving or modifying the original data) is to create a layer in ArcMap, chose any type of symbology except representation, save it as a layer file, add to ArcScene and … it’s working! (Thanks to János Hárs) However, this is a bug and should be corrected. Ákos Halmai
... View more
04-25-2016
10:50 AM
|
0
|
0
|
534
|
POST
|
The ArcScene always crashes if try to add a feature class with representation. I think it is an old, and probably well-known bug. I wouldn’t use the representation itself in ArcScene, a simple feature renderer would be perfect too. Is there any workaround to use a feature class with representation in ArcScene? (Without removing the representation, or moving the data to different workspace.) Ákos Halmai
... View more
04-23-2016
09:49 AM
|
0
|
3
|
3943
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 08-01-2023 12:48 PM | |
3 | 07-12-2023 01:15 PM | |
6 | 08-21-2020 02:18 AM | |
1 | 10-06-2016 03:14 AM | |
1 | 02-19-2017 09:48 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
06-03-2024
10:41 AM
|