|
POST
|
Hi Dale, We have put all the requested methods into ArcGIS Pro 2.3 which will be released early 2019. Thanks again for the feedback. Take care, Annette
... View more
10-17-2018
10:28 AM
|
3
|
1
|
2686
|
|
POST
|
We are interpolating between known coordinates/measures. Nothing harder than that.
... View more
10-11-2018
02:40 PM
|
2
|
0
|
2686
|
|
POST
|
Hi Dale, GetSubCurve() is not exactly what you want, but you can probably make it work. We will add the three methods that you have listed above. I'm sure other people will make use of them too. Thank you for the feedback. Annette
... View more
10-11-2018
10:04 AM
|
1
|
5
|
2686
|
|
POST
|
Hi Jon, I just want to let you know that I am still looking into this. I should have some more information soon. Annette
... View more
08-08-2018
11:14 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1136
|
|
POST
|
Let me look into this, Jon. I will get back to you. Annette
... View more
07-11-2018
12:12 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1136
|
|
POST
|
Hi Jon, There is not an equivalent to setting a default transformation. Create a ProjectionTransformation and call GeometryEngine.ProjectEx. Annette
... View more
07-02-2018
01:57 PM
|
0
|
3
|
1136
|
|
POST
|
Hi Jon, Indeed, this is a bug. It will be fixed in the next release. Good news though. There is a workaround. Create a composite transformation from a list that contains the inverse geographic transformation, and then create the projection transformation from that. List listOfGTs = new List() { gti }; CompositeGeographicTransformation cgt = CompositeGeographicTransformation.Create(listOfGTs); ProjectionTransformation pt4326to27700 = ProjectionTransformation.CreateEx(sr4326, sr27700, cgt); MapPoint mp4326as27700 = GeometryEngine.Instance.ProjectEx(mp4326, pt4326to27700) as MapPoint; Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Annette
... View more
06-29-2018
12:53 PM
|
0
|
1
|
846
|
|
POST
|
Hi Taner, I just wanted to let you know that this issue was addressed in ArcGIS Pro 2.1.2. Annette
... View more
05-14-2018
04:34 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3121
|
|
POST
|
ArcGIS Pro 2.2 is scheduled to be released in June. Your workaround sounds good.
... View more
05-10-2018
02:01 PM
|
0
|
0
|
670
|
|
POST
|
Hi, In the upcoming release, ArcGIS Pro 2.2, the SDK will have a method in the GeometryEngine class that will accomplish what you want to do. It is called SideBuffer, and you will be able to specify round or flat endpoints. Thank you for your interest, Annette
... View more
05-08-2018
01:56 PM
|
0
|
2
|
670
|
|
POST
|
Hi Taner, Thank you for your patience. The fix for this issue is being considered for ArcGIS Pro 2.1.2 with a targeted release date of March 13. I will keep you posted. Annette
... View more
02-05-2018
02:03 PM
|
2
|
2
|
3121
|
|
POST
|
Hi Taner, I am still working on this. I should have some more information for you in a couple of days. Thanks, Annette
... View more
02-02-2018
10:02 AM
|
0
|
3
|
3121
|
|
POST
|
Hi Taner, This is the same issue as https://community.esri.com/message/732957-draw-arc-line-offset-problem-in-arcgis-pro-sdk?et=watches.email.thread . It will be fixed in the next release. I am looking into a workaround in the meantime and will keep you posted. Thanks, Annette
... View more
12-20-2017
10:16 AM
|
1
|
5
|
3121
|
|
POST
|
Hi, The output geometry is a linear approximation when the input geometry has curves, so that is why you see the extra vertices. However, the case you present with OffsetType.Miter shouldn't have those extra segments. This will be fixed in the next release. Thanks for pointing out the issue. Let me know if you have any questions. Annette
... View more
12-06-2017
11:49 AM
|
1
|
1
|
1201
|
|
POST
|
This formula will be used in any case. To store the polygon in the database it has to be simplified. Annette
... View more
09-20-2017
02:34 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1027
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10-30-2025 01:40 PM | |
| 1 | 02-21-2025 11:20 AM | |
| 2 | 11-29-2022 02:02 PM | |
| 1 | 11-08-2022 09:14 AM | |
| 1 | 10-11-2022 08:18 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|