|
POST
|
The "body::esri:visible" column should behave like the relevant column, but hiding and showing data with this column shouldn't clear out data. Give that a try and let us know how it goes, I've only seen this in the docs and never in practice.
... View more
07-31-2025
03:13 PM
|
1
|
1
|
432
|
|
POST
|
Do the domains work if you use the Copy Data options to create a hosted feature service? Do you have a registered folder with file geodatabases that already works? If so does replicating steps 1 to 4 into one of those geodatabases work?
... View more
07-31-2025
09:14 AM
|
1
|
0
|
244
|
|
POST
|
When I rematch addresses I often have to bypass the geocoder entirely by hopping into Google Maps, grabbing the latitude & longitude and using that to place the address. As far as I can tell the only way to do this is to combine the Locate pane with the little "Pick from Map" cursor, which is imprecise and annoying. Is there a way to plug the coordinates I get from external services right into the rematch pane to get the exact location?
... View more
07-31-2025
09:12 AM
|
0
|
0
|
219
|
|
POST
|
There's currently no way to have a service with zero feature layers. If you can add your query layer to an existing service that's ideal. If not, you can use your database's geometry functions to add an extra column to make it spatial. An example for SQL Server: SELECT
a.*,
geometry::STGeomFromText('POINT (0 0)', 3857) [Shape]
FROM
[user].[table] a
... View more
07-30-2025
04:59 PM
|
1
|
0
|
268
|
|
POST
|
Try publishing the form without the links to your registered services so it creates a brand new hosted service. You can compare this service to your registered service to see what changes have to be made.
... View more
07-30-2025
08:28 AM
|
0
|
0
|
709
|
|
POST
|
1. You can use the Excel to Table tool to skip the csv step, if you make the Excel column use Text formatting that should preserve the data type and the leading zeroes. If that doesn't work, you can Calculate Field the zeroes back in using Python. For example, if there should always be 8 digits in the code, the expression is "{:08d}".format(!GEOID!) 2. You can't do a Many-to-Many table join because there has to be an intermediate table to hold the relationships. If you have a true M-N relationship you have to add a Relate.
... View more
07-15-2025
09:51 AM
|
1
|
3
|
523
|
|
POST
|
Blindly calling First on a FeatureSet causes issues during rule validation -- even if the FeatureSet has data -- so do a if (Count(locid) == 0) return before you grab the first feature to avoid issues.
... View more
07-10-2025
03:40 PM
|
1
|
1
|
465
|
|
POST
|
Changes to maps shouldn't cause any issues with the offline copy, the crews will just have to wait until they download new areas to get the new maps. The only real issue is if you change the services the maps reference, then fix it in the new map, those offline areas will probably break if you do that.
... View more
07-10-2025
03:34 PM
|
3
|
0
|
455
|
|
POST
|
In that case I think you've hit a wall, ArcGIS doesn't have a "no more edits after this point" feature at a low enough level to absolutely prevent tampering. Some half-measures you can try: Try adding a deviceid question to see if the survey is accessed from the field app or not, you might be able to make every question read-only if it's not accessed from the app. Using webhooks you can look for "finished" forms and copy the data to a new survey that's read-only, which becomes your new view for reporting. Run sweeps of the data to see if the last edit date differs from the completion date the user enters (or one you capture manually using an end question) and then deal with those people on a case-by-case basis. If this survey was talking to registered Enterprise data you could also roll the changes back on the database side but it sounds like that isn't an option.
... View more
07-10-2025
08:08 AM
|
1
|
0
|
630
|
|
POST
|
You can pop a filter on the Inbox that only allows surveys where a required stage 2 field is null (e.g. date_complete IS NULL or something). Once part 2 is done they shouldn't be able to hop back in there via the Inbox but it'll show up in maps and whatnot.
... View more
07-09-2025
02:02 PM
|
0
|
0
|
673
|
|
POST
|
At a high level, it sounds like you need to create 4 polygons (1 per quadrant) and then join that info into the parcels so you can export a list. For the first half: take your city boundary polygon (or draw a rough one yourself, doesn't have to be exact), then make sure the highways extend to (or past) that boundary, then throw the boundary and the relevant highway lines into Feature to Polygon to get the 4 quadrants. For the second half: Spatial Join will spit out the enriched parcels, then you can export them to whatever format you need.
... View more
07-03-2025
12:32 PM
|
1
|
0
|
339
|
|
POST
|
Crud, I missed that in the title, good catch! I whipped up an Idea to get this into Python Toolbox tools, please click the picture of a thumb.
... View more
07-03-2025
11:08 AM
|
1
|
0
|
791
|
|
IDEA
|
ArcGIS Pro 3.4 adds Attributes to the toolbox spec which adds extra options to script tools that were previously limited to default tools. The catch: these can't be added to Python Toolbox tools, at least not in any stable or documented way. Please add support for Python Toolboxes. An "attributes" property on each tool that stores a list of attributes to set would align with how ATBX files store this info, something like: class Tool:
def __init__(self):
"""Define the tool (tool name is the name of the class)."""
self.label = "Tool"
self.description = "My tool that edits the input data and costs credits."
self.attributes = ["input_data_change", "credits"]
... View more
07-03-2025
11:06 AM
|
4
|
1
|
468
|
|
POST
|
I usually see that error when my tools have validation code, does removing the validation before publishing fix things?
... View more
07-03-2025
10:47 AM
|
0
|
0
|
393
|
|
POST
|
If you're authoring for Pro 3.4 or above you can check the new "Show banner that tool modifies the input data" option in the General properties. Looks official to me!
... View more
07-03-2025
09:15 AM
|
2
|
2
|
800
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 hours ago | |
| 1 | yesterday | |
| 1 | a week ago | |
| 1 | a week ago | |
| 1 | a week ago |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
6m ago
|