|
POST
|
I assume you're referring to the ArcGIS Data Store, and no, it doesn't support being registered to two distinct sites. You'll need to set up two separate servers, install the ArcGIS Data Store on each, and configure them as separate standby Data Stores for each primary.
... View more
06-24-2019
02:44 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1720
|
|
POST
|
I've never seen that type of information come through an error message. What operation are you running that returns that error?
... View more
06-24-2019
01:49 PM
|
0
|
3
|
2281
|
|
POST
|
Ideally, you'd have your web adaptor or reverse proxy in the DMZ that sends requests to the GIS Server within your internal network. You could set up your reverse proxy in the DMZ and send traffic to the web adaptor on 443 within your internal network so you only have the standard 443 port open between your DMZ and internal network: https://enterprise.arcgis.com/en/server/latest/administer/windows/firewalls-and-arcgis-server.htm#GUID-F8715765-4BEE-4CBC-AF6A-314D14EF5ACE We're working on updating that documentation, but that's the general idea. In terms of federating, Portal doesn't need access to the services URL, only the admin URL used to federate. For example, your machines could be within your internal network and you'd use https://server.domain.com:6443/arcgis as the admin URL. Externally, you'd have your nice FQDN that hides the internal machine names.
... View more
06-21-2019
04:37 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2493
|
|
POST
|
Robert Scheitlin, GISP is correct, it would be a similar workflow: https://enterprise.arcgis.com/en/portal/latest/administer/windows/using-a-reverse-proxy-server-with-portal-for-arcgis.htm
... View more
06-21-2019
04:32 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1773
|
|
POST
|
Can you expand on this a bit? So you had your prod environment and you then set up another machine, edited the etc\hosts file to match the prod URLs, installed and configured the software. Then you took a backup from prod and restored it to dev, then the error started appearing in prod? Once you deleted the dev environment, the errors went away?
... View more
06-20-2019
11:05 AM
|
0
|
2
|
7891
|
|
POST
|
The Portal content directory can be on the file system or in S3 buckets or Azure BLOBs, the latter two which would fall into object storage category. Server directories can only be on the file system but the Server config-store can be in DynamoDB or Azure tables. Finally, the ArcGIS Data Store directories must be on the file system. So in short, yes, but it depends on the product and only S3 or Azure BLOBs are supported.
... View more
06-19-2019
12:15 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1969
|
|
POST
|
You could look into if the property is exposed via the Python API. Alternatively, monitor the network traffic when updating one user and re-create the request via Python to update all users.
... View more
06-19-2019
09:49 AM
|
0
|
2
|
2639
|
|
POST
|
I wonder if a custom role would help: https://enterprise.arcgis.com/en/portal/latest/administer/windows/roles.htm#ESRI_SECTION2_0ABAFFB16D3E48E4B77FC4C32A148FB9 You could try to share an item both publicly and with the organization, then see if a public items are visible by users who can't see public content. Perhaps the "can't view content shared with organization" custom role takes precedent over the fact it's a public item.
... View more
06-18-2019
01:27 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1161
|
|
POST
|
You could take a look at the logs under C:\Program Files\ArcGIS\Portal\framework\runtime\ds\usr\logs\<machine>\elasticlog to see what's going on. My assumption is the index service can't start correctly. You can post any errors here if you'd like, or reach out to Support for further troubleshooting.
... View more
06-14-2019
09:57 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1150
|
|
POST
|
This is a bug, I don't think it's been logged yet though. Your workaround is valid and shouldn't cause any issues.
... View more
06-13-2019
11:46 AM
|
0
|
8
|
4779
|
|
POST
|
That check is imposed by the third party component we use for the index. We've removed the disk space check at 10.7.1. At 10.7, there are ways to turn it off as well, but work through Support for that information.
... View more
06-12-2019
11:45 AM
|
0
|
3
|
9677
|
|
POST
|
You need to create a service from it, whether that's your own internal ArcGIS Server as a traditional service, or ArcGIS Online/ArcGIS Enterprise as a hosted service. In short, if the URL has "MapServer" in it, you need to manually configure popups. If it has "FeatureServer" in it, then they should be enabled by default.
... View more
06-11-2019
03:03 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1251
|
|
POST
|
One definitive cause of this is if the config-store is not accessible after the new setup is complete. For example: 1) Install ArcGIS Server at a previous version. 2) Create the site with the config-store and directories on a share 3) Run the setup to upgrade to a newer version 4) While it's upgrading, make the config-store and directories inaccessible, (unshare the path, shut off the machine, etc) 5) Once the new setup is complete and Server starts, make the config-store and directories accessible again. You likely won't see the Upgrade option available at this point. We've made some changes for that logic at 10.7 and those steps can no longer reproduce the problem, so hopefully that will cover any other situation that may result in the API not displaying the Upgrade option.
... View more
06-11-2019
02:53 PM
|
1
|
0
|
2641
|
|
POST
|
Hm, the only thing I can think of for the The submitted field 'primarymaintenance_count' is not available in the layer '0' of the service 'AthleticField' error is the schema changed and whatever application making requests to the service, (OpenData, for example) is expecting the old schema. I see a primarymaintenance field, but not a primarymaintenance_count field. If you were to export the data into an FGDB, create a new service, and then run the same query does it work? ex: https://ags3.scgov.net/server/rest/services/Hosted/NewService/FeatureServer/0/query?f=json&where=1%3D1&outStatistics=[{%22statisticType%22:%22count%22,%22onStatisticField%22:%22objectid%22,%22outStatisticFieldName%22:%22objectIdCount%22}]
... View more
06-11-2019
11:25 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3003
|
|
POST
|
Assuming no load or requests are making it to the Server, the number of services you can publish to a 4 core and 32 core machine should be the same as long as the machines have the same amount of RAM. There's a bit of internal overhead for managing services and more cores will handle that better, but in general, it should be roughly the same. Once the machine starts taking requests, you'll need to monitor the usage and resources and make adjustments as necessary.
... View more
06-11-2019
09:17 AM
|
8
|
4
|
4671
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 05-28-2026 06:05 AM | |
| 1 | 08-26-2016 10:10 AM | |
| 2 | 02-22-2024 07:22 AM | |
| 1 | 06-07-2024 07:11 AM | |
| 4 | 12-12-2024 08:52 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
06-08-2026
07:43 AM
|