POST
|
I think the custom transformations worked, but I'm having an issue with re-projecting and exporting the rasters. They render ok on the fly, but exporting to the new system leaves black empty areas in the output. I may just have a memory issue, I'm running Pro in a VM on my MacBook Pro. Note: ignore the "noise" in the 2nd image, that's actually a 2nd raster over the Natural Earth one.
... View more
07-29-2020
12:27 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2532
|
POST
|
Thank you again Bojan! This is great, I'll take a stab at this later this week. Cheers, David.
... View more
07-21-2020
08:21 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2532
|
POST
|
Thanks Bojan. Sorry for taking so long to respond, been driving back home from Oregon. Given the parameters from my question above, to have the polyconic map centered on the US (around 100w 40n), can you think of a way to modify the input raster instead to accomplish that?
... View more
07-19-2020
12:27 PM
|
0
|
5
|
2532
|
POST
|
I'm helping an artist with a project that requires a modified polyconic projection of the world, centered on N America. The artist wants to render globe gores, like the image attached below, but with the center on the US (around 100w 40n). In both ArcMap and ArcGIS Pro I am able to modify the Central Meridian of standard polyconic coordinate system to re center along 100w meridian, but I can't make any changes to the Latitude of Origin to put N America under the center of the north pole. FYI, the artist has another team member who is using Global Mapper to generate the centered globe gores, but is also unable to modify the coordinate system to recenter the map. Any advice on how to change either the coordinate system itself or the input raster (Natural Earth GeoTIF) to get the desired effect is greatly appreciated.
... View more
07-14-2020
09:50 AM
|
1
|
7
|
2721
|
POST
|
update: although I can't tell you what I did differently, my exports now have the map layers showing in them. However, the Playback function still shows no frames or running animation which makes iterating changes extremely difficult. All of the help for this tool is focused on camera animation as opposed to tweening between static layers.
... View more
10-22-2019
12:50 PM
|
1
|
1
|
1231
|
POST
|
I'm trying to make a simple animation of a boundary progression over time in ArcGIS Pro. The data are a set of individual layers for a national boundary, each layer is a different time step. In the animation menu I'm setting keyframes, one for each time interval, turning each layer on in secession. In the Timeline window I see the correct keyframe thumbnails, and if I advance the frames manually from the Playback menu they change as expected. But, if I hit play on the Playback menu the screen goes blank and I just see the time slide moving but no map. If I export as a Draft or GIF I get export files with only the basemap showing, my layers are missing. What is going on with my animation?
... View more
10-11-2019
09:56 AM
|
0
|
4
|
1406
|
POST
|
I'm working with historical mining maps and trying to visualize mine shafts below the surface in a 3d WebScene. The process in ArcScene is to just apply a negative extrusion to a flat polygon layer relative to an elevation surface. This same process works for positive extrusions in the web scene, but as soon as a negative value is used the polygon disappears. Underground navigation is on and the base map is set to [none] with the default ground set to partially transparent. Is the My Scene app not able to visualize underground or subsurface features?
... View more
09-05-2019
01:53 PM
|
0
|
0
|
500
|
POST
|
I'm helping a colleague with a historic map of a portion of the Nevada gold mining regions from mid 1800's. The map shows claim foot prints along with some very general information for mine shafts (entrance location, general layout in plan view only, and elevations for top, bottom and every junction along the shaft). We want to visualize the mines in 3d to some extent and have pulled the map and an elevation surface into ArcScene. One idea I have for a basic sub surface visualization is to show the mine shafts as 3d features (cylinders or rectangular prisms) that descend below the surface and angle away in main direction of the shaft. We don't have detailed profile schematics, but the top and bottom shaft elevations combined with plan view locations for the top and bottom of the shaft ends should be enough to create these general shapes. But I'm not sure what the right workflow is. I know how to extrude flat shapes into 3d shapes from attributes, but I can't angle these away. Is there a method for connecting two xy endpoints at different z values and extruding a volume between them?
... View more
08-21-2019
12:42 PM
|
0
|
0
|
815
|
POST
|
Incidentally ArcPro handles these raster with unknown VCS that same way 10.4.1 did, by assuming "unknown" = "none" and moving on with the projection. The output image file will have "no VCS" in its properties instead of "unknown". I suspect this is actually a bug in 10.5.1.
... View more
10-25-2017
03:36 PM
|
0
|
0
|
699
|
POST
|
In upgrading from ArcGIS 10.4.1 to 10.5.1 I've noticed that ArcMap seems to handle raster coordinate system info a little differently now. We have an older set of 10m NED elevation rasters on our data server. In 10.4.1 these files could be re projected from their native GCS NAD 83 to any other common projected system. No errors. In 10.5.1 the same input raster will not project because Arc interprets the vertical coordinate system as "unknown" and the project raster tool hangs. If I check the reference system in the image properties in 10.4.1 I can't see any lines for the VCS. In 10.5.1 there are VCS properties for the same image and they are set to "unknown" (unknown VCS datum...). If I redefine the input raster and set the VCS on the Z coordinate system tab all works ok in 10.5.1 even if the output of project raster is set to have no VCS! The issue is, I don't understand why ArcMap suddenly cares if the VCS is set? The input file is the same in both 10.4.1 and 10.5.1. In 10.4.1 Arc seems to interpret an unknown VCS as "no VCS", in 10.5.1 it seems like I have to explicitly tell it it's no VCS or set a real VCS. What has changed about VCS handling in ArcMap at 10.5.1?
... View more
10-25-2017
03:12 PM
|
0
|
3
|
996
|
POST
|
Thanks Dan. I was hoping Timothy would have been able to get the info direct form the GP dev team. I'll pass your suggestion on to the researcher.
... View more
02-09-2017
10:49 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1058
|
POST
|
Hi all, just checking in to see if there's a response from the GP team on this question? Thanks! David
... View more
02-09-2017
10:11 AM
|
0
|
4
|
1058
|
POST
|
Thanks. I'm not actually the researcher in question but am helping track this down for a PhD candidate who's a patron at my center. I don't think he's doing any comparative analysis between algorithms, rather he's compiling reference information for his works defense where he may very likely be asked, "which min spanning tree algorithm did you use?". The answer can't be "I don't know" or "the one Esri uses" ; ) Esri tools usually post the specific algorithm details on the help pages so I was surprised this wasn't there. Unless it really doesn't matter in practical terms which is used?
... View more
01-23-2017
01:50 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1058
|
POST
|
I have a student who is using the Cost Connectivity tools in ArcGIS for his research who needs to know the specific algorithm being used in the tool to determine the minimum spanning tree. The ArcGIS online help only refers to the linked wikipedia article for more detail on the method, but there are several algorithms listed there. How can he determine the specific one being used in the arcGIS tool? How the Cost Connectivity tool works—Help | ArcGIS Desktop Minimum spanning tree - Wikipedia
... View more
01-23-2017
01:17 PM
|
0
|
12
|
2920
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 08-19-2013 03:47 PM | |
1 | 06-09-2022 09:41 AM | |
3 | 03-15-2021 03:02 PM | |
2 | 05-10-2022 11:17 AM | |
1 | 09-03-2015 11:17 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
05-21-2024
12:05 AM
|