Latest Contributions by JohnMDye

‎05-30-2019

That's a fair point and I could concede that perhaps pricing everything in US dollars would not be the best thing to do. Still, Esri could implement some much more robust credit controls for administrators and do many of the other things I mentioned to make credit usage much more transparent and easier to manage.

‎05-06-2019

ArcGIS Pro already ships with a ColorBrewer palette which, if you look at the documentation at ColorBrewer: Color Advice for Maps has some solid recommendations for print-friendly, display-friendly and color-blind friendly palettes. Or are we talking about recoloring basemaps as well?

‎05-06-2019

Thanks Kory, I did know about AppStream 2.0 and looked into using it. Unfortunately the AWS pricing for it seems to be geared more towards corportate/enteprise use than indiivdual use. Put simply, unless you plan to get daily usage out of it for several hours at a time, AppStream is a lot more expensive and somewhat more complicated than a simple GPU enabled workspace to set up, configure and manage. Not to mention there’s no cost for an AWS Workspace when its shut down as long as you remain within the included storage quotas. AppStream is a great option for enterprise/corporate users that can manage those costs and achieve economies of scale compared to the traditional approach of leasing workstations from Dell or HP, but for Devs who need incidental access to a powerful ArcGIS Workstation, AppStream doesn't make much economical sense. This seems like relatively low hanging fruit, but I'm sure there's probably more to it than my feeble mind is accounting for.

‎05-06-2019

Thanks Kory, I did know about AppStream 2.0 and looked into using it. Unfortunately the AWS pricing for it seems to be geared more towards corportate/enteprise use than indiivdual use. Put simply, unless you plan to get daily usage out of it for several hours at a time, AppStream is a lot more expensive and somewhat more complicated than a simple GPU enabled workspace to set up, configure and manage. Not to mention there’s no cost for an AWS Workspace when its shut down as long as you remain within the included storage quotas. AppStream is a great option for enterprise/corporate users that can manage those costs and achieve economies of scale compared to the traditional approach of leasing workstations from Dell or HP, but for Devs who need incidental access to a powerful ArcGIS Workstation, AppStream doesn't make much economical sense. This seems like relatively low hanging fruit, but I'm sure there's probably more to it than my feeble mind is accounting for.

‎05-06-2019

Thanks Kory, I did know about AppStream 2.0 and looked into using it. Unfortunately the AWS pricing for it seems to be geared more towards corportate/enteprise use than indiivdual use. Put simply, unless you plan to get daily usage out of it for several hours at a time, AppStream is a lot more expensive and somewhat more complicated than a simple GPU enabled workspace to set up, configure and manage. Not to mention there’s no cost for an AWS Workspace when its shut down as long as you remain within the included storage quotas. AppStream is a great option for enterprise/corporate users that can manage those costs and achieve economies of scale compared to the traditional approach of leasing workstations from Dell or HP, but for Devs who need incidental access to a powerful ArcGIS Workstation, AppStream doesn't make much economical sense. This seems like relatively low hanging fruit, but I'm sure there's probably more to it than my feeble mind is accounting for.

‎05-06-2019

Thanks Kory, I did know about AppStream 2.0 and looked into using it. Unfortunately the AWS pricing for it seems to be geared more towards corportate/enteprise use than indiivdual use. Put simply, unless you plan to get daily usage out of it for several hours at a time, AppStream is a lot more expensive and somewhat more complicated than a simple GPU enabled workspace to set up, configure and manage. Not to mention there’s no cost for an AWS Workspace when its shut down as long as you remain within the included storage quotas. AppStream is a great option for enterprise/corporate users that can manage those costs and achieve economies of scale compared to the traditional approach of leasing workstations from Dell or HP, but for Devs who need incidental access to a powerful ArcGIS Workstation, AppStream doesn't make much economical sense. This seems like relatively low hanging fruit, but I'm sure there's probably more to it than my feeble mind is accounting for.

‎05-06-2019

Thanks Kory, I did know about AppStream 2.0 and looked into using it. Unfortunately the AWS pricing for it seems to be geared more towards corportate/enteprise use than indiivdual use. Put simply, unless you plan to get daily usage out of it for several hours at a time, AppStream is a lot more expensive and somewhat more complicated than a simple GPU enabled workspace to set up, configure and manage. Not to mention there’s no cost for an AWS Workspace when its shut down as long as you remain within the included storage quotas. AppStream is a great option for enterprise/corporate users that can manage those costs and achieve economies of scale compared to the traditional approach of leasing workstations from Dell or HP, but for Devs who need incidental access to a powerful ArcGIS Workstation, AppStream doesn't make much economical sense. This seems like relatively low hanging fruit, but I'm sure there's probably more to it than my feeble mind is accounting for.

‎05-06-2019

Thanks Kory, I did know about AppStream 2.0 and looked into using it. Unfortunately the AWS pricing for it seems to be geared more towards corportate/enteprise use than indiivdual use. Put simply, unless you plan to get daily usage out of it for several hours at a time, AppStream is a lot more expensive and somewhat more complicated than a simple GPU enabled workspace to set up, configure and manage. Not to mention there’s no cost for an AWS Workspace when its shut down as long as you remain within the included storage quotas. AppStream is a great option for enterprise/corporate users that can manage those costs and achieve economies of scale compared to the traditional approach of leasing workstations from Dell or HP, but for Devs who need incidental access to a powerful ArcGIS Workstation, AppStream doesn't make much economical sense. This seems like relatively low hanging fruit, but I'm sure there's probably more to it than my feeble mind is accounting for.

‎05-06-2019

Thanks Kory, I did know about AppStream 2.0 and looked into using it. Unfortunately the AWS pricing for it seems to be geared more towards corportate/enteprise use than indiivdual use. Put simply, unless you plan to get daily usage out of it for several hours at a time, AppStream is a lot more expensive and somewhat more complicated than a simple GPU enabled workspace to set up, configure and manage. Not to mention there’s no cost for an AWS Workspace when its shut down as long as you remain within the included storage quotas. AppStream is a great option for enterprise/corporate users that can manage those costs and achieve economies of scale compared to the traditional approach of leasing workstations from Dell or HP, but for Devs who need incidental access to a powerful ArcGIS Workstation, AppStream doesn't make much economical sense. This seems like relatively low hanging fruit, but I'm sure there's probably more to it than my feeble mind is accounting for.

‎05-06-2019

Thanks Kory, I did know about AppStream 2.0 and looked into using it. Unfortunately the AWS pricing for it seems to be geared more towards corportate/enteprise use than indiivdual use. Put simply, unless you plan to get daily usage out of it for several hours at a time, AppStream is a lot more expensive and somewhat more complicated than a simple GPU enabled workspace to set up, configure and manage. Not to mention there’s no cost for an AWS Workspace when its shut down as long as you remain within the included storage quotas. AppStream is a great option for enterprise/corporate users that can manage those costs and achieve economies of scale compared to the traditional approach of leasing workstations from Dell or HP, but for Devs who need incidental access to a powerful ArcGIS Workstation, AppStream doesn't make much economical sense. This seems like relatively low hanging fruit, but I'm sure there's probably more to it than my feeble mind is accounting for.

‎05-06-2019

Thanks Kory, I did know about AppStream 2.0 and looked into using it. Unfortunately the AWS pricing for it seems to be geared more towards corportate/enteprise use than indiivdual use. Put simply, unless you plan to get daily usage out of it for several hours at a time, AppStream is a lot more expensive and somewhat more complicated than a simple GPU enabled workspace to set up, configure and manage. Not to mention there’s no cost for an AWS Workspace when its shut down as long as you remain within the included storage quotas. AppStream is a great option for enterprise/corporate users that can manage those costs and achieve economies of scale compared to the traditional approach of leasing workstations from Dell or HP, but for Devs who need incidental access to a powerful ArcGIS Workstation, AppStream doesn't make much economical sense. This seems like relatively low hanging fruit, but I'm sure there's probably more to it than my feeble mind is accounting for.

‎05-04-2019

Like many devs, I do a lot of my work on a Mac. When I need to run an ArcGIS thick-client application, this leaves me with only a couple of options for my system, none of which are great: I can have a separate, dedicated windows laptop that I carry with me everywhere Certainly feasible but what a pain in the butt. Also, if you actually want a powerful computer, you talking 5.5-7lbs minimum. I can have a separate, dedicated windows desktop that I remote into This is a little more reasonable except that my dedicated desktop needs to be running 24/7 so that I can remote into it when needed. I can run a Virtual Machine on my MacBook Pro Historically, this has been what I've done as it keeps everything local and I don't have to worry about internet connectivity. But in this day and age, internet connectivity is rarely a problem anymore. The biggest problem I've found here is that it's difficult to get a really powerful Windows VM without investing in $4k+ MacBook Pro and even then, you end up with a rather mediocre windows workstation rather than something that could really crunch some data. There is another option. I could pay-per-hour for an AWS Workspace. This would allow me to fire up a Windows system with Pro on it whenever I needed it, and shut it down when I didn't without issue. The only problem is that ArcGIS applications such as Pro, ArcMap, CityEngine, Drone2Map, etc. are not available in the AWS Marketplace. That's not an insurmountable challenge. I could certainly download the application installers and upload them to my AWS Application Manager and to get them installed, but why should I need to? Esri should be making this easy for me. There are already some lightweight GIS and mapping applications in the AWS Marketplace, but nothing heavyweight. I'd also argue that Esri needs to get on this train before QGIS does. It would be nice to be able to select any of the ArcGIS thick client applications from this list: ArcGIS Pro ArcMap/Catalog/Scene/Globe CityEngine Drone2Map AppStudio Business Analyst Collector & Explorer (Win10) Survey123 Connect Maps for Office Named User licensing would be ideal for this kind of setup and for the legacy apps, one could just use a provisioning file. From there, whenever you need an ArcGIS workstation, just hit AWS and fire up your workspace.

‎05-04-2019

Like many devs, I do a lot of my work on a Mac. When I need to run an ArcGIS thick-client application, this leaves me with only a couple of options for my system, none of which are great: I can have a separate, dedicated windows laptop that I carry with me everywhere Certainly feasible but what a pain in the butt. Also, if you actually want a powerful computer, you talking 5.5-7lbs minimum. I can have a separate, dedicated windows desktop that I remote into This is a little more reasonable except that my dedicated desktop needs to be running 24/7 so that I can remote into it when needed. I can run a Virtual Machine on my MacBook Pro Historically, this has been what I've done as it keeps everything local and I don't have to worry about internet connectivity. But in this day and age, internet connectivity is rarely a problem anymore. The biggest problem I've found here is that it's difficult to get a really powerful Windows VM without investing in $4k+ MacBook Pro and even then, you end up with a rather mediocre windows workstation rather than something that could really crunch some data. There is another option. I could pay-per-hour for an AWS Workspace. This would allow me to fire up a Windows system with Pro on it whenever I needed it, and shut it down when I didn't without issue. The only problem is that ArcGIS applications such as Pro, ArcMap, CityEngine, Drone2Map, etc. are not available in the AWS Marketplace. That's not an insurmountable challenge. I could certainly download the application installers and upload them to my AWS Application Manager and to get them installed, but why should I need to? Esri should be making this easy for me. There are already some lightweight GIS and mapping applications in the AWS Marketplace, but nothing heavyweight. I'd also argue that Esri needs to get on this train before QGIS does. It would be nice to be able to select any of the ArcGIS thick client applications from this list: ArcGIS Pro ArcMap/Catalog/Scene/Globe CityEngine Drone2Map AppStudio Business Analyst Collector & Explorer (Win10) Survey123 Connect Maps for Office Named User licensing would be ideal for this kind of setup and for the legacy apps, one could just use a provisioning file. From there, whenever you need an ArcGIS workstation, just hit AWS and fire up your workspace.

‎05-04-2019

Like many devs, I do a lot of my work on a Mac. When I need to run an ArcGIS thick-client application, this leaves me with only a couple of options for my system, none of which are great: I can have a separate, dedicated windows laptop that I carry with me everywhere Certainly feasible but what a pain in the butt. Also, if you actually want a powerful computer, you talking 5.5-7lbs minimum. I can have a separate, dedicated windows desktop that I remote into This is a little more reasonable except that my dedicated desktop needs to be running 24/7 so that I can remote into it when needed. I can run a Virtual Machine on my MacBook Pro Historically, this has been what I've done as it keeps everything local and I don't have to worry about internet connectivity. But in this day and age, internet connectivity is rarely a problem anymore. The biggest problem I've found here is that it's difficult to get a really powerful Windows VM without investing in $4k+ MacBook Pro and even then, you end up with a rather mediocre windows workstation rather than something that could really crunch some data. There is another option. I could pay-per-hour for an AWS Workspace. This would allow me to fire up a Windows system with Pro on it whenever I needed it, and shut it down when I didn't without issue. The only problem is that ArcGIS applications such as Pro, ArcMap, CityEngine, Drone2Map, etc. are not available in the AWS Marketplace. That's not an insurmountable challenge. I could certainly download the application installers and upload them to my AWS Application Manager and to get them installed, but why should I need to? Esri should be making this easy for me. There are already some lightweight GIS and mapping applications in the AWS Marketplace, but nothing heavyweight. I'd also argue that Esri needs to get on this train before QGIS does. It would be nice to be able to select any of the ArcGIS thick client applications from this list: ArcGIS Pro ArcMap/Catalog/Scene/Globe CityEngine Drone2Map AppStudio Business Analyst Collector & Explorer (Win10) Survey123 Connect Maps for Office Named User licensing would be ideal for this kind of setup and for the legacy apps, one could just use a provisioning file. From there, whenever you need an ArcGIS workstation, just hit AWS and fire up your workspace.

‎05-04-2019

Like many devs, I do a lot of my work on a Mac. When I need to run an ArcGIS thick-client application, this leaves me with only a couple of options for my system, none of which are great: I can have a separate, dedicated windows laptop that I carry with me everywhere Certainly feasible but what a pain in the butt. Also, if you actually want a powerful computer, you talking 5.5-7lbs minimum. I can have a separate, dedicated windows desktop that I remote into This is a little more reasonable except that my dedicated desktop needs to be running 24/7 so that I can remote into it when needed. I can run a Virtual Machine on my MacBook Pro Historically, this has been what I've done as it keeps everything local and I don't have to worry about internet connectivity. But in this day and age, internet connectivity is rarely a problem anymore. The biggest problem I've found here is that it's difficult to get a really powerful Windows VM without investing in $4k+ MacBook Pro and even then, you end up with a rather mediocre windows workstation rather than something that could really crunch some data. There is another option. I could pay-per-hour for an AWS Workspace. This would allow me to fire up a Windows system with Pro on it whenever I needed it, and shut it down when I didn't without issue. The only problem is that ArcGIS applications such as Pro, ArcMap, CityEngine, Drone2Map, etc. are not available in the AWS Marketplace. That's not an insurmountable challenge. I could certainly download the application installers and upload them to my AWS Application Manager and to get them installed, but why should I need to? Esri should be making this easy for me. There are already some lightweight GIS and mapping applications in the AWS Marketplace, but nothing heavyweight. I'd also argue that Esri needs to get on this train before QGIS does. It would be nice to be able to select any of the ArcGIS thick client applications from this list: ArcGIS Pro ArcMap/Catalog/Scene/Globe CityEngine Drone2Map AppStudio Business Analyst Collector & Explorer (Win10) Survey123 Connect Maps for Office Named User licensing would be ideal for this kind of setup and for the legacy apps, one could just use a provisioning file. From there, whenever you need an ArcGIS workstation, just hit AWS and fire up your workspace.

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	‎05-19-2023 08:06 PM

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by JohnMDye

Re: Just Get RID of the CREDITS!!!!

Re: Colorblind mode in ArcGIS for cartographic design

Re: Add ArcGIS Applications to AWS Marketplace

Re: Add ArcGIS Applications to AWS Marketplace

Re: Add ArcGIS Applications to AWS Marketplace

Re: Add ArcGIS Applications to AWS Marketplace

Re: Add ArcGIS Applications to AWS Marketplace

Re: Add ArcGIS Applications to AWS Marketplace

Re: Add ArcGIS Applications to AWS Marketplace

Re: Add ArcGIS Applications to AWS Marketplace

Re: Add ArcGIS Applications to AWS Marketplace

Add ArcGIS Applications to AWS Marketplace

Add ArcGIS Applications to AWS Marketplace

Add ArcGIS Applications to AWS Marketplace

Add ArcGIS Applications to AWS Marketplace

Enable Editing & Editor Tracking via Python API

Date-Range Domains - what gives

App Studio for iPad

Is it possible to set the field length when publis...

Re: How do you edit a hosted feature service in Ar...