|
POST
|
You should be able to acquire locks outside of a tool. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/production/roads-highways/lrs-locks-table.htm
... View more
02-10-2025
10:39 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1316
|
|
POST
|
A few strategies we have used, while not at Pro we will still most likely do a scheduled quarterly downtime. In traditional versioning we went to state zero but when we also would make database changes and take a data cut. That would be time period we could schedule such work. Another method, with 7 lrs editors and 15 event editors in the system there can be lots of different locks in the system. We would break down the work by smaller boundary area where people are not working like a county or a collection of counties. That can handle 95% or more of the work effort. Easy enough to have the business unit get out of their own way for an event update. Our lrs editors are posting every few days when complete with work and easy enough to work around a few exclude routes and updating the rest of county until a route lock is removed or a little coordination on needing a few minutes to update has work effectively in the past. Instead of allowing the tool to grab a lock to edit, I would grab a route lock or an event lock at minimum first than process the action on that same selection. That might get around the 99999 issues. If updating monthly, I would think about pulling out that field out of that feature class to another feature class to make doing append events a simpler effort. You can do the work outside R&H and add later. Just a thought. I am sure there is some other creative solutions to update data changing that often.
... View more
02-10-2025
05:11 AM
|
0
|
5
|
1355
|
|
POST
|
01-08-2025
11:56 AM
|
0
|
0
|
587
|
|
POST
|
January's agenda and connection information has been posted.
... View more
01-07-2025
12:38 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1114
|
|
POST
|
12-12-2024
10:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
562
|
|
POST
|
Poll results: 1.Which design do you prefer? A. Extra rows 21/62 ( 34%) B. Extra columns 19/62 ( 31%) C. Extra values 8/62 ( 13%) D. No preference 13/62 ( 21%) No Answer 0/62 ( 0%)
... View more
11-20-2024
05:45 AM
|
0
|
0
|
654
|
|
POST
|
11-13-2024
12:04 PM
|
0
|
1
|
744
|
|
POST
|
10-10-2024
04:27 AM
|
0
|
0
|
654
|
|
POST
|
October's agenda and meeting information has been updated.
... View more
10-07-2024
05:30 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1302
|
|
POST
|
09-12-2024
03:56 AM
|
0
|
1
|
691
|
|
POST
|
Katrina, Glad you can still listen later. You can download the pdf, at the end we add all the public chat messages. You can find Cameron’s email there. If not, let me know. Ryan
... View more
08-30-2024
04:05 AM
|
1
|
0
|
774
|
|
POST
|
08-15-2024
08:40 AM
|
0
|
2
|
880
|
|
POST
|
I would probably go with a field for each event (cracking) called lane and use a coded domain for types but we have not tried something like that so I am not sure of the pro/cons on that direction. Another option/thought is to look at this post of a few other states data model to see if they have something similar. https://community.esri.com/t5/roads-and-highways-user-group-rhug-questions/roads-and-highways-data-model-discussion/m-p/785712 DC DOT had something closer to what I think your trying to model. I don't recall who took over for James Graham (with cyclomedia now) when he left that could explain it better but I found this article. https://www.gis.fhwa.dot.gov/newsletters/Newsletter_July2018.pdf
... View more
08-15-2024
03:57 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1347
|
|
POST
|
I know some states have the street name in the route id so the field has to be variable. You can set the routeid as text or concatenation. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/location-referencing/modify-route-id-padding.htm How you are you currently modeling the geometry for the lanes? Do you have one centerline for each lane or all the lanes? You could model either way. Main difference comes down when you make changes to the alignment of the route. Do you want to do the change once or many times (once for each lane)? That is a business decision. You could have single centerline geometry for the route and an event for cracking that had fields for lane value and cracking value. All or some event feature classes could be set up like that. You could combine cracking, skid resistance, fwd etc in one or many feature classes. The more changes in the values, the more likely I would be to separate the different feature classes. Again, that's a business decision. You could have a single centerline geometry for each lane and an event for cracking with just a field for cracking value. You could have single centerline geometry for the route and stack each lane as a separate routeid and an event for cracking with just a field for cracking value. Just case it’s possible doesn’t mean it’s the best option. I think this might be too messy but it’s a business decision. Hope that helps some. Ryan
... View more
08-13-2024
04:41 AM
|
2
|
0
|
1450
|
|
POST
|
07-10-2024
01:13 PM
|
0
|
0
|
577
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 08-18-2022 03:59 AM | |
| 1 | 08-30-2024 04:05 AM | |
| 1 | 08-15-2024 03:57 AM | |
| 1 | 02-01-2024 03:46 AM | |
| 2 | 08-13-2024 04:41 AM |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
8 hours ago
|