Latest Contributions by Miralem_Zeljo

This seemed to be intermittent issue and after creating new project it behaved normally and I was able to add control points to georeferenced pdf. ... View more

I am currently working to set up a planar basemap and publish it to ArcGIS Online, but I have been unable to find comprehensive guidance on the full workflow. My goal is to configure a grid in feet and define cell sizes (e.g., 1x1, 2x2, or 10x10 feet). I would appreciate any insights or best practices others may have on achieving this. Additionally, it would be highly beneficial if this level of grid control could be supported independently of the basemap in the future. While the feature itself is very useful, its current limitations and complexity make it challenging to implement effectively. ... View more

That is a great tip, but it does add complexity compared to other applications that had measure tool available where you can chose what unit of measure you want (Planar/Geodesic) I hope this is something that can be implemented into web editor. Appreciate the response. Thank you! ... View more

I’m aware of the Transform tool, but it doesn’t solve the core issue we’re running into. A significant portion of the CAD files we receive—especially from third parties—are either unprojected, inconsistently projected, or come in with incorrect scaling relative to our basemap imagery. While we can manually correct these using existing tools, the problem is that this becomes a repetitive, time-consuming process that we have to redo over and over again for the same file with new versions. What we really need is the ability to dynamically stretch or adjust CAD data so it aligns with our projection and imagery—similar to how we can handle PDFs or raster datasets. That kind of functionality would eliminate a huge amount of redundant work and significantly improve efficiency in our workflows. We already make every effort to project CAD files correctly on our end, but when incoming data doesn’t follow the same standards, we’re left constantly fixing the same issues instead of moving forward with actual production work. This isn’t just a minor inconvenience—it’s a recurring bottleneck. Having a more flexible, persistent adjustment method for CAD data would make a meaningful impact on productivity and data consistency across projects. I strongly hope this is something that can be implemented. ... View more

I will check it out. Appreciate quick feedback. ... View more

Agree, I posted new idea in the right place. thank you for calling that out. https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-web-editor-ideas/measure-tool-in-web-editor/idi-p/1692369 I have changed this idea to ARC Pro related functionality. ... View more

I’m honestly surprised this idea only has 2 Kudos. The ability to set default units of measure should be standard functionality and configurable based on user needs. Many of us work in environments where miles or feet are not the preferred units, yet the Dashboard measure tool currently limits us to only those two options. For teams working with metric standards or project-specific unit requirements, this creates unnecessary friction and inconsistency in workflows. A simple setting to define default measurement units would significantly improve usability and align the tool with real-world operational needs. What makes this even more limiting is that we have not been able to find any programmable workaround. There is currently no way to override or control the measurement units through configuration, scripting, or customization. That removes flexibility for power users and organizations that rely heavily on automation and standardized environments. With over 2,000 views and four years since the idea was posted, it clearly reflects a genuine demand. I strongly support giving this idea more visibility and prioritizing this enhancement. Best regards, Miralem Zeljo ... View more

It is good to see that I am not the only one confused as to what the difference is and why half the time package tool does not even work when you try to package PPKX. We found that creating APTX works best and then we rename it to PPKX so it can be opened by Arc Pro with a double click. APTX you have to use as new project from template option. I am hoping that this process can be simplified and we can get to creating PPKX files without all the extra hoops. ... View more