|
POST
|
I think this is due to a know bug with the MeasureAction in Web Mercator in the 2.2 beta... sounds like it will be fixed in the next beta or final. Check out this post: http://forums.arcgis.com/threads/27909-MeasureAction-in-Web-Mercator-Issues... Hope that helps.
... View more
04-25-2011
12:39 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1098
|
|
POST
|
Hey Morten, Thanks a lot for that reply.. The ExtentChanging works... and you are right the user does not need all 50,000 points, BUT, what they do need is an accurate count of points that are contained in the cluster, and this is not possible without downloading all the points, right? If it is not downloaded, then it is not counted in the cluster... And the initial extent of the map will cover the area of all 50,000 points, and the users would like to see this cluster at this extent. But as far as the features go, they do not need to see them until zoomed way in, and "OnDemand" is perfect for this. Also, the "on demand map tip" you showed off will be great too. I was actually at this DevSummit session and that plus several user requests have inspired us to move from a dynamic service layer to a feature layer with map tips and clustering :). This data really fits the clustering concept well, would be nice if the cluster could be generated server side. Thanks a lot for the help! And that great DevSummit session�?� please let me know if you have any more ideas.
... View more
04-18-2011
01:40 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2232
|
|
POST
|
Looks like the 2.2 beta fixes this... woohoo! Thanks a lot WPF team!!!
... View more
04-14-2011
05:26 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1134
|
|
POST
|
Ok, I know a am pushing the limits here with 50,000 points, but what we would like almost works... These 50,000 points spread across different areas in California, but some points are pretty close together, within feet. So the initial extent of the map is zoomed out to roughly the California area, the AGS service is set to return up to 75,000 points, and the FeatureLayer is setup as this:
<esri:FeatureLayer ID="Well" Url="http://bkgis02/ArcGIS/rest/services/Global/Well-FeatureLayer/MapServer/0" Mode="OnDemand" OnDemandCacheSize="75000" OutFields="WELL_NME,WELL_API_NBR">
<esri:FeatureLayer.MapTip>
...
Since it is loading all these points initially, I figured I might as well cache them all... it takes about 10 seconds to load all the points and create the initial cluster (I give the user a progress bar). First question, is this a bad idea? I am ok with this one time initial wait... Once loaded, the cluster works good, as I zoom in and pan around it responds pretty quickly... But since some of these points are pretty close, when the extent gets pretty far in, I would like to drop the cluster. I have tried this in two ways: Option 1:
void Map_ExtentChanged(Object sender, ExtentEventArgs e)
{
FeatureLayer featureLayer = ((FeatureLayer)Map.Layers[7]);
if (Map.Resolution > 2)
{
if (featureLayer.Clusterer == null)
featureLayer.Clusterer = flareClusterer;
}
else
featureLayer.Clusterer = null;
}
Option 2:
void Map_ExtentChanged(object sender, ExtentEventArgs e)
{
if (Map.Resolution > 3)
Clusterer.Radius = ClusterRadius;
else
Clusterer.Radius = 1; //Radius 0 doesn't work
}
I like option 1 the best and it works really good except for one issue, which option 2 has this same issue too. Zooming in works great, panning works great, but zooming out causes the application to hang. I think the problem lies that when zooming out, the Map is now trying to render thousands of feature points, and it is doing this before the cluster has been set... Any ideas? Am I missing something simple here? A great feature enhancement would be to add a MinimumResolution to Clusters (I might add this in the beta community)... Also, I tried using ExtentChanging instead of ExtentChanged... and this does fix the above issue, but it is causing any panning and zooming to lag too much then... *EDIT* I tweaked the code a bit to make this more efficient, but still seems like overkill Thanks a lot for any help!!! *EDIT* Also, Another issue... while the cluster refreshes real fast, and so do the ESRI imagery tiled layers, the maps progress bar seems to hang... and so does the refreshing of other ArcGISDynamicMapServiceLayers (mostly when zooming out)
... View more
04-11-2011
09:26 AM
|
1
|
6
|
7842
|
|
POST
|
FYI, the buttons are still squished with the 2.2 beta in IE7 with the XBAPs 😞
... View more
04-11-2011
07:24 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2602
|
|
POST
|
Dominique, that�??s music to my ears... Thanks a lot for that info, I will just be patient and wait then. Thanks!
... View more
04-11-2011
06:56 AM
|
0
|
0
|
506
|
|
POST
|
In the spirit of testing our current web maps with the 2.2 beta, I am also looking into moving from using WGS_1984 to WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere, since this seems to be the way things are going (and we want to use ESRI's latest imagery). After pulling my hair for a bit trying to figure out why the distances given by the MeasureAction were about 20% larger than they should be, I found this article: http://blogs.esri.com/Dev/blogs/arcgisserver/archive/2010/03/05/Measuring-distances-and-areas-when-your-map-uses-the-Mercator-projection.aspx Sooo, I don't know what to do now... any guidance would be great: - I don't see any way to tell the MeasureAction to work in a different coordinate system... - What good is the MeasureAction if it there is no way to get proper values from it? Am I missing something simple? Or is it a bug? Or should I submit a feature enhancement? - If I keep the map in WGS_1984, and bring in a Web_Mercator service, it doesn't even show up... so no using the current imagery that way. - All our maps and data are in California, so I need it to be accurate within that area. I am hoping I am just missing something simple here... but any helping getting us moved to Web Mercator would be great! Thanks a lot!
... View more
04-09-2011
06:49 PM
|
0
|
2
|
865
|
|
POST
|
Wenxue, Thanks a lot for looking into this issue!!! I have converted our rasters in the dataset to a different coordinate system to solve for now. Thanks!
... View more
04-02-2011
06:26 AM
|
0
|
0
|
761
|
|
POST
|
David, We are using XBAPs with IE, but not disconnected (so can't help you there)... We started off with Silverlight, but then for a few reasons moved to WPF: 1) We could use functionality in custom .NET libraries we already have. 2) We want to embedd the maps in other windows applications, and have bi-directional communication between them, so we can just as easily compile as a stande alone app too. 3) Plus having full .NET availalbe is nice :). But other than a few layout/graphical glitches that were fixed by tweaking the controls template... they work great! Also found a few issues with touch screens, for example with the legend control, the scroll bars intercept the touch and do not pass down to its child controls (like a slider bar), and this issue does not exist in SL. But all in all, works good for us. But we started when SL3 was out, and as SL keeps getting more robust with every version, we might have to switch one day. Anyway, hope that helps a bit, sorry I can't comment on working disconnected.
... View more
03-23-2011
05:23 PM
|
0
|
0
|
810
|
|
POST
|
Hi Chris, we are using IE7 with the XBAP applications... I will try our apps out with the 2.2 beta in the next few days (and remove the custom style) to see if it is ok. Thanks!
... View more
03-14-2011
08:19 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2602
|
|
POST
|
hmm, that�??s a bummer. Thanks for the clarification Morten!
... View more
02-04-2011
06:34 AM
|
0
|
0
|
508
|
|
POST
|
So I have been using the ESRI_Imagery_World_2D as our background layer for our web maps... I see that this service is now in Extended support so I was going to switch to the World_Imagery service (and WGS 84 Web Mercator). But when I zoom in too far I get tiles that say "Map data not yet available"... is there a way to not show these and still zoom in on the layer? Bringing this same service into ArcMap I do not see these not available tiles... sure it gets blurry, but I prefer that over nothing. Also, a side question: what is the difference between server.arcgisonline.com and services.arcgisonline.com? Are they pointing to the same server? Thanks a lot!
... View more
02-03-2011
03:50 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1091
|
|
POST
|
Good news, thanks a lot ravi! For the time being I am making a seperate Query operation with the TimeExtent to get the OID of the visible feature and then plugging it in the MosaicRule. *EDIT* Another issue with the Identify on a mosaic dataset is that it does not obey the transformations assigned to the mosaic. Visually the images are showing right, but when performing an identify they are off... i posted about this issue already here: http://forums.arcgis.com/threads/20948-Image-Service-Identify-Not-Obeying-Transformations Thanks again!
... View more
01-18-2011
08:07 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1728
|
|
POST
|
Thanks a lot for the information ravi! Maybe in the future we will be able to specify the transformation? Thanks!
... View more
01-18-2011
08:06 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2250
|
|
POST
|
Did you try the MeasureAction in WPF on a touch screen? With the slider, I don't think it is a tolerance or size issue... I can clearly select the slider's thumb. I think it is due to the fact that the Legend/Treeview control has scroll bars (only visible if needed) and those are capturing the touch slide gesture. Thanks Jennifer!
... View more
01-18-2011
05:59 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1812
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10-24-2023 10:43 AM | |
| 1 | 10-02-2023 02:23 PM | |
| 1 | 11-16-2016 02:05 PM | |
| 1 | 07-05-2017 09:30 AM | |
| 15 | 11-19-2010 08:05 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
05-01-2024
08:25 PM
|