|
IDEA
|
ArcGIS Portal really needs the capability to create and manage relationship classes in the web interface of ArcGIS Portal. One option is to have a way to create or manage related features or tables in the Settings tab on a feature, or map, service Item Details page. Another option that comes to mind is a new Relationship Class item type that allows you to define the relationship settings in the Settings tab on the Item Details page. I think the solution should work for both hosted and traditional services. We currently use Relationship Classes in an Enterprise Geodatabase. However, those do not seem to be recognized when using bulk publishing, or if related features are published as two different services and added to a web map or ArcGIS Pro.
... View more
12-10-2020
12:32 PM
|
18
|
5
|
5233
|
|
POST
|
The Public Information configurable app template is no longer being offered or supported as of the December 8, 2020 update to ArcGIS Online. Esri now recommends using the Media Map template. More info can be found in an Esri's blog post back in October: Configurable Apps Announcement – Apps Scheduled to move to Mature Support Phase December 2020 (esri.com) Short version is your existing maps will continue to operate, but Esri will no longer support the Public Information template or let you use it for new maps.
... View more
12-10-2020
07:09 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1332
|
|
POST
|
I would just like to provide a word of caution when manually registering the Field Maps app with ArcGIS Enterprise (AGE). Be sure to post a reminder somewhere to check to see if you need to unregister the Field Maps app before upgrading to a newer version of AGE. A few years ago, I was upgrading to a new version of AGE and the upgrade process for ArcGIS Portal failed because it was trying to register Survey123 twice. I had manually registered Survey123 with our AGE install, but the version of AGE that I was trying to upgrade to was the first version with Survey123 registered by default. I think this issue also happened when ArcGIS Collector was first released. Hopefully the new installers now check to see if an Esri app is already registered before trying to register it again during an upgrade, but I recommend checking to make sure it will not be an issue. Please do not misunderstand, I do not want to scare anyone away from using Field Maps. I myself am really looking forward to migrating to Field Maps. Maybe someone from Esri can clarify if the issue I mentioned has been resolved?
... View more
12-02-2020
08:24 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3254
|
|
IDEA
|
It would be extremely useful and conserve storage space to have what I would call an attachment repository. The idea being a file is uploaded once and then multiple features in multiple feature classes can be pointed to the same file. The way ArcGIS currently works if for all those features to have that file attached, I must upload the same file for every feature, which causes unnecessary growth of disk storage. For example, say I have a parcel GIS layer and I want to attach a PDF of the plat so my users can quickly review the plat when researching a property. If I have a plat with fifty lots, I must upload fifty copies of the PDF to my geodatabase as attachments. Then let's say the subdivision is re-platted. I now must upload another fifty copies of the replat PDF to the geodatabase. That is one hundred PDFs being stored in the geodatabase when only two PDFs are needed. My concept of an attachment repository is a new item type, like a feature class, mosaic dataset, etc. A geodatabase (or whatever method would be appropriate to store this new item type) could have multiple repositories. The repository should have privileges like any other GIS item. That way you could have curators that manage the repository and users who can only view the files. When a user goes to attach a file to a feature there is an option to upload a new file or add from a repository. Another benefit is if the attachment is updated in the repository then all the features referencing the attachment get the update automatically. Some other ideas are: give users the ability to define metadata fields or tags when creating the attachment repository to help find the correct file make attachment repositories special items in ArcGIS Online/Enterprise to allow for searching and management directly in ArcGIS Online/Enterprise ability to get URLs to files in the repository to embed the URLs in things like web map pop-ups ability to have attachment repositories store login credentials to popular cloud storage solutions so the "attachment" is just a pointer to the file in cloud storage but the ArcGIS user is not prompted to sign in to the cloud storage provided since the repository is handling that. Then if the credentials are changed for the cloud storage provider the credentials only must be updated once per repository instead of for each file. This way organizations have more choices of where to store their files and not be forced to move their files into ArcGIS. I do not want or expect this to be a replacement for a full featured document management solution. However, it could provide the foundation for third party document management solutions to integrate better with ArcGIS, or at least allow small organizations that are already invested in Esri to create a simple document management solution inside their GIS.
... View more
09-23-2020
09:19 AM
|
2
|
0
|
1187
|
|
IDEA
|
It would be extremely useful and conserve storage space to have what I would call an attachment repository. The idea being a file is uploaded once and then multiple features in multiple feature classes can be pointed to the same file. The way ArcGIS currently works if for all those features to have that file attached, I must upload the same file for every feature, which causes unnecessary growth of disk storage. For example, say I have a parcel GIS layer and I want to attach a PDF of the plat so my users can quickly review the plat when researching a property. If I have a plat with fifty lots, I must upload fifty copies of the PDF to my geodatabase as attachments. Then let's say the subdivision is re-platted. I now must upload another fifty copies of the replat PDF to the geodatabase. That is one hundred PDFs being stored in the geodatabase when only two PDFs are needed. My concept of an attachment repository is a new item type, like a feature class, mosaic dataset, etc. A geodatabase (or whatever method would be appropriate to store this new item type) could have multiple repositories. The repository should have privileges like any other GIS item. That way you could have curators that manage the repository and users who can only view the files. When a user goes to attach a file to a feature there is an option to upload a new file or add from a repository. Another benefit is if the attachment is updated in the repository then all the features referencing the attachment get the update automatically. Some other ideas are: give users the ability to define metadata fields or tags when creating the attachment repository to help find the correct file make attachment repositories special items in ArcGIS Online/Enterprise to allow for searching and management directly in ArcGIS Online/Enterprise ability to get URLs to files in the repository to embed the URLs in things like web map pop-ups ability to have attachment repositories store login credentials to popular cloud storage solutions so the "attachment" is just a pointer to the file in cloud storage but the ArcGIS user is not prompted to sign in to the cloud storage provided since the repository is handling that. Then if the credentials are changed for the cloud storage provider the credentials only must be updated once per repository instead of for each file. This way organizations have more choices of where to store their files and not be forced to move their files into ArcGIS. I do not want or expect this to be a replacement for a full featured document management solution. However, it could provide the foundation for third party document management solutions to integrate better with ArcGIS, or at least allow small organizations that are already invested in Esri to create a simple document management solution inside their GIS.
... View more
09-23-2020
09:19 AM
|
0
|
0
|
597
|
|
POST
|
I misunderstood what the ParcelJoinID was being used for. I thought it was used to do a traditional join, but the filtering duplicate results makes a lot of sense. I think Option 2 will accomplish what I am trying to do. Thank you for this information.
... View more
09-10-2020
06:46 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2778
|
|
IDEA
|
I think it would be very useful to have a map property that lets you set a specific map rotation. Then have a second map property to prevent a user changing the rotation by interacting with the map, but still let the rotation be set or changed using the map rotation property. This would be helpful for maps that need a specific rotation that should not change. For example the roads in my town generally run NE/SW and NW/SE so there are times I get requests for maps that are rotated exactly 45° to have the roads run up and down and side to side.
... View more
09-09-2020
12:55 PM
|
2
|
2
|
1411
|
|
POST
|
I went to the trouble of creating a new field in our address points GIS layer to store parcel IDs and populated the field with the ID of the parcel that intersected the address point. However, when creating a new Locator and mapping the ParcelJoinID for the Parcel Role and the Point Address Role nothing is different about the functionality of the locator. Searching for a parcel ID returns the parcel ID and no address information and searching for an address point returns just the address point and no parcel information. The same is true when doing a reverse geocode. The reverse geocode will return either a parcel ID with no address information or an address with no parcel ID. I am testing with parcels that have both a parcel ID and an address point. What does the ParcelJoinID actually do?
... View more
09-08-2020
09:02 AM
|
0
|
3
|
2817
|
|
POST
|
My organization is also experiencing this issue. A member of the hub team was in an edit session to update some of the content on that particular site, but when they went to save they got a 404 message. I am now getting the error as well when I try to edit the site. We have another site and it is still working so far. I have tried different browsers and using InPrivate sessions to clear any caches or cookies.
... View more
08-25-2020
02:06 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1074
|
|
POST
|
I ran into the "Error happened while transforming data" issue a few weeks ago. After some troubleshooting and confirmation from Esri Support, we figured out it was because I have some roads with true curve segments. Upgrading to ArcGIS Pro 2.6 fixed the bug, and for ArcGIS Pro 2.5 exporting the roads to a shapefile fixed the problem because it removes the true curves.
... View more
08-13-2020
12:27 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2937
|
|
DOC
|
Sorry, I forgot to post an update here. I contacted support and they were able to provide the info I needed. I modified a copy of the script that you provided to do incremental backups. So now I have two scripts, batch files, and webgisdr.properties files to handle full and incremental backups on a schedule. I am running the script on a machine that has ArcGIS Portal installed but I didn't realize that the Python environment for Portal does not include the dateutils module. After I got dateutils installed everything is working as expected. Thank you so much for your script. It really helps manage the backups.
... View more
08-07-2020
02:40 PM
|
0
|
0
|
37711
|
|
IDEA
|
I see the new email capability in ArcGIS Enterprise 10.8.1 sends emails based on how soon licenses are expiring. I would like to expand that to create custom delivery schedules for emails designed by admins (separate Idea Add an HTML Email Builder for Emails sent from Portal ). Have the ability to pick one or more dates and times an email should be sent out. This would be great for things like scheduled maintenance. There should also be a UI to see a queue of past and pending scheduled emails, and a way for admins to manage that queue.
... View more
08-06-2020
07:21 AM
|
1
|
0
|
609
|
|
POST
|
I know this thread is old but just in case others are having the issue of hosted feature services being in a hybrid state where ArcGIS Portal thinks the service is a standard feature service but ArcGIS Server thinks it is a hosted feature service. In troubleshooting a different issue I stumbled upon a solution that worked for me. In the Contents directory of ArcGIS Portal every item has a iteminfo.xml file associated with it. This is apparently where Esri marks a feature service as a hosted feature service. In the "<typekeywords>" section make sure there is a typekeyword set as "<typekeyword>Hosted Service</typekeyword>". That is all I had to do. I did not have to restart any services or processes, I just had to refresh the item page in ArcGIS Portal and there were all the settings and options for hosted feature services again. Creating views and changing settings are available again and work. Hosted feature service views require two typekeywords, "<typekeyword>Hosted Service</typekeyword><typekeyword>View Service</typekeyword>". I still wish I knew why the 10.6 to 10.6.1 upgrade stripped the "Hosted Service" typekeyword from ALL the hosting feature services that existed at the time of the upgrade. A year and a half of hosted feature services were rendered unmanageable because of that bug. Hopefully this helps someone else and I would recommend making a backup copy of the XML file before modifying anything.
... View more
07-28-2020
02:57 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1390
|
|
DOC
|
I am looking to start doing daily incremental backups in addition to our weekly full backups. I am having trouble finding documentation on how incremental backups operate. Are incremental backup files automatically deleted once the next full backup is created or do I need to delete them manually? Can multiple incremental backup files be in the same backup directory or do they need to moved to a "Previous" folder as well? I really appreciate the script provided here and all the documentation Esri has on how the full backup process works.
... View more
07-28-2020
07:47 AM
|
0
|
0
|
37711
|
|
IDEA
|
That is true, but I have many users that want things as simple as possible and some that do not know how to bookmark a website. So being able to use Site items, or maybe even Experience Builder items, as a Start Page would be very helpful. I was thinking that a group could be used to curate which items should be in the Start Page dropdown list. That way admins can control what is available in the list and the list does not get long with unnecessary choices.
... View more
07-22-2020
07:59 AM
|
0
|
0
|
854
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tuesday | |
| 1 | a month ago | |
| 1 | a month ago | |
| 1 | 04-13-2026 09:30 AM | |
| 1 | 03-24-2026 01:01 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Tuesday
|