Latest Contributions by AmirBar-Maor

@SusanLMoore  Please submit an idea, it helps us prioritize the enhancements. Thanks!   ... View more

@SusanLMoore  We have received this idea from @MikeSnook.  We also consider enhancing the tool, as you suggest, to work on multiple layers. The tool honors the 'feature layer' - which means it honors the definition query. So the answer to your question is 'yes - it only runs on the current parcels if you set it to run on that layer'. This is unlike Geodatabase topology which runs on the feature classes in the geodatabase and has no notion of 'feature layers'. ... View more

@Greg_Mattis  This is the expected behavior. You can read more about it here: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/topologies/dirty-areas-in-versioned-feature-classes.htm Examples 4 & 5   @ColinZwicker please review my answer and add / correct. Why? 1. It is safer: the default version might have changed between the time you have reconciled to the time you posted your changes. 2. Multiple versions might have been validated and free of errors, but when their edits "meet" in the default versions they might violate the topology rules.     ... View more

Until we make a decision about creating new geoprocessing tools and methods, and assuming this is an interactive workflow, you can potentially use a task (set some steps to automatic behavior). ... View more

@MARIUSGLOVACI  To export to CAD you can use the 'Export toCAD' geoprocessing tool https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/conversion/export-to-cad.htm If you use it often you can add it to the ribbon (Project --> Options --> Customize the Ribbon). Why are you exporting CAD files? is this for external surveyors?   For importing CAD data there is already a button = the 'Add Data' button.   With Pro you can even select to add a subset of the CAD file (e.g. only lines).   Please clarify   ... View more

@CathyAppleton  Thanks for sharing your feedback about the Highlight Overlaps and Gaps tool. I believe an idea was submitted to create a GP tool that can export 'highlights'. The overlap/gap tolerance is very useful for organizations that consider a road as a valid gap or have condo units as a valid overlap. It should be smaller than the road's width. Please try to forget ArcMap for a second and try to define what an ideal usable solution would look like. If you had a solution that created thousands of errors, how would you do with that information? When would you like to fix those errors?   Any information/requirement is greatly appreciated.   ... View more

@DrewDowling @Sothea_VOEUN  There is no issue in creating overlapping parcels (leases, easements, condominium units...) If I understand correctly, you are interested in creating historic parcels for 'straight transfers' (the parcel geometry does not change, only a few attributes). This is a record-driven workflow. For the interim period, a task can help automate the process (the 5 steps above). In the long term, we can consider enhancing the duplicate tool to do what you are asking for. Please submit an idea on the idea board. Once parcel lineage depiction using link charts is released, another feature that might be asked is how to display straight transfers that are managed outside of the GIS. I have the feeling that organizations would not like to duplicate the parcel geometries in that case.   ... View more

@Sothea_VOEUN  Interesting use-case. Usually, organizations do not create historic parcels when there is a straight transfer of ownership. They only retire parcels when the geometry changes (regardless if this is 2D or 3D). However, if you want to track all the condominium transactions, you will have to duplicate it and then retire one of the units. the workflow would look something like this: Create an Active record Select the unit Use 'Duplicate parcels' with the option to update the field as 'none' Select one of the units Set historic   With 3.2 you will be able to depict the parcel lineage using Link Charts. ... View more

@StefanAngerer  I don't consider myself as an Arcade expert... to the best of my knowledge that is not possible to check the state of the feature on 2 different versions using Arcade. I'll be happy to be corrected by the gurus. Potential workaround: If you had a field and an attribute on the features in the Default version, e.g. a 'status' field and a value 'approved', you could constrain deleting such features using the attributes they hold. You can also think of a calculation rule that sets a field value if the feature made it to default. ... View more

@StefanAngerer  This expression will constrain edits in the default version: // Constrain editing the 'sde.DEFAULT' version return !(GdbVersion($feature)=='sde.DEFAULT');   You can also enhance it by only limiting certain portal groups from editing the 'Default' version. This is how you can find the groups the user belongs to: // find which groups a portal user belongs to. Returns an array. var myPortal = Portal("https://galileo.esri.com/portal/"); var currentUser = getuser(myPortal); return currentUser.groups ... View more

@AliciaTompkins  Aligning parcels, even 284 of them, should not take 2 days! Please contact technical support and provide your data so we can look into it Amir ... View more

Here is an update: we think we have a fix for this issue that we are currently testing against ArcGIS Enterprise 11.2.  @DrewDowling We could not have fixed it without you opening a technical support ticket and providing the data. So thank you!   ... View more

@RobertChaney  While this is not specific to the parcel fabric, and assuming you are trying to populate your own field (not a parcel fabric system field) - this seems like a bug to me, but we'll need to examine it more closely. I'll follow up with you directly to obtain your data and have a closer look. ... View more

@AndrewWallick  Please submit a technical support case with the data to reproduce the issue so we can have a closer look. Apart from seeing very long links (more than a 100') it's had to understand the issue just by looking at it. It is also important to know which version of ArcGIS Pro you are using as we keep improving the Align Parcels tool. ... View more

@RobertChaney  It's hard to comment on your Attribute Rule with regard to the relationship direction. However, when we perform certain operations we do account for the 'StatedArea' and either combine the areas (merge) or proportionally divide them (split). The calculated areas field is different, it uses the COGO values, if available, to calculate the area. The Build command  (Active / Extent) will update that field. How are you splitting the parcel and which commands are you using? ... View more