POST
|
Fraser, When connected directly to your enterprise geodatabase, and viewing the attribute rule(s) in question can you please check the exclude_from_client_evaluation property (i think its listed in the details pane near the bottom in an expansion >> ). If this is not set, try setting it. From reading your description (the odd GUID in the rule, the differing behavior) this looks like a case where the smart client (Pro) cant find one of the tables in your rule (because its not in the service) and therefore cannot evaluate the script before sending the edits to the server. Having the rule only execute on the server, where the enterprise data store does know about your other table) should allow the execution to be success.
... View more
10-29-2019
05:30 PM
|
3
|
1
|
60
|
POST
|
I have been told that making a list unique is relatively painless in python ids = [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 5 , 6 , 1 , 2 , 3 ] >>> sorted ( set (ids)) [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]
... View more
11-29-2018
03:36 PM
|
1
|
2
|
13
|
POST
|
Fengchao, Instead of building a large OR list for your linkID's where += ' OR "LINK_ID" = {0}' . format ( int ( linkid ) ) Can you try making the whereclause in the form of an in list?, e.g., IN (ID1, ID2, ID3, N)? Ideally this IN clause would contain no duplicated ID's (so perhaps collect them in a list and then only add the unique values). re: " I have tried to increase the size of virtual memory to 100GB. But unfortunately, I still get the same crash error. So it seems that because of the script itself. " As the thread has somewhat devised this issue isnt about heap memory but about stack memory and the usage of that stack while attempting to parse a whereclause with a growing number of logical operators. Thanks, Colin
... View more
11-29-2018
03:18 PM
|
1
|
3
|
13
|
POST
|
Good timing With the release of 2.2 check out: ProConcepts Geodatabase · Esri/arcgis-pro-sdk Wiki · GitHub Edit: totally missed your unique value statement, let me check with the team. Thanks, Colin
... View more
07-13-2018
09:49 AM
|
0
|
2
|
21
|
POST
|
Brian, ArcGIS Pro Core.Data has not exposed this functionality yet. We will look to do so in a future release. Do you utilize the simple stats (count, min\max etc) or standard deviation? Thanks, Colin
... View more
11-27-2017
02:11 PM
|
0
|
6
|
21
|
POST
|
Fabian, We added a GetDatabaseConnectionProperties function in the DatabaseClient class for the ArcGIS Pro 2.1 release. DatabaseConnectionFile connectionFile = new DatabaseConnectionFile ( new Uri ( @"C:\my.sde" )); DatabaseConnectionProperties expectedConnectionProperties = DatabaseClient .GetDatabaseConnectionProperties( connectionFile ); This will allow you to modify (assign a user password etc) the connection properties before using them to open a new Geodatabase. By having it available on the DatabaseClient it can be used for connections files that point to Geodatabases or DBMS's without the Geodatabase metadata. Happy connecting! Colin
... View more
11-15-2017
09:58 AM
|
0
|
0
|
15
|
POST
|
Fabian, This is a current limitation of the api, and will be addressed in the next release. The result will be a pattern to generate a DatabaseConnectionProperties directly from a DatabaseConnecitonFile without requiring that the Geodatabase is opened. Thank you for your question! Colin
... View more
11-09-2017
12:16 PM
|
0
|
0
|
15
|
POST
|
Tyler, I have logged your request with the team, who hope to provide this in an up coming release of ArcGIS Pro. Thanks, Colin
... View more
09-25-2017
01:58 PM
|
0
|
0
|
12
|
POST
|
Tyler, Would you be able to expand on your use case for requiring the ObjectClassID ? Thanks, Colin
... View more
09-11-2017
11:49 AM
|
0
|
2
|
12
|
POST
|
Max max, Grouping client side, of via a table sort pattern is not currently in our backlog for a future release. However that is not to say it couldn't be added and prioritized accordingly. Would you be able to email me your thoughts on a pattern? Thanks, Colin
... View more
08-29-2017
09:12 AM
|
0
|
1
|
13
|
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
2 weeks ago
|