POST
|
@anna_garrett I know you are busy, but if you select and copy out that area using the geoprocessing tool Copy Parcels and summit it to technical support we can have a look to figure out why it is not building. Will we continue to improve the default symbology and label classes? Yes. and every time we do improve them it will be up to you to decide if it is worth the effort to adopt it. We will try to also show how to do that in the next meetup. Build will only build from a seed if there is: A closed loop of lines All lines belong to the same record There is exactly one seed in the closed loop The entire seed is in the map extent (if using Build Extent)
... View more
03-25-2022
08:20 AM
|
1
|
1
|
1508
|
POST
|
Make sure you only have one parcel seed. The easiest thing to do is to select the Seed and see how many features are selected (bottom right of the map). This can happen if you selected 2 parcels by mistake - for example, the lot and the tax parcel. In 3.0 we have enhanced the seed label class to show a label if there is no parcel name which makes it easy to detect.
... View more
03-24-2022
08:18 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1540
|
POST
|
All - I have updated my reply above - it is NOT the solution. Using chord length and the proposed method will only work if the chord lengths are equal. Back to the drawing board... @NickN - maybe you want to submit an idea for the Divide tool to support the entry of chord lengths to split a true curve.
... View more
03-24-2022
02:20 AM
|
2
|
1
|
556
|
IDEA
|
@jcarlson We have worked with the Arcade team on the new ConvertDirection function. We have modified the default label class to use it in ArcGIS Pro 3.0.
... View more
03-24-2022
12:56 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1133
|
POST
|
@GISTech Yes - you should upgrade your parcel fabric to version 5 which matches the release of ArcGIS Pro you are using (2.9). I am also seeing constraint points move... they should not. We are looking into it.
... View more
03-23-2022
03:10 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1668
|
POST
|
@GISTech With ArcGIS Pro 2.9 and Parcel Fabric version 5, you can hold any point as fixed by setting the IsFixed field to 'Yes'. The new LSA engine allows for 'floating control points' - in which case the XY coordinates and the a-priory point accuracy (XyAccuracy field) are used in the adjustment as observation, but the point can still move. It is up to you to decide which points you want to hold fixed for the adjustment by setting the AdjustmentConstraint field to XYZConstraint. The type of adjustment also matters: it will be constrained when you perform a 'Weighted Constrained adjustment' - that requires at least 2 points to be constrained. But if you run a 'Consistency Check' which is a 'Free Network Adjustment'- all the points are allowed to move and the purpose of this adjustment is to evaluate a new survey coming in and detect blunders before integrating it with the rest of the survey network. Which version of ArcGIS Pro and Parcel Fabric are you using?
... View more
03-22-2022
12:45 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1697
|
POST
|
ALL - I have updated this reply. After further review by @TimHodson - this use of the the 'Distance' method and the 'Varying Distances' option + distribute proportionally will only work of all the chord length are equal. The reason for that is that the relationship between ArcLength and Chord length is NOT linear. So using the previously proposed method will not work - back to the drawing board. Previous reply: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Use the Divide tool using the 'Distance' method and the 'Varying Distances' option. Then use Chord distances but check the 'Distribute remaining length proportionally. It will split the geometry correctly but populate the chord distances as ArcLength distance. So you might want to run Update COGO after that. It might not work for everybody because Update COGO will set the COGO type to 'From Geometry' and might not get to the correct values if you don't have the Ground to Grid correction set properly.
... View more
03-17-2022
09:48 AM
|
3
|
2
|
674
|
IDEA
|
I have created this post to show different methods of seeing the records records' name. https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-videos/see-the-record-name-as-part-of-the-parcel/m-p/1151661#M77 I hope you like it. Amir
... View more
03-08-2022
04:05 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1372
|
POST
|
Are you tired of seeing the records' GUID value and want to see the actual record' name? This video shows different methods of displaying the Records' name instead. And here is the Arcade expression used. Just make sure to replace 'RecordHasTax' relationship class name with your relationship class name. If you are using enterprise geodatabase (AKA 'SDE') make sure to use the fully qualified name (as @GordonSumerling rightfully points down below): // Arcade expression to return the associated record name
var RecordName = First(FeatureSetByRelationshipName($feature, 'RecordHasTax', ['Name'], false));
if (!IsEmpty(RecordName)){return RecordName.name;}
return "Missing a record";
... View more
03-08-2022
04:03 AM
|
5
|
3
|
1353
|
POST
|
@LadyFranciscarKassama Assuming that your lines are "COGO Enabled" I think you might have a selection issue and that you have selected a polygon or a point as well - see image below. If you can - try to use the selection tool that is available in the Update COGO pane. That selection tool will only select lines.
... View more
03-08-2022
12:53 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1769
|
POST
|
@chadhickman Can you please describe the reason (use-case) behind this selection exercise? Thanks, Amir
... View more
02-28-2022
07:36 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1313
|
POST
|
Hi Chad, There is a very simple way - use Select By Location. I have used the parcel polygons layer because it is smaller and the "Boundary Touches" method. It took 6 seconds on a layer with 43K parcels It selected the correct points: Is this easy enough?
... View more
02-27-2022
11:41 AM
|
2
|
0
|
1325
|
POST
|
If the above doesn't work please contact technical support so they can have a closer look.
... View more
02-25-2022
12:44 AM
|
2
|
0
|
1076
|
POST
|
Hello Bob, It has been a while and it is great that the State of Montana is moving to Pro. The new parcel fabric "data controller" uses simple feature classes, so you can calculate the Z geometry on your points. Performing the calculation in a file Geodatabase is recommended to avoid the overhead of versioning. You can also consider using the Update Feature Z geoprocessing tool. Either way, I am sure viewing Montana's points in 3D will very appealing. Regards, Amir
... View more
02-07-2022
11:57 PM
|
0
|
1
|
675
|
IDEA
|
@jcarlson With 2.9 we can deliver layers that users OPT IN to...but since this 'prompt' is not intrusive I don't think it should cause any issue.
... View more
02-02-2022
06:39 AM
|
0
|
0
|
561
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
3 | 2 weeks ago | |
1 | a month ago | |
1 | 12-08-2023 07:42 AM | |
1 | 08-23-2024 08:44 AM | |
1 | 08-23-2024 09:29 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
Monday
|