Latest Contributions by MichaelBranscomb

Hi, There are no known issues with using the new BasemapStyles and OAuth2. Can you share a repro? Thanks ... View more

Hi, Here are some samples you may find useful: https://developers.arcgis.com/net/wpf/sample-code/sketch-on-map/ https://developers.arcgis.com/net/wpf/sample-code/display-annotation/ https://developers.arcgis.com/net/wpf/sample-code/edit-features-with-feature-linked-annotation/  https://developers.arcgis.com/net/wpf/sample-code/show-labels-on-layers/ ... View more

Thanks for confirming. `Main` branch is the default, but the original `master` branch was still accessible while we updated some CI internal processes. We have now removed the latter branch. Apologies for the mix-up. ... View more

Regarding building the samples - one of the team was just able to confirm that performing a Clean and Rebuild should resolve this issue.  ... View more

Hi, The main branch is updated for 100.10 - you should be able to pull and build that - if you can't we need to fix that. Also the viewer in the Store has been updated to 100.10 (you might at least be able to use this for easily testing performance).  Apologies you didn't see much follow-up on the original performance-related thread - it did spark an extensive internal discussion and investigation right down into our DirectX rendering code. There wasn't any obvious candidate improvement we could make there, but in our upcoming 100.11 release we do plan to include an enhancement to our underlying use of DirectX and it is certainly worthwhile you re-testing with that version. We also still have an active research project underway involving profiling the performance of rendering calls. Thanks ... View more

We resolved an issue in 100.8 related to model symbol anchors, are you able to update to 100.8 or later and confirm if this issue is still reproducible?  Also, the performance issue you mentioned that is not yet resolved - have you tested the current release 100.10?   Thanks ... View more

Hi Gonzalo and Esther, After further investigation this issue is due to the interaction of duplicate removal and line connection handling. We will investigate to determine what can be done to improve the line connection behavior for a future release, but in the interim the following option may provide you with a workaround:  labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"lineConnection\": \"none\" ,"); The default approach for connectable features is to connect them using the option MinimizeLabels, where line geometries with the same label and coincident end vertices should be considered together as a single, continuous geometry when placing labels. When setting the lineConnection property to a value of None, this will keep one label per line feature geometry. Thanks ... View more

Please can you try updating to the current release 100.10 and check if this is still reproducible? ... View more

Hi, That's fine: a value of `none` will ensure that no duplicates should be removed. It will leave all the placed labels on the map regardless of nearby duplicates. Thanks ... View more

Hi Esther and Gonzalo,  Thanks for the repro. The additional values required are:   labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"allowOverlapOfFeatureBoundary\": \"allow\" ,"); labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"allowOverlapOfFeatureInterior\": \"allow\" ,");   Note I also removed the `multiPart` since this only relates to Polygons:   labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"multiPart\": \"labelLargest\",");   To give this set of options:   StringBuilder labelBuilder = new StringBuilder(); labelBuilder.AppendLine("{"); labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"allowOverrun\": true ,"); labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"deconflictionStrategy\": \"dynamic\" ,"); labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"removeDuplicates\": \"none\" ,"); labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"labelExpressionInfo\": {"); labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"expression\": \"return $feature.Name;\"},"); labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"labelPlacement\": \"esriServerLinePlacementCenterAlong\","); labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"allowOverlapOfFeatureBoundary\": \"allow\" ,"); labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"allowOverlapOfFeatureInterior\": \"allow\" ,"); labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"symbol\": {"); labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"color\": [255,255,255,255],"); labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"haloColor\": [51,51,51,255],"); labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"haloSize\": 2,"); labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"font\": {\"size\": 13, \"weight\": \"bold\"},"); labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"type\": \"esriTS\"}"); labelBuilder.AppendLine("}"); return labelBuilder;   Which results in: While testing, because the label text values were identical I appended a value to differentiate and separate from duplicate removal behavior. Hopefully this solves your scenario? Regarding the doc on the JSON properties, this has been temporarily removed pending a full developer API for labeling in an upcoming release of ArcGIS Runtime.  Again, thanks for the simplified repro (and thanks to my colleague Peter for advice on labeling options). ... View more

Have you got a small, standalone repro?  That will make it easier to investigate further.   ... View more

Hi, Apologies - copy/paste error - I meant "deconflictionStrategy":"none". Using deconfliction strategy static or dynamic you may see some labels not placed due to conflicts with features / labels of higher priority. But a value of none will ensure all labels in that label class are placed regardless of overlaps.  Thanks ... View more

@Benjamin1 Joe shared the appropriate links above. To summarize: Currently only ArcGIS Developers Accounts have the ability to add and manage Content and Items with API keys.  To access organizations items you should continue to use an ArcGIS Identity, either a named user or application credentials: https://developers.arcgis.com/documentation/security-and-authentication/other-authentication-methods/application-credentials/ Thanks ... View more

Hi, This is an item on our long term backlog but is not currently planned for a specific release. Your details have been added to that item to helped with prioritization during future release planning. You might want to post this request on ArcGIS Runtime Ideas where we can monitor interest in this enhancement. In terms of alternatives, it might be possible to implement using a feature layer with text symbols / labels or perhaps with some investigation it's possible to share a custom grid as a mobile style from ArcGIS Pro and use that in conjunction with features / graphics in ArcGIS Runtime.  Thanks ... View more

Hi, If you always want to place the label regardless of whether it will overlap other features or labels you can force placement by using "deconflictionStrategy":"dynamic". You may also want to try increasing the priority value to 0 e.g. labelBuilder.AppendLine("\"priority\": 0 ,"); In a future release on the near term roadmap we plan to include a full API for setting labeling properties which will avoid the need to specify via JSON. ... View more