|
POST
|
Thanks Jim! I will check with the client if we can do this, and keep you posted.
... View more
02-27-2019
01:47 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1713
|
|
POST
|
Hello Survey123 friends, Our fieldcrew are hapy with Survey123, and have proudly reached a little over 1,100 points this week. Problem is, the survey123 website for that survey is not responding well anymore: - the "analysis" page takes really long to refresh (but eventually loads - filtering attirbute visibility really helps out). - the "data" page does not load at all. Users cannot interact with the data from there at all. Functionalities specific to survey123.arcgis.com (namely, reports!) are not available anymore. For comparison's sake, we do have other surveys with much fewer points, and they perform as usual - no problem there. The issue really seems to be with the amount of feature, surprisingly. Has anyone else experienced this? Is there any solution/hope in the pipe? Many thanks! With kind regards, Hélène.
... View more
02-20-2019
08:43 AM
|
0
|
4
|
1819
|
|
IDEA
|
Thanks for raising this is idea! I have a similar need, described here: Summary Table, rather than graphics ? Example tables are as follows: 1 - simple table, counting occurences of unique values for a single attribute: 2- advanced table, with a cross-count of features. This includes transposing unique values of a second attribute, to give a finer detail count of occurences. Many thanks!! Hélène.
... View more
02-08-2019
12:25 AM
|
2
|
0
|
5850
|
|
POST
|
Hello Survey123 friends! I was wondering if a product roadmap is available for consultation. My office would be happy with a broad idea of what's coming up, as we will be using Survey123 more an more. Many thanks ! With kind regards, Hélène.
... View more
01-30-2019
07:24 AM
|
1
|
2
|
1837
|
|
POST
|
FYI: I just saw this post:https://community.esri.com/groups/survey123/blog/2018/11/01/understanding-dynamic-labels-in-survey123-for-arcgis , which states that "choice-name" is implemented since version 3.1. Can't wait to try it out! Hélène.
... View more
01-11-2019
07:20 AM
|
2
|
0
|
8789
|
|
IDEA
|
Hi Jürgen, thanks for your comment! Could you please use the voting button at the top of the page (under the title)? this is what will raise the question's score and promote the idea's implementation up. Thanks!!!
... View more
08-23-2018
02:09 AM
|
0
|
0
|
4398
|
|
IDEA
|
Thanks Ismael, the tool looks great in the demo! Yes, it is what we are looking for. I would most likely create a dependant text field to give non-geographers the name of the broad bearing (N,S,E,W, N/E, S/W, etc.) in exported data, as they would not be able to interpret numeric bearings. In any case, the feature shown in the demo looks great, and is what we need in the field app form. Being able to fill the value by typing, pointing or with the device's compass makes it even better, more flexible than what I had thought of initially. Thanks a bunch!! Looking forward to it !
... View more
08-16-2018
12:34 AM
|
0
|
0
|
4398
|
|
POST
|
Hi Phil & Torsten, My organisation has the same issue. We tried to catch the URL called by S123 when login-in/retrieving the list of available surveys, but we were not successful. Would you have any hint/pointers for us? The idea would be to adjust proxy setting to let those URLs through (I think - I am no IT specialist, so this is my basic understanding of it!) Note that we successfully use Collector on the same enterprise network, because the URLs are exposed. Many thanks! Hélène.
... View more
07-20-2018
01:42 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2818
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for this link James, it looks very promising indeed! I will also send a support request on viewing field properties in ArcGIS Online. Many thanks again for your help! Hélène.
... View more
07-09-2018
02:55 AM
|
0
|
0
|
4750
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for the fast reply, James! I found the ArcGIS Online page on altering domains, but was not able to proceed: The data table displays correctly, but the "Field" button seems to reach a never-ending loop - the "loading..." graphic keeps showing, and yields no result, and does not display any field name or properties. I observed this on S123 feature services, and other, simpler feature services.
... View more
07-06-2018
02:05 AM
|
0
|
2
|
4750
|
|
IDEA
|
Hi James, Our fieldcrew is back from surveying, and asking to complete our "aspect" domain with a "everywhere/all around/in all directions" entry. I guess in this proposed widget, it could be another radio button on the center of the north arrow? or below it, maybe. Hoping this idea comes through... Many thanks!!
... View more
07-05-2018
07:54 AM
|
1
|
0
|
4398
|
|
POST
|
Our fieldcrew is extatic with Survey123, its ease of use in the field and back in the office. Their needs are growing day by day, and I am regularly requested to update existing survey designs. The designs so far are made with Suvrey123Connect (v.3.0.58). Most fields are "Select_one" or "Select_multiple" fields, with the domain documented in the "Choices" tab of the XLS file. I recently modified two domains: -Domain A: added 103 lines (pair of code and alias value) -Domain B: corrected an erroneous code value, that duplicated another one. I successfully saved the spreadsheet and re-published the form. No warnings, no problem - odd, as chainging domains is supposedly a structure change that should/would/might require the webservice to be deleted and recreated from scratch. When filling the form with S123 field app, the new values are present in form. -I can select from the new values in the two fields using each domain, and post my field survey. When I export the data to a file geodatabase, both domains are incomplete: Domain A is lacking the 103 new values, and Domain B does not contain the corrected coded value (the pair code/alias is missing, supposedly because the erroneous entry meant 2 identical codes were submitted to the database, and only the first one was accepted). i.e. the correction made in the XLS form did not carry over in the webservice underlying datastructure Can I update and the domain contents of my survey without publishing the survey design to a new survey (this breaks all maps, apps, and dashboards built upon the existing webservice)? ...If yes, how? ...If no, why did I receive no warning when publishing the survey design, and why was my webservice not deleted/recreated by the publishing process? To be complete, the publication to a new URL is successful, with correct domain contents applied in the form and in the resulting geodatabase. Many thanks for you help and advice! With kind regards, Hélène.
... View more
07-05-2018
07:22 AM
|
0
|
8
|
5143
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for your reply, Robb! I am not managing it, tough. In the XLS used to design the survey, the field used to store attachments is called attached_item Inserting ${attached_item1 | size:250:0} in the template returns "undefined" in the report. I tried this line alone first , and then as : ${#attachments} ${attached_item1 | size:250:0} ${/attachments} in the latter case, I obtained as many "undefined" lines as I have attachments. The attachments where taken with the phone's camera, their have long suffixes, such as "attached_item-20180622-072455.jpg". Not sure what I am doing wrong - What do you think I shoudl try? Many thanks again!! & a good week-end! Hélène.
... View more
06-22-2018
09:29 AM
|
0
|
3
|
13581
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 05-09-2022 01:05 AM | |
| 1 | 02-21-2023 05:18 AM | |
| 3 | 02-21-2023 08:09 AM | |
| 1 | 01-24-2022 08:20 AM | |
| 3 | 09-01-2022 03:32 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
03-01-2024
12:53 PM
|