|
POST
|
So one possible workflow to consider: 1. If the data is in multiple feature classes, you the Merge (Data Management) GP tool to merge them into a new, single feature line feature class. 2. Using the new, single line feature class, use the Snap (Editing) GP tool to pull near coincident enpoints and vertices together using a small tolerance. If you have the Production Mapping extension, you can go a little further... 3. Create a corridor for all passes by using the Buffer tool by a short distance that matches the trail width under tree canopy. 4. Dissolve the buffer polygons so you get one continuous corridor polygon. Then use the Polygon to Centerline (Topographic Production) GP tool to get a new centerline.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
2
|
0
|
155
|
|
POST
|
In reviewing Esri Support cases, there was a recent case using ArcGIS Pro 3.7 where there was an incompatibiilty issue with an Xtools Pro Add-in. Do you have XTools installed by chance? If so, disable it and try again. Maybe related (maybe not): ArcGIS Pro 3.7 Moves to .NET 10 001270: Consolidating the data failed.—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
1
|
378
|
|
POST
|
As you may know, Enable COGO (Data Management Tools) | ArcGIS Pro documentation adds 5 new attribute fields to your line feature class. As a result, the new fields will be part of the branch's attribute table and visible and editable by all users. You may want to test in a non-production branch before enabling COGO on production data to see if there are any negative items. From what I've read, enabling COGO on a line feature class in a branch version is fine and is a common practice for survey data/land information data.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
1
|
163
|
|
POST
|
HI @MariaDube - I see you submitted a Esri Support Services request recently on this item. In reviewing the case, the analyst was not able to reproduce the issue you're experiencing. It may (or may not) be related but I would try a Perform an ArcGIS pro Soft Reset as you recently updated to ArcGIS Pro 3.7. This "might" resolve the issue.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
147
|
|
POST
|
There's a couple ways to accomplish this: 1. In ArcMap, create a layer file (*.lyr) from the layer in the Data Frame that has your predefined category rules. Then in ArcGIS Pro, add that layer to a new map view and use the Apply Symbology From Layer (Data Management Tools) | ArcGIS Pro documentation to recreate the layer symbology in ArcGIS Pro. 2. Or in ArcGIS Pro, use the Unique Values option and set the attribute field for Field 1. Then click Add Field for Fields 2 and 3.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
3
|
295
|
|
POST
|
In ArcGIS Pro 3.7, there is a new Extract Scanned Lines (Conversion Tools) | ArcGIS Pro documentation geoprocessing tool that creates line features from a scanned and georeferenced image - jpg - in your case.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
240
|
|
POST
|
Not a programmatic solution but I found this on the Esri Support page: "PatchFinder “will list all products, hot fixes, and patches installed on your local machine.” Download: PatchFinder for Windows That’s the most reliable Esri-provided approach to confirm the patch is present without relying on the Programs & Features product version."
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
195
|
|
POST
|
For a DGN CAD feature layer in a 2D map, the usual reason “formatting symbols/sizes” doesn’t seem to work is that size is being driven by a size variable or you’re running into symbol display unit expectations. Try these checks: 1. Remove any attribute driven size Contents pane → right‑click the CAD layer → Symbology Go to Vary symbology by attribute → expand Size (or Marker size / Outline width) → set Field to <None> Point Feature Size Updates Are Not Reflected in ArcGIS Pro 2. Be consistent about symbol display units In 2D, point “size” is in the current symbol display units (for example points), which won’t necessarily match CAD/DGN design units 1:1. Vary symbology by size—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation 3. If symbology changes won't stick, recreate the layer Export/duplicate the data and re-symbolize (don’t re-import the same symbology if the layer is behaving inconsistently). Symbology of a Layer Does Not Match along ArcGIS Pro/ArcMap Interface
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
0
|
1
|
261
|
|
POST
|
Yes. You can create a output layer file (*.lyrx) from the GP tool - Save to Layer File (Data Management). It will store many layer properties including labeling. Save To Layer File (Data Management)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
2
|
0
|
579
|
|
POST
|
That checkbox is part of the Pyramid geoprocessing environment, which is a global raster-storage setting used by many geoprocessing tools that create/modify raster outputs. It lets you centrally control whether outputs should have pyramids built automatically (and with what levels/resampling/compression), so the same model/script can be run with pyramids on or off without editing each tool. In the specific Build Pyramids GP tool, the environment checkbox is essentially redundant—because that tool’s job is to build pyramids—but it still appears because environments are applied consistently across tools in the geoprocessing framework.
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
279
|
|
POST
|
Question: Prior to upgrading to 3.7, did you update to the required .NET framework version described here - ArcGIS Pro 3.7 Moves to .NET 10
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
0
|
931
|
|
POST
|
Another workflow to consider, create a new target attribute table in the target geodatabase with a GlobalID field and set the geoprocessing environment Preserve GlobalIDs. The target GlobalID must have a unique attribute index as referenced here 003340: The target dataset must have a GlobalID field with a unique index in order to use the Preserve GlobalIDs geoprocessing environment setting.—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation
... View more
05-15-2026
07:55 AM
|
0
|
1
|
284
|
|
POST
|
Yes, typically by converting the multipatch to a 2D footprint polygon, then converting that polygon to lines. Run the Multipatch Footprint (3D Analyst Tools) | ArcGIS Pro documentation first then run the Polygon To Line (Data Management Tools) | ArcGIS Pro documentation second.
... View more
05-14-2026
11:35 AM
|
0
|
1
|
512
|
|
POST
|
Certainly! I'm glad the explanation helped. I would encourage you to search for an existing ArcGIS Pro Idea on this community and if there is not, then add one so it gets visiblility to other customers. The more upvotes it gets, the more likely it will get visibility to the Pro developers. If you feel my answer was correct, you can mark it as "Accept as Solution" to close out this post.
... View more
05-14-2026
10:14 AM
|
0
|
0
|
491
|
|
POST
|
Hmmm...I did get the CONTAINS working on the text field. The key is creating the perhaps LONG list of combinations you mentioned but this is just picking on the initial creation.
... View more
05-14-2026
08:35 AM
|
0
|
0
|
693
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thursday | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Monday
|