Latest Contributions by Robert_LeClair

I would not install ArcGIS Pro 1.1/1.2 at all as the latest release of Pro 1.3.1 has more features, more capability, less prone to crashes and is a better release than earlier releases.  It would require you to completely uninstall 1.3.x, earlier release of the .NET Framework and install Python 3.4.  Not worth the headache.  My recommendation is uses ArcGIS Pro 1.3.x until the next release of Pro - 1.4 - end of this year. ... View more

Without diving deep in hardware specs/requirements, it's "possible" the RAM difference was causing the crash.  Sometimes antivirus programs do weird things too.  I guess since it works on a colleagues PC, then this thread is somewhat resolved.  Last question - besides the RAM difference, is the make/model of the PC similar or vastly different? ... View more

Pro will work with 4GB of RAM but is a "less than enjoyable user experience"  I'd run the "Can you Run It (Pro)" on both machines to see what the differences are:  http://cyri.systemrequirementslab.com/Client/Standard/?apikey=50F41142-39B0-4061-97C2-BA7B7FE43D0E&refid=1186&item=12433 ... View more

Hi Rohit - Understand.  Install ArcGIS Pro on another machine then (for testing purposes) and log into Pro with your Named User Account.  Does ArcGIS Pro crash on that machine?  Pls advise. Regards, Robert ... View more

An older thread on Pro 1.0 but another avenue to try - https://community.esri.com/thread/130078 And delete similar files from your user profile" C:\Users\<user profile>\AppData\Roaming\ESRI\ArcGISPro C:\Users\<user profile>\AppData\Roaming\ESRI\ArcGISPro1.0 C:\Users\<user profile>\AppData\Local\ESRI\ArcGISPro C:\Users\<user profile>\AppData\Local\ESRI\ArcGISPro.exe_Url_hkdcc5obbrc12pd4cpazeniq3020y2oq C:\Users\<user profile>\AppData\Local\ESRI\ArcGISPro.exe_Url_usrdyax2a4fbxzcclmgcafuxifk3o351 C:\Users\<user profile>\AppData\Local\ESRI\ArcGISPro1.0 Could be a corrupt user profile... ... View more

Some things to troubleshoot: If you've installed an earlier release of Pro before upgrading to Pro 1.3, it's best to do a complete uninstall of the original product. If you've installed an earlier release of ArcGIS Pro, I'd recommend uninstalling Python 3.4 as the components are now part of the 1.3 installation. Determine from your administrator if you're licensed to run Pro.  If not, they'll have to authorize your Named User account. Upgrade your .NET Framework to 4.6.1 or higher. Update your video card driver by determining the make/model of your card.  Then go directly to the manufacturer's website to download the driver.  Windows Update will not provide the latest driver for your video card. ... View more

One option is to create model with an iterator that runs the Domain to Table GP tool then have that followed with the Table to Domain tool to copy them into a new geodatabase.  There may be a more graceful way of doing this but this is the first workflow that came to mind. ... View more

The NED (National Elevation Dataset) may be what you're looking for - http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/basic/?basemap=b1&category=ned,nedsrc&title=3DEP%20View ... View more

There was a GeoNet thread about this:  https://community.esri.com/thread/56713  Not sure if it will help but a known issue. ... View more

I suspect this editing functionality is not part of Pro 1.3 but may be part of Pro 1.4.  The Pro Developers are working hard with the next release for "ArcMap equivalency" - meaning the same functionality (tool/extension/behavior wise) will be available in Pro 1.4.  From what I hear, Pro 1.4 will drop end of the year. ... View more

Not an ideal solution but would the Feature to Polygon GP tool work as long as all the lines intersected one another? ... View more

Yes, here's a link for a lot of older Esri software - http://appsforms.esri.com/products/download/ ArcGIS Diagrammer:  https://github.com/richiecarmichael/arcgis-diagrammer and here http://esripress.esri.com/bookResources/index.cfm?event=catalog.book&id=25 X-Ray for ArcMap:  http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f0ae73e90c1a4992a1059e7d370966d4#! Hope this helps! ... View more

It sounds like the publisher of the *.pmf file did not package a published map correctly.  He essentially sent you the *.pmf without the data encapsulated with the *.pmf.  You can read a bit more about it here:  http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.2/index.html#//000s00000006000000 ... View more