|
POST
|
@RichieFultz thanks for your feedback and sorry for the inconvenience. Do both issue happen in EXB chart? Could you share your ticket number?
... View more
03-03-2026
09:01 PM
|
0
|
0
|
750
|
|
POST
|
@JeffLegato1 do you do anything about the symbology in the gp service? or everything is default?
... View more
03-03-2026
08:51 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2963
|
|
POST
|
Good feedback. Thanks for letting us know. We will take a further look.
... View more
03-03-2026
08:49 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2963
|
|
POST
|
@DougBrowning we had a fix for running analysis on selections in Feb release of AGOL. Are you still seeing this problem?
... View more
03-03-2026
08:48 PM
|
0
|
1
|
943
|
|
POST
|
@Tristan_Read a good news is that we have a fixed updated tonight to the ArcGIS Online. Please try again and see if that solve your problem. Let us know if you have any question.
... View more
03-03-2026
08:46 PM
|
0
|
0
|
617
|
|
POST
|
Hi @AndrewSpencer if you are still seeing this issue, could you share the public app and we will take a look.
... View more
03-02-2026
09:24 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1976
|
|
POST
|
@Tristan_Read thanks for your feedback. Unfortunately we were not able to repro on our end yet. Could you please contact Esri Support to share us more details about your app and case? Appreciated.
... View more
03-02-2026
09:53 AM
|
0
|
1
|
687
|
|
POST
|
@tshafer it looks like the user do not have access to the map data. Would you check if the data sharing ever changed? This banner only shows when the app contains resource requires credential.
... View more
02-27-2026
06:09 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2023
|
|
POST
|
Hi @MackenzeOriger yes that is a known limitation. We will try to enhance.
... View more
01-15-2026
05:31 PM
|
0
|
0
|
424
|
|
POST
|
@JohnForne Currently yes a single chart widget only work with single layer. So if you change a different layer in the map, it won't act. You may try the workaround that Jose suggested above. But is using the same layer, the map extent change should trigger data action on the chart. You may share more details if that does seem to work for you.
... View more
01-15-2026
05:30 PM
|
0
|
1
|
652
|
|
POST
|
Hi @DougBrowning, thanks a lot for your feedback and sorry about the problems you are encountering. Here are my comments: 1. "We really need ExB to act like other Esri software but it does not - and this has come up again and again. We have seen over the years that Esri teams are each are in their own silo. " We are sorry that you have such feeling. ExB's Analysis widget is actually not developed solo by EXB team. It use arcgis analysis components, which provides reusable ArcGIS analysis web components to build web analysis tools so it caters to the different needs of our internal customers like Pipelines, Map Viewer analysis , ExB, GeoPlanner and external developers. So that means we do try to sync up the behaviors across different products by using same components. But it also means ExB has the limitation to solve all issues at our paces (WAB gp widget is developed independently however so the team itself have more control). But I do agree that we need more work to sync behaviors with desktop products like Pro. The analysis components are developed by a specific team which include exact team members working on Pro GP tools. So when you are seeing different behaviors, that is not because tools are developed by different team and logic. Desktop Pro tools and Online web service do have different standards and limitation. And the analysis components are still relatively new and they are growing. We would appreciate your feedback to help both ExB and analysis component improve. 2. For your described problem here "It is generalizing polygons for display then uses these as the input to tools.": Based on my understanding, you are seeing different intersection point result in Pro and ExB analysis. Unfortunately I cannot reproduce using my own tool. We do need more details to work on this. We would highly recommend you contact Esri support so stuff can help you narrow down the problem provide a workaround if possible, and importantly provide develop team detailed information and repro steps that help team to investigate and fix. We appreciate your feedback posting on GeoNet which bring us quicker attention but for solutions we think it is better and more efficient actually give us a support ticket with details. 3. I reviewed all your listed posts and made sure all got replied. Again we really appreciate your feedbacks. We will try our best to solve these issues, and I have logged issues for the problems that I can reproduce based on your description. But the difficulties still exist in some issue repro cases. The beset way is actually working with support team who can help customers narrow down problems and also provide develop team clear repro steps if confirmed. Thanks again, Wei
... View more
01-09-2026
06:06 PM
|
2
|
1
|
644
|
|
IDEA
|
Hi @DougBrowning we do have logged enhancement request about this internally. It actually relies of analysis component team and we have raised attention to them.
... View more
01-09-2026
05:36 PM
|
0
|
0
|
310
|
|
POST
|
Hi @DougBrowning are you still experiencing this issue? I tested on the latest environment with Analysis widget inside of a Accordion, but cannot reproduce
... View more
01-09-2026
05:34 PM
|
0
|
4
|
753
|
|
IDEA
|
Do you support the parameter groups (that can collapse/expand) that categorize the options?
... View more
01-09-2026
05:32 PM
|
0
|
0
|
418
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 08-03-2023 03:14 PM | |
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 05-08-2025 04:43 PM | |
| 1 | 11-17-2025 11:39 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
2 weeks ago
|