POST
|
I think the information you are looking for is on this page: https://support.esri.com/en-us/patches-updates/2023/portal-for-arcgis-enterprise-sites-security-patch I agree the description is not the clearest, but if I interpret this well, the main point seems to be the potential failure of a high availability "standby machine", as described in the quote visible below, which could of course be pretty problematic if your main server goes down due to a problem. Note that this issue only affects Windows installs according to the text: BUG-000160830 - Installing the 11.1 version of the Portal for ArcGIS Enterprise Sites Security Patch results in failures on the standby machine in highly available environments. (11.1 only) I think the other bug numbers mentioned in the quote below, are actually the exact same issue, just with a different bug number for each version of ArcGIS Enterprise: The defects that motivated the temporary disablement of the patches are BUG-000163367 (version 11.1), BUG-000160895 (version 10.9.1), and BUG-000161711 (version 10.8.1) and only impact Windows.
... View more
12-14-2023
09:55 AM
|
2
|
0
|
1786
|
POST
|
Well, there seem to be at least a couple of references to this particular error number and ArcGIS Enterprise / Server. Maybe there is something relevant to find in these links, e.g. did the format of the JSON change, or was there an upgrade to ArcGIS Enterprise using the security patch referenced in the last link, and you now need to patch it further to version 'B' of the patch to get it fixed?: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/paste-features-failed-error-code-10500/td-p/1257549 https://community.safe.com/s/question/0D54Q00009HHHyfSAH/arcsde-data-failing-to-insert-or-update-to-arcgis-enterprise-via-arcgis-portal-feature-service-writer https://support.esri.com/en-us/bug/cannot-create-or-move-existing-features-in-a-hosted-fea-bug-000151760
... View more
12-12-2023
01:22 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1584
|
POST
|
Also note that Esri made this setting default in Pro 3.1, so even if you do not want it, it is still activated. I actually think this is a bad descision on Esri's part, it is always better to let users "opt-in" on new functionality, instead of having to "opt-out". This also reduces the risk of user issues in case the new functionality turns out buggy, as in this case...
... View more
08-22-2023
12:23 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1310
|
POST
|
Hi @benken31 , As I wrote, I reported this ambiguos label setting issue as a potential bug to Esri, and they acknowledged it. Based on this, I now in the past week also got a status update of the issue, stating the fix is now in "Product plan", which means the fix will be either in Pro 3.2 or 3.3 according to Esri's issue status handling.
... View more
08-22-2023
12:18 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1310
|
POST
|
Isn't this the same issue?: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/web-appbuilder-does-not-honour-the-symbology-of/m-p/1221558/highlight/true#M48323 Seems you may need to update your workflow to newer tools to be able to use the 4.x JSAPI features.
... View more
06-20-2023
08:48 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3520
|
POST
|
After you posted your problem and question, I just couldn't resist doing an attempt to output a 1073x970 cm wall size map of the United States straight from ArcGIS Pro based on the 1:500k spec and the OpenStreetMap global database created with my ArcGIS Renderer for OpenStreetMap that I created. The screenshot of the resulting giant 1GB(!) size output PDF at its full extent included below, took about 12 -18 hours to export if I remember well, including hillshading. I already had the result on the 13th of May, but since you showed no further interest and it was likely you were making further attempts to concoct your own version, I did not show it before. The additional screenshots again show the actual 1:500k detail of the data, as viewed at 100% display scale in Adobe Reader, and as generalized and prepared by my Renderer from the original OpenStreetMap data. The giant PDF can only be opened on a recent 64bit version of Adobe Reader, and it takes about 10-15 minutes to open on my admittedly powerful but slightly dated HP Z840 hardware. After that, browsing it at 100% is sluggish, but definitely not so bad to be unusable. It was fun and exhilarating to see this gargantuan PDF open up with the tremendous amount of detail. Again, its best to download these images due to the poor preview option of the ESRI Community website, not allowing you to view them at their original 100% scale. I agree about your observations regarding the "Multiply" blend mode, it is the best of all available. I also recognize the issue you posted about vector layers of roads showing hillshade detail through. This issue does not occur in my Renderer, due to the layers for roads being rendered and stacked on top of the hillshade with the blend mode, with the landuse layers below the hillshade in the TOC, that will show the blend and hillshading effect (but this is of course the desired thing). Due to the layers being stacked on top, the shields and road rendering isn't affected by the blending and hillshading (although in this particular "Topo" style I actually don't render shield, but only road ref labels parallel to the roads, I do have another style with a simple form of shields).
... View more
06-09-2023
10:20 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3689
|
POST
|
Ah, I misunderstood. I thought it would be put up against a wall, but it is going to be walked on for a one time exercise. I may be wrong, but this sounds a bit like FEMA.gov type work? At least, I could see FEMA doing it. Anyway, the idea sounds kind of fun. If it is indeed for something related to disaster management, maybe I can help you out no cost, but I would sure like to see a bit more info, if not here, via a Private Message or mail. You also haven't specified how quickly you need this. Days, week, month?
... View more
05-16-2023
01:18 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3805
|
POST
|
Hi @davedoesgis , Well, some budget must at least be available, as you don't do a 36x24 feet wall print for free at a printing shop.... But I understand the "budget" and outsourcing problem. Although this Renderer is a wholly personal project, in the past, working for a mid-size GIS company here in the Netherlands, I have been dispatched on long term consultancy jobs at multiple Dutch government agencies, sometimes working for years internally, so I have some sense of how these things work. Clearly this is going to be a one-off project considering the output. Anyway, could you share some more details about this project and yourself? If you do not want to share this information on a public forum like this one, drop me a private message here on the "ESRI Community", or send me an e-mail via the mail address included on the SOTM poster. - What government agency are you working for? - What is the occasion for putting up this wall print: temporary or semi-permanent? - Where is it going to be displayed, what office? - Could you share a photo of the wall where it is going to be installed? - Do you have more technical details about your exact requirements for the file format, resolution and size of the needed data file? - Is the content of the print "The lower 48 states" already fixed, or would you potentially consider other options? Surely, the 1:500k hillshaded print of the US will be impressive, but the 1:25k scale of the Renderer's output, as visible in the SOTM poster, is really beautiful as well in print. That would of course require a more localized subject choice, e.g. part of a single state which preferably has good landuse and building coverage in OpenStreetMap. - What is the timeline for this project? When do you need to have this finished? - Is the map itself the final product, or are you going to use it as a backdrop to overlay other data on it before sending it of for print? If so, what is it going to display? - What cartographic projection did you have in mind? I sometimes simply choose a central UTM zone for large regions, as per the suggested UTM zone 14N, as I like the more-or-less equal area property of UTM, simply accepting more shape distortion to the sides, but the Renderer can in fact output to any projection ArcGIS supports, e.g. Equal Earth.
... View more
05-16-2023
12:36 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3816
|
POST
|
@davedoesgis wrote: Also open to other strategies, so fire away! thanks! Does that willingness to be "open to other strategies" also extent to seriously paying for a high quality / high resolution PDF or TIFF/PNG file fully prepared for you, or does that openness stop right there? You are asking a lot here, at 36x24 feet final print size, but fortunately, I have potentially a lot to offer to you. I am asking because I have been working on an un-released personal multi-year project to develop a sophisticated "ArcGIS Renderer for OpenStreetMap". This has been a gargantuan project and challenge to be honest, but I think the results are pretty astounding by now, and far surpass any of the existing well known map services like the ones from ESRI, Mapbox, Google or Bing in terms of cartography and detail (especially in the true topographic scales of >= 1:50k). I have presented a poster of this work at last year's "State Of The Map" OpenStreetMap conference in Florence, Italy. A screenshot of that poster is attached here in the post. If you want to see the poster at its true size and in full glory, you can download it from the SOTM 2022 poster gallery here: https://2022.stateofthemap.org/posters/ It is "Poster 22 ArcGIS Renderer for OpenStreeMap". Click on the (unfortunately garbled) poor quality preview to open the full PDF from the gallery and save it locally if you want. About your project: 36x24 feet gives me a nice 1:500k scale map in UTM zone 14N centered on the middle of the US (lower 48 states). That would give the detail you can view in the other two attached images. I actually developed two styles: one loosely based on the existing OpenStreetMap "Default" map style (but with significant enhancements), and a true topographic style similar to some of world's most well known National Mapping agencies. These styles do not match ESRI's "Topographic" style, they are my own custom ArcGIS Pro styles. Also, the actual style format is my own propriety design, not a Mapbox vector style derivative. It actually uses Pro layer files (*.lyrx) as part of the file format. It is a massive amount of data for the United States at the desired scale, but fortunately the Renderer does employ sophisticated generalization to handle this amount of data, without the typical crude "minimum area" filtering & Douglas Peucker generalization causing random ugly losses in e.g. forest polygons, as seen in many vector tile maps at small scales. As you can see from the poster, I actually currently run a 1.5 TB spatial database with the entire Planet's worth of OpenStreetMap data in true spatial vector format, so exporting the lower 48 states in the topographic style is no problem. You do have to realize though that the current map content of the US in OpenStreetMap, although significant, is not at the level of some of the European countries, and also doesn't perfectly match the content of ESRI's "Topographic" map that is likely enhanced with Natural Earth and USGS or other local government agencies data. The data related to especially the landuse, natural features like mountain ranges, and hydrography is kind of patchy and incomplete in the US in OpenStreetMap, which will influence the final map image. That said, the final result map will still be impressive at the scale and size you desire with the entire major road network of the US, cities and the hillshade blended in. If you want to review the attached images, I recommend you to download them. Unfortunately, the "Document Preview" option here on the ESRI forums seems to forcefully re-scale the images causing blurry low quality images, and doesn't allow you to set exact 100% viewing scale.
... View more
05-14-2023
02:25 AM
|
0
|
3
|
3854
|
POST
|
Hi Bern, Side note, but is ESRI actually planning to add color to faces and roofs of buildings? I have noticed that ESRI's interpretation of the OpenStreetMap Simple 3D Building tagging specification is actually quite good, as e.g. witnessed by the below rendering of the Berlin cathedral in ArcGIS Pro based on the ESRI Scene Layer service, that shows proper interpretation of things like roof shapes and directions. However, it appears any color tagging is ignored. I think it would be nice if this was added, see the second example of F4Maps with the correct coloring of the same building based on the OpenStreetMap color tags.
... View more
04-24-2023
10:16 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5116
|
POST
|
I have now tested this with a Pro 3.1 Map document with >50 label classes and with clearly defined label priorities, but reversing the order of the classes in the "Label Priority Ranking" dialog doesn't fix my labeling issues related to the "Remove ambiguous labels" with "Remove all" settings, so I don't think it is actually true that reversing the order of the label classes in the dialog fixes stuff. I think it likely you had an accidental combination of Maplex settings where this seemed to work, but that it is not a real general solution for what would constitute a potential Pro bug if it were true.
... View more
03-10-2023
12:22 PM
|
1
|
3
|
1481
|
POST
|
That's not weird behavior, it is a bug if that is true. If I may ask, was this Pro 3.1, that has a new Maplex setting "Remove ambiguous labels" that defaults to "Remove all"? I have had issues with this new default setting, and needed to switch to "Do not remove" or "Remove within same label class" to get proper behavior similar to Pro 3.0, and reported the issues with the "Remove all" default as a potential bug in Pro 3.1 to ESRI, which is still in investigation. I am now wondering if this issue is related, and the "Remove all" problems I had were actually caused by your observation: that the interpretation of the priority list may be inverted for that specific setting, and likely not with the other two, as I got proper result there.
... View more
03-10-2023
11:39 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1481
|
POST
|
That is essentially the same problem. Uninitialized variable. I have again updated the code, see the code sample in the previous post, it will now set the 'jurisleft' and 'jurisright' variables to empty string "" if no jurisdiction is found. You may consider replacing that with null. Change the variable initialization to: var jurisleft = null
var jurisright = null Who actually developed this code? Is it part of an ESRI solution, or was this developed in-house? These errors are really basic ones, that shouldn't be in released and properly tested code.
... View more
02-26-2023
12:56 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1095
|
POST
|
I have updated the code. I noticed the "isLeftValue" and "isRightValue" are only initialized inside an 'if', that may not be entered by the code based on the 'if' condition. Putting the variable initialization outside the 'if' should work. // This rule will calculate the left and right municipality for a road.
// It determines if the road is completely within a intersectingArea or falls on the edge of a intersectingArea and updates the appropriate values on the road
// Define the Road Centerline fields
var jurisleft_field = "L_JURISDIC";
var jurisright_field = "R_JURISDIC";
// Define the Geopolitical Areas fields
var jurisname_field = "JURISD";
// Get the intersecting Geopolictical Areas
var intersectingAreas = Intersects(FeatureSetByName($datastore, "PublicSafetyGIS_Data.PUBLICSAFETYGIS.Test_Jurisdictions", [jurisname_field], true), $feature)
// This function will convert a polygon geometry to a polyline
function polygonToPolyline(p) {
var json = Dictionary(Text(p));
var polylineJSON = {
"paths": json["rings"],
"spatialReference": json["spatialReference"]
};
return Polyline(polylineJSON)
}
// Test if the road falls completely within a area and does not overlap any of the area's outline
// If it does update the left and right value to be equal to the area's value
var isWithin = false;
var partialOverlap = [];
for (var intersectingArea in intersectingAreas) {
if (Within($feature, intersectingArea)) {
var line = polygonToPolyline(Geometry(intersectingArea));
if (!Overlaps($feature, line)) {
var jurisleft = intersectingArea[jurisname_field];
var jurisright = intersectingArea[jurisname_field];
isWithin = true;
break;
}
// Store any boundaries the line is partially within (overlaps some of the polygons intersectingArea)
else {
Push(partialOverlap, intersectingArea);
}
}
}
// If the road does not fall within a area, attempt to find any areas that it overlaps the outline
// Then test if the polygon is on the right or left side of the line and update the right or left value
var isRightValue = false;
var isLeftValue = false;
if (!isWithin) {
for (var intersectingArea in intersectingAreas) {
var line = polygonToPolyline(Geometry(intersectingArea));
if (Within($feature, line)) {
// Offset the geometry to the right and test if it intersects the intersectingArea
var offset_geometry = Offset($feature, 5);
if (Intersects(offset_geometry, intersectingArea)) {
var jurisright = intersectingArea[jurisname_field];
isRightValue = true;
}
// Offset the geometry to the left and test if it intersects the intersectingArea
offset_geometry = Offset($feature, -5);
if (Intersects(offset_geometry, intersectingArea)) {
var jurisleft = intersectingArea[jurisname_field];
isLeftValue = true;
}
}
}
}
// If either the left or right value is not set we will loop through the partially within
var jurisleft = ""
var jurisright = ""
if (isLeftValue || isRightValue) {
for (var i in partialOverlap) {
var intersectingArea = partialOverlap[i];
var line = polygonToPolyline(Geometry(intersectingArea));
// Get the portion of the road that overlaps the polygon intersectingArea
var intersection_geometry = Intersection($feature, line);
// Offset this portion of the road to the right and test if it intersects the intersectingArea
var offset_geometry = Offset(intersection_geometry, 5);
if (Intersects(offset_geometry, intersectingArea) && !isRightValue) {
jurisright = intersectingArea[jurisname_field];
}
// Offset this portion of the road to the left and test if it intersects the intersectingArea
offset_geometry = Offset(intersection_geometry, -5);
if (Intersects(offset_geometry, intersectingArea) && !isLeftValue) {
jurisleft = intersectingArea[jurisname_field];
}
}
}
return {
"result": {
"attributes":
Dictionary(
jurisleft_field, jurisleft,
jurisright_field, jurisright
)
}
}
... View more
02-25-2023
01:59 PM
|
2
|
3
|
1119
|
POST
|
Before the upgrade to Pro 3.1, were you using the default 'arcgispro-py3' Python environment, or a customized clone created with the ArcGIS Pro "Package Manager"? If the latter, I guess you may need to update the cloned Python environment for the latest version. Pro will even automatically switch to the default 'arcgispro-py3' environment, if the clone is not up-to-date, and display a warning, so you may be missing vital packages now that you installed in the clone. The "Environment Manager" that is part of the "Package Manager" will show this with a special icon next to the environment that offers the option to upgrade the environment, which seemed to work well in my personal case. Only after upgrading, will you be able switch back to your customized cloned environment and activate it for use in your workflow and scripts.
... View more
02-24-2023
01:39 PM
|
0
|
1
|
4222
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 3 weeks ago | |
1 | 3 weeks ago | |
1 | 08-23-2017 07:51 AM | |
2 | 09-01-2024 02:19 PM | |
1 | 08-27-2024 10:56 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
Sunday
|