|
POST
|
I'm sorry, I completely forgot that I posted this. Deleting the actual hosted feature service itself will delete the data. But I don't want to delete an entire feature service just to delete the data, because then I'll just have to re-create it. Deleting records through the hosted feature service through ArcGIS Pro only deletes it from our view in Pro/Portal, but it doesn't actually delete any content because the space available never increases (this is after deleting thousands of records with thousands of picture attachments). I did ask this question at the UC and the solution was to disable and re-enable sync in the hosted feature service settings in Portal. While that did work.....it also wrecked the feature service (from a Survey123 form). That solution might work on basic feature services, but I have some more complicated ones with related tables/attachments. I'm not having an issue with backups as they are getting stored on our file share and not on the VM itself.
... View more
10-18-2018
12:17 PM
|
0
|
0
|
4833
|
|
POST
|
After moving a production database to a brand new VM and having web maps pull from it, I am now receiving this message again. While web map performance has significantly increased, we still receive this error message (although the frequency of this message has decreased). Regardless, this error message is severely hampering our ability to deploy web maps to users as this causes a large productivity drop because the web maps are practically unusable until I either restart the feature service, or the user waits about 15-20 minutes. With this happening multiple times per day to multiple people, the lost time adds up quickly. This message appears to be happening on layers that are edited a lot on the web map. Does anyone have any solutions to this?
... View more
10-18-2018
12:09 PM
|
0
|
4
|
3579
|
|
POST
|
In ArcGIS Pro 2.2.3, I am having an issue with allowing the assignment of unique numeric IDs for sharing web layers. In the past, when having that option selected in the data frame properties, I was able to add new layers to the map, re-publish it and everything would be maintained within my Portal web maps. All of a sudden, it appears that is no longer working. When re-publishing feature services with that option checked, it now re-assigns layer IDs to the new layer that I added and any layers below it. So if there are 10 layers, and I add a new layer 8th from the top, it will re-assign layer IDs from layers 8-11. I didn't have this issue in the past, but now I am. I noticed that the layer ID in ArcGIS Pro for all of my layers is -1. Would that have something to do with the issue I'm having? When I've done this in the past in ArcMap, it would assign a different number and not just -1.
... View more
10-18-2018
06:08 AM
|
0
|
1
|
5918
|
|
POST
|
I have gotten mixed answers on that one. It might depend on how many layers you have in your feature service. If you have a small number of layers, I would say leaving them in one feature service is fine. If you have a large number of layers, it's possible separating them out might be beneficial. You might need to do some testing to see where you get best performance. If you have any data that doesn't change often at all, I would recommend those layers being cached.
... View more
10-15-2018
11:04 AM
|
0
|
0
|
4448
|
|
POST
|
When overwriting, it does not create a new feature service. The item stays the same in Portal and the web maps that contains the feature services will still continue to work. However, a word of warning when overwriting feature services. In the data frame properties, I recommend checking the box next to: "Allow assignment of unique numeric IDs for sharing web layers." This comes in handy when you want to add new layers to the feature service in Pro, and then overwrite the feature service. If you do not have this checked, your item ID's can potentially change and it will mess up the web maps that contains the feature services, and you will have to remove and re-add the feature service within the web map. You can avoid this by checking the box. With that being said, if you have already published a feature service without that box checked, then check it and re-publish, your layer ID's might change and might affect the web map. This link has more documentation regarding sharing web layers: Introduction to sharing web layers—ArcGIS Pro | ArcGIS Desktop
... View more
10-15-2018
10:45 AM
|
0
|
2
|
4448
|
|
POST
|
In order to upload hosted content to Portal, you need the ArcGIS Data Store installed. Have you installed the ArcGIS Data Store?
... View more
10-03-2018
11:47 AM
|
0
|
0
|
997
|
|
POST
|
With Portal (and ArcGIS Data Store), there can only be a primary and standby machine. The primary Portal machine replicates to the standby Portal machine. When the primary machine fails, the standby machine is promoted to primary. Server on the other hand supports active/active. This link will explain configuring a highly available ArcGIS Enterprise deployment. Configure highly available ArcGIS Enterprise—Portal for ArcGIS (10.6) | ArcGIS Enterprise
... View more
09-27-2018
05:26 AM
|
1
|
0
|
7384
|
|
POST
|
I am creating a MMPK with numerous point, line, and polygon layers pulling from an EGDB for use in Explorer. Recently, one of the layers is having issues drawing in Explorer. If I open the MMPK in ArcGIS Pro, the layer is visible, but in Explorer, either the layer is not visible or when it is visible, I can't select select it and access pop-ups. This layer used to work fine, but now it no longer works. The only thing that has changed is that I added a relationship class to this layer to associate with three related tables. I'm not concerned with having access to the related tables in Explorer, I just need the point feature class to be visible and accessible. Even after removing the relationship, the layer still does not draw. Exporting the feature class with no relationships fixes the issue, but this is not a good long term solution. Is this a known issue or does anyone have any solutions to this?
... View more
09-17-2018
06:14 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1761
|
|
POST
|
If you are using Insights 2.3, then you shouldn't need to upgrade to 10.6 from 10.5.1 according to the compatibility table. However, do not upgrade to 10.6.1 as Insights does not support 10.6.1 yet (according to other forum threads). Insights 3.0 should support 10.6.1 (according to other forum threads). Compatibility with ArcGIS Enterprise—Insights reference | ArcGIS
... View more
09-04-2018
06:34 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2038
|
|
POST
|
I contacted ESRI support and I was told that is was because of lack of resources (RAM) on the server that contains the EGDB. We added more RAM, but it did not resolve the issue. I did not contact ESRI after adding additional RAM. The only way we were able to resolve it is move the EGDB to a different server. It's possible that we still don't have enough resources or it could be a configuration issue with the server. Regardless, moving the EGDB to a different server solved the issue.
... View more
09-04-2018
06:30 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3579
|
|
POST
|
I'm not 100% sure on this, but I do not think Collector supports vector tiles yet.
... View more
08-27-2018
04:46 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1167
|
|
POST
|
I've had an issue similar to this, except the URL would change to the machine name only under certain circumstances. The solution we found was to modify the web context URL as shown here. Configure your portal to use a reverse proxy server—Portal for ArcGIS (10.6) | ArcGIS Enterprise
... View more
07-18-2018
10:35 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3784
|
|
POST
|
Thank you! I assumed that was the case but I just wanted to make sure. Thanks!
... View more
07-18-2018
10:31 AM
|
1
|
0
|
2585
|
|
BLOG
|
For a non-hosted feature layer in ArcGIS Enterprise, I met all of the criteria mentioned in this post, but it still wouldn't let me publish the survey. The only way I was able to publish the survey was after enabling archiving in the feature dataset the feature class is stored in.
... View more
07-17-2018
01:25 PM
|
1
|
0
|
36707
|
|
POST
|
I am currently running ArcGIS Enterprise 10.6 and installed Operations Dashboard using the standalone installer. Since Operations Dashboard is included at the 10.6.1 release, do I need to uninstall the standalone installation of dashboard prior to upgrading to 10.6.1?
... View more
07-17-2018
06:00 AM
|
1
|
5
|
3246
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Friday | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 3 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 06-10-2026 11:28 AM | |
| 1 | 06-10-2026 11:08 AM |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
2 hours ago
|