|
POST
|
I created a simple MMPK in Pro 2.0 that has no zoom problems, but the more complex maps are still problematic. At least I verified that, for a simple map, definition queries are honored if the MMPK is generated by 2.0 rather than 1.4.1. For an example of a problem map, see this topic: 2.0: MMPK creation problems
... View more
07-03-2017
02:15 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1123
|
|
POST
|
LM was upgraded over the weekend, and Pro is happy now. Thanks again.
... View more
07-03-2017
10:19 AM
|
2
|
0
|
1850
|
|
POST
|
I have a project that exports a perfectly valid MMPK in 1.4.1, but when I open the project in 2.0 and recreate the MMPK, the result is a piece of crap (when reimported into Pro). I've attached it to see if anyone else can recreate the problem.
... View more
07-03-2017
08:13 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1369
|
|
POST
|
FYI, I just reimported the new MMPK into Pro 2.0, and it's crap. I don't think Runtime can be blamed for this problem.
... View more
07-03-2017
07:45 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1123
|
|
POST
|
The original MMPK was created in 1.4.1 -- I just recreated it in 2.0, and the results are even worse. Of all the features and layers in the map, I'm only seeing one feature each from two layers.
... View more
07-03-2017
07:40 AM
|
0
|
4
|
1123
|
|
POST
|
Well, I don't know which issue you think is fixed, but I'm still having to use the add baselayer workaround on my example MMPK in order to zoom out beyond a certain scale. However, I can at least pan to the end of the data now. Anyway, I'll keep looking into MMPK issues with 100.1, and report any problems directly to tech support.
... View more
06-30-2017
02:18 PM
|
0
|
6
|
7272
|
|
POST
|
Is there anything like XRay for ArcGIS Pro in the works?
... View more
06-28-2017
11:33 AM
|
0
|
7
|
10572
|
|
POST
|
I was able to add the fields using the Join Field GP tool. I also lost the ability to open my fields design view, so I'll have to work out my field orders in advance.
... View more
06-28-2017
08:27 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1066
|
|
POST
|
I am trying to configure a popup for a feature class, and want to include fields from relates where the feature class is the destination. For example, each Pipe feature in UPDM can be related to a single Pressure System record, and I'd like to display the system name in the popup. However, only relates where the feature class is the origin appear in the field list. Is there any way to display the fields I want? [I just upgraded to Pro 2.0 and still don't see what I want.]
... View more
06-28-2017
07:59 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1294
|
|
POST
|
I thought it was only needed for concurrent licenses on LM itself, not named users on Portal. I'll look into it, thanks..
... View more
06-27-2017
03:06 PM
|
0
|
3
|
1850
|
|
POST
|
I upgraded Pro to 2.0 and it won't log into Portal for licensing. It logs into ArcGIS Online for licensing just fine.
... View more
06-27-2017
02:57 PM
|
1
|
6
|
2576
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 01-04-2012 06:42 AM | |
| 1 | 09-23-2021 10:42 AM | |
| 2 | 09-28-2021 07:07 AM | |
| 1 | 04-07-2021 10:31 PM | |
| 3 | 03-21-2021 01:14 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
01-07-2022
08:31 AM
|