|
POST
|
So at least you've narrowed it down to North Carolina State Plane. I don't have any super specific advice to offer at this point expect that the final variability might be due to the various flavors of State Plane there are, based on the datums etc. I suggested NAD83 Feet because it should be the most common choice but, if you look through the various State Plane coordinate system choices, you'll see NAD83 (2011), NAD83 (CORS96), NAD83 (HARN) and so on and so on. Try these variants out, one by one, and see what happens. Hopefully one of them will be the glass slipper.
... View more
09-29-2023
09:06 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3040
|
|
IDEA
|
I guess this idea is close to what I'm looking for as well. I'd like to print out a report (PDF/physical print) based on query features and, ideally, I could use a Word Doc as the report's template similar to what you can do in Survey 123.
... View more
09-28-2023
08:12 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3260
|
|
POST
|
Some states have multiple state plane zones within their boundaries so you might have to further refine this but it looks like North Carolina only has one for the entire state. I'd try opening a blank data frame, adding a layer that you know should overlay with this suspect data (make sure *it* has a defined projection), and then changing the projection of the data frame to the North Carolina State Plane coordinate system: "NAD_1983_StatePlane_North_Carolina_FIPS_3200_Feet" Now add the layer you're trying to determine the projection for. Does it drop onto the other layer?
... View more
09-26-2023
11:59 AM
|
0
|
2
|
3099
|
|
POST
|
It would be helpful to know where you are, or where you expect your data to be located. In the US? or some other part of the world? If you're in the US, the two options that come to mind are either State Plane coordinates or UTM. Back the data up (or work on a copy) before you try applying projections so that you don't permanently mess it up.
... View more
09-26-2023
11:10 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3142
|
|
POST
|
Try renaming the normal.mxt file in your profile and seeing what happens. You'll find the file here: C:\Users\<your account>\AppData\Roaming\ESRI\Desktop<your Arcmap Verison>\ArcMap\Templates\Normal.mxt Rename the file to normal.old and the fire up Arcmap. It will create a new normal.mxt. Once the application is ready, try to open your MXD again. This will at least test if your Arcmap template file has gotten corrupted.
... View more
09-25-2023
04:01 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1283
|
|
IDEA
|
@JörgMoosmeier Well, as someone who work's on the Portal side of the equation, I know I have a long wait for a lot of the functionality I need (Q4 2024 for WAB->EB parity for example) so I'm stuck for now. I am able to edit the JSON of my map and, for now, I'll just have to use this AGOL ASSISTANT workaround. Here's the definition expression to use for an end date which is today, or in the future: "definitionExpression": "endDate >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP"
... View more
09-21-2023
10:32 AM
|
0
|
0
|
10212
|
|
IDEA
|
@JörgMoosmeier So you would agree that the filtering options are available when speaking about past events but not for events in the future? That seems to validate my Idea. I'm more concerned about filtering *future* events than I am the past (road closures, etc).
... View more
09-21-2023
08:45 AM
|
0
|
0
|
10221
|
|
IDEA
|
@JörgMoosmeier I'm using Enterprise 10.9.1 but, to my knowledge and experience, no, you cannot do what I have described either in Portal of AGOL. I just logged into AGOL and then added an earthquake layer to my map. For a filter, I tried to just filter that layer for records from today and it's still asking me for the specific date. There is no relative "today" option- you must select or specify an actual date. The Help document you linked to mentions options such as "is on" or "is after" but in all these cases, you have to supply a hard date value (9/21/2023). I want a relative value ("today") so that the map is smart enough to adjust rather than me having to manually update it.
... View more
09-21-2023
07:50 AM
|
0
|
0
|
10226
|
|
IDEA
|
The new Map Viewer (both AGOL and Enterprise) should have the ability to filter a layer's data by a date relative to the current date. For example, I have a layer of construction closures that have a start and endate as attributes. I want to apply a filter such that only records where the closing date occurs in the future would be displayed. With Map Viewer Classic, I believe you could edit the map's JSON in AGOL Assistant to implement this but I don't know if this is still possible with the new Map Viewer. Either way, users should have to hack their maps for a pretty standard date filter option. The choices would be something like: "occurs on.." <Specific Date | Today> "occurs on or after.." <Specific Date | Today> "occurs on or before.." <Specific Date | Today> It would be nice to also have some addition variants like "within the next week | within the next month" but a relative option like "today" should be the absolute minimum.
... View more
09-20-2023
11:15 AM
|
54
|
21
|
13486
|
|
IDEA
|
Yeah, thanks @arc_ticodex I was aware of the custom CSS option that Sites/Hub provides but this is far too basic functionality that ESRI should provide (especially since they provided it in other products like Classic Storymaps. Forcing users to resort to custom CSS is always a recipe for disaster.
... View more
09-19-2023
08:12 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1963
|
|
POST
|
If the data in Field1 is consistent, you can use the Split Arcade function to split the Field1 value based on spaces into an array. Then you can building your popup how you see fit.
... View more
09-14-2023
02:02 PM
|
2
|
0
|
1478
|
|
POST
|
Started working with with Sites (v10.91) and I'm frustrated by one thing (ok, many things but..) which is the save location of any pages that I create. When I created my Site, I saved it into a Content folder I had created for my project but I've noticed that any page I create gets dropped into the root level of my content and I have to manually move the page item into the folder I had created for the Site. Maybe I've missed it but is there setting someplace for specifying where pages that are created are saved in a Site project?
... View more
09-13-2023
08:31 AM
|
0
|
0
|
873
|
|
IDEA
|
Text cards should have a halo option for better readability. Since the crop on background images adjusts automatically as screen size changes, there's no guarantee that any text will always be legible over an image. A halo option (with hard/soft edge options) would solve this.
... View more
09-12-2023
09:23 AM
|
4
|
3
|
2032
|
|
IDEA
|
With Map Cards, I'd like to see a clickable link or a button underneath the map frame that would allow users to open that map, full size, in a new window. Since the row will expand to the tallest element, in my example, any link I try to add will be miles away from the map because the text on the left hand side is more than the height of the map. It just makes more sense to make this a supported option rather than me trying to kludge it in.
... View more
09-11-2023
01:28 PM
|
0
|
0
|
856
|
|
IDEA
|
For Hub Basic / Enterprise Sites, the Contact Info Card really has two options- the email address and the subject line for the email that would be generated. It would be useful if the "Contact Information" label was modifiable, both in text content and size. I have some pages developed about a capital project where I might want to list more than one contact and I'd like to have the label above the email link explain who might be the best person for someone to contact. For example, "For Design Questions, Contact.." or "For Environmental Related Questions, Contact.." etc. The default size of the card is large so a smaller option might be better when you want to have more than one contact displayed together.
... View more
09-11-2023
11:48 AM
|
0
|
0
|
973
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Friday | |
| 1 | Thursday | |
| 1 | Thursday | |
| 1 | Thursday | |
| 1 | Wednesday |