|
POST
|
@BryanMay531 I'm not sure actually, but my guess would be one of the fields that is using the EmptyStringtoNull method. Can you post the snippet for that method? I suspect it is returning something other than the Python representation of null (None).
... View more
02-29-2024
12:38 PM
|
1
|
3
|
3652
|
|
POST
|
The target field column in your data mapping sheet should be the literal field name (e.g. TargetField), the expression column should be a python expression to evaluate to your value (e.g. !SOURCEFIELD!). Check out this tutorial (https://learn.arcgis.com/en/projects/load-data-into-the-arcgis-utility-network/) for the basics of data mappings, along with a few more advanced scenarios like value lookups.
... View more
02-29-2024
11:59 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3744
|
|
POST
|
How many rows are returned when you run the GetCount geoprocessing tool (or when you open the attribute table)? This is how many dirty areas are 'active' in your version. How many rows are in the dirty areas table if you do a count statement directly against the table using SQL? This is the total number of active and historical records in your geodatabase.
... View more
02-29-2024
06:56 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1885
|
|
POST
|
@joecastellana I recommend you ignore the editor tracking on dirty areas, and here's why: When you reconcile your version, we re-create dirty areas for all the features that were edited in this version. This is so that when the edits are posted to sde.default we can update the network topology (using validate) where the network was edited in the version. This means that the dirty area will show the name of the user who reconciled the version, which may be different than the person who made the original edit.
... View more
02-29-2024
06:48 AM
|
2
|
0
|
4738
|
|
POST
|
@GavinMcGhieAs Mike said, there shouldn't be any problem with just adding the rule. It is my understanding that test points typically measure the current on the line that is connected to the anode, and not the anode itself (as seen in this article I'm sure you've read). This means that a test point's test wire is expected to be connected to a bonding line or cable, that wire is then connected to an anode. That is why the rules are configured that way. If your GIS doesn't have this level of detail or your test points are directly connected to your anodes via test wire in the field, add the rule.
... View more
02-27-2024
05:50 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1741
|
|
POST
|
Schneider Electric has created versions of these solutions on top of branch versioning if you are an ArcFM XI customer. If you are not an ArcFM XI customer and are looking for examples using core Esri products, I recommend you watch this presentation from this year's IMGIS (https://mediaspace.esri.com/playlist/dedicated/246131802/1_k4v1qmbb/1_hffdbe23). Houston Water's presentation includes a demonstration of how they're using ArcGIS Workflow Manager to track work and manage the workflows associated with their versions.
... View more
02-26-2024
11:26 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2227
|
|
POST
|
Yes, you can add new asset types after deploying a utility network, but you must disable the network topology. This is convenient because you'll also need to disable the network topology to make other configuration changes like adding rules, adding the asset type to any subnetwork definitions, etc. I recommend you check out the configuration changes section of the utility network management tasks for the full list of what you can and can't do (and when). Pay special attention to tasks that aren't allowed or "must be performed prior to the network topology being enabled for the first time".
... View more
02-26-2024
11:20 AM
|
2
|
0
|
4953
|
|
POST
|
@Isaac_King If this is a converted dataset, there may be other errors at that location preventing the tool from allowing you to connect the features. Try manually creating the junction and edge you have a rule for and see if it works. If this doesn't work, then there may be something with how you have your map configured (selectability, duplicate layers, etc) that is interfering with the tool. Add the utility network to a brand-new map and try again. If this still doesn't work, log a case with support. While there's no reason why this shouldn't work with ArcGIS Pro 3.0, I would recommend you stick to network management releases if possible. That way, you can apply patches that will include bug fixes for the utility network.
... View more
02-23-2024
06:57 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1493
|
|
POST
|
@MatheusSparapani Correct. you cannot configure a connectivity rule to constrain a junction to only connect to a single edge (causing a topology error to be created when this rule is violated). So, if users connect an end cap to two mains you can't create a topology error. However, you can write an attribute rule that would identify and return this as a validation error that could be managed similarly to any quality assurance checks you have configured in your database.
... View more
02-22-2024
09:31 AM
|
2
|
1
|
2922
|
|
POST
|
Unfortunately, junction edge rules only determine which features are allowed to connect but don't control the cardinality of the features that are allowed to connect. To do something like that you'd need to write something like a validation attribute rule to enforce the cardinality of connected lines.
... View more
02-22-2024
06:38 AM
|
1
|
1
|
3007
|
|
POST
|
That's not the expected behavior. Please post a screenshot and describe exactly how you placed this feature midspan on the line. The software doesn't snap features that aren't allowed to connect, so unless you're forcing them to be snapped it's likely that the midspan feature isn't coincident with the line.
... View more
02-22-2024
06:20 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1703
|
|
POST
|
@JohnAlsup By 'evaluate the asset group and asset type' in your code, do you mean you'll need to use the asset group of the feature to find the corresponding domain from the field on the subtype?
... View more
02-19-2024
06:53 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1561
|
|
POST
|
From your description I'm not sure what the problem is, can you post a screenshot and provide a little more detail on the expected/actual results? (are you connecting things without rules and expecting an error? are you referring to the initial error you received when the asset type was unknown?)
... View more
02-19-2024
06:51 AM
|
0
|
2
|
4444
|
|
POST
|
@NadiaAlami thank you for sharing this link, it was able to confirm my hypothesis (about the solution and that it was from a business partner). The web map that is being used has had normal group layers added to it with multiple copies of the device and layers added to it with definition queries applied. They describe this step in their previous video that shows you how to create the web map (https://youtu.be/rgUG5WzAeQ4?si=wWrmcd1ITlezo5JX&t=80). What you're seeing isn't subtype group layers or experience builder showing asset groups, it's just a collection of layers under a group layer with definition queries applied. They chose to do this using regular group layers, instead of subtype group layers, because the experience builder does not currently support subtype group layers, and they wanted to see their results separated out by asset group. Manually separating out your layers using definition queries is typically not recommended because of the performance cost (you have to query/render the same layer multiple times) but because it is only being done a handful of times this should still perform reasonably well.
... View more
02-16-2024
05:56 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1606
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Friday | |
| 1 | Friday | |
| 1 | Thursday | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|