Latest Contributions by RobertKrisher

Is the connection file using the credentials of the data owner? It sounds like there may be a difference in the connection files between the machines. If you copy one of the connection files from the other machines to this one, does it work?  ... View more

I like the idea of using Arcade to identify the nearest pole on-demand, you'll just need to make sure that your water editors have read-only access to the electric layers. If you combine both networks, then editors will need to have full read/write access to both datasets, and both editors will need to be careful with how they edit data. You'll also get some annoying scenarios like removing a pole as part of an electric design will cause a conflict with a water version because the water user added an association to that pole to a feature in their version. ... View more

Do not manually run SQL statements to clear out history, that is a sure-fire way to corrupt the versions in your geodatabase. Enabling the network topology populates the table with the new mappings. The safe way to manage the size of these tables is to Be considerate about how often you are disabling and enabling your network topology or performing bulk updates on branch versioned data. If you need to remove rows, use the Prune branch history tool (read more here). This will safely delete records older than a certain date. If you are not routinely performing other data maintenance tasks with your database, the tool will not be able to remove as much history. I know that sounds vague, read the link I provided above for a more precise description. ... View more

@PierreloupDucroix How would you configure the trace to stop at the first pole? Poles are part of the structure network, so they can't be used as barriers. I suppose you could trace to the first fitting or valve and see if it has a pole associated with it. For performance purposes I would think carefully about whether I wanted to turn on the update structure/domain container during update subnetwork. Do you really want to put the system, pressure tier, etc from your water network on your poles? Not only is it of limited value, but it will also make update subnetwork take longer to run (since it has to update all the poles in the network). ... View more

This is on the list of issues to be patched in 11.3. ... View more

@PragatiSingh there's lots of discussion here. You have two domain networks, and the assumption is that you want them to be in separate utility networks You could put them in the same utility network if you wanted them to share structures or had some other compelling reason, but that is not typical for water/electric. If you do want to have multiple utility networks, then you can have options. If you just want to manage one database, you can put them in the same database but give each one separate schemas. If you put them in the same schema you will get name conflicts on the structure classes (so you'll have structurejunction and structurejunction_1). If you want to manage them in separate databases, then you are free to do that using however many databases, instances, and servers that you want because the two utility networks are not related in any way. ... View more

@NathanGEOregon can you include a copy of the log from when you ran the tool? specifically I'm wondering if there are any warning messages for that field. ... View more

@PierreloupDucroixthe most common cause of this is by frequent enabling/disabling of the network topology. the table maps every feature to its corresponding network element. every time you disable/enable the network topology we must delete and recreate all the mappings. The table is versioned, so if you are doing this frequently and not managing your conflicts and history than the table can become large. ... View more

There was a bug that was fixed in one of the more recent releases of Pro that fixed an issue with snapping not working when the map was reprojecting the utility network (i.e. utility network is a state plane but the map was something else). ... View more

@SanneMikkelsen here is the link to the current data dictionary: UPDM_dynamic. The links to the data dictionaries can change slightly over time (in this case the change to the dynamic html report broke teh link). The most reliable way to access data dictionary for a solution is to visit the solution and use the link in the solution overview to access the data dictionary:   ... View more

I hope that your database is also in AWS, and that you've read the guidance in the ArcGIS Architecture Center. Specifically, about the importance of minimizing the latency between the ArcGIS Enterprise and the Database Server. The attribute rules can be configured to run on the client side or the server side. When they are run client-side they still need to make queries to the ArcGIS Server to satisfy the data requests. When the rules are run server-side they run on ArcGIS Server. ... View more