Latest Contributions by BrianBulla

I have zero experience with Indoors, but aren't there templates you can use where you could create a bunch of "Level 3" features that automatically have that field set to "3"?? ... View more

And to add to this....the WIDTH seems to size properly, the HEIGHT seems to be the one with the problem. ... View more

Hi, I'm running into this issue also with 3.2 where the ProWindow does not match the size of the HEIGHT and WIDTH in the xaml code. Using the SizeToContent sort of works, but really just as a work-around as you may (or may not) have to modify the elements of your form to really make that work and not have a weird looking form. The same code work in 2.x for me, so there must be a glich in 3.x that is causing the form not to size properly. ... View more

After finally getting back to this, I can confirm that the BUG fix for this is working.....yeah!! ... View more

Thanks....yeah, this only came up after we moved the SQL database I connect to, to a new server.  I told them I will need to update/recompile my code and now our IT Security Team is suggesting that I take the connection string out of the code.  I'll need to do some research I guess. ... View more

I guess the "Other Versions" dropdown on this link is what I am looking for. https://doc.arcgis.com/en/experience-builder/10.9/configure-widgets/table-widget.htm   ... View more

Thanks @SteveCole .  Do you know if there is documentation anywhere that would say if the Table widget already exists in some version of Portal??  Perhaps we just need an upgrade on our end. ... View more

Can't you just modify your editing template so it comes up as "No" instead of "N"?   ... View more

Hi @TracyLove .  Yes, it sounds like you understand what I am trying to do.  I agree, I don't think it's possible, but really is something that should be able to be done.  Back in the summer I sat in on a Field Maps webinar where they said that Attribute Rules would soon be coming to Field Maps, and that what I was trying to do should be able to work. Even at the Dev Summit I talked to esri people who said it should work too, but alas.....nothing works. We are looking at using VertiGIS Mobile for this now, but I really hate that application.  I think we can get it to work, but it's such a klunky application and to get things working takes a lot of trial and error.  Field Maps is much more user friendly. Right within ArcPro I can get everything I was to do working with Attribute Rules, it's just within Field Maps that I can't get thing working. ... View more

Yes, that would change the value for the CHAINS field in the INSPECTION form, but what I need it to do is to change the INSP_STATUS on the hydrant feature. ... View more

Hi Doug, Thanks for helping. So I am setting this code on the respective field on the "Inspections" form.  See the screenshot below:   Now if I change the code as per your advice above to this: var allHydrants = FeaturesetByName($datastore, 'Hydrants', ['FACILITYID', 'ObjectID'], false); var facility_id = $feature.FACILITYKEY; //this should be the ID of the currently selected hydrant var thisHydrant = First(Filter(allHydrants, 'FACILITYID = @facility_id')); //If the CHAINS field gets toggled to "YES" in the collection form, then we need to update the INSP_STATUS attribute on the feature to YES if (($feature.CHAINS != "NO")) { //abort if no hydrant was found if (thisHydrant == null){return}; return "WR"; };   Now when I do this, I still don't get what I want.  What is happening is that a "WR" is now getting substituted for the "switch" control.  But what I want, is for the switch control to update the feature based on wether or not the switch is in the No or Yes position.....if that makes any sense.   Ultimately what I want to do is replicate what we currently have working in our ArcPad inspection applications.  So the user clicks on a hydrant, an inspection form opens up and based on what is selected in the inspection form, the INSP_STATUS field on the hydrant gets updated.....either to "WR" (work required) or to "YES" (a completed inspection with no issues). All of these Inspections are saved in a related table to the hydrant....the INSPECTIONS table.  I guess with Field Maps we could have the technician doing the inspection manually toggle the INSP_STATUS on the feature after each inspection to either WR or YES, but I'm trying to avoid them having to do that, as ultimately that will get screwed up in the field and hydrants that should be at WR will get missed. Currently in ArcPad, this all automated through a script when they hit the "Save" button at the end of the inspection.  So ideally with Field Maps, once they hit the "Submit" button after they fill out the entire inspection form, is where this business logic would happen to determine how to update the INSP_STATUS field on the hydrant.  For now, I am just trying to get it to work with the one field CHAINS, but in reality I would need to look at about 10 different fields before I determine whether to set it to WR or to YES. Hopefully this makes sense.  This is something I've been trying to sort out with esri for years, and there is still no solution.  I've met with people at the Dev Summit, sat in countless web demos of Fields  Maps and still there is no solution to this. Hopefully you have some ideas that can point me in the right direction. Recently I've looked at the Maps SDK, but I'd like to stick to something more simpler than redeveloping all 9 of our field inspections apps from scratch in the Maps SDK.  Not sure we have the manpower for that. ... View more

Yeah, it seems like once you use a calculated expression, there is no way to 'overwrite' it in the form....which is a bit of a bummer. ... View more

Well, I coded it like that since when I was doing this in ArcGIS Pro, that was the only way I could get it to work.  I'm trying to update an attribute in a feature, not make any change to the form. Either way, I don't think FieldMaps has the ability to do what I want to do.  I've tried this so many ways, it's making my head spin.  I think I just need to come to the realization that Field Maps just can't do it and look at other options. VertiGIS seems to be able to do it, but I hate that application so much.  It's such a pain to work with. ... View more