|
POST
|
I too would love to know the answers to your questions. I just discovered we have locks going back 18 months to the database creation and trying to figure out what ones are safe to delete/disconnect.
... View more
04-19-2023
04:36 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2599
|
|
POST
|
@MarlonAmayaIs it safe to run purge lock against sde.Default? I have just discovered hundreds of shared locks on sde.Default going back over 18 months. No sure why these aren't getting deleted.
... View more
04-19-2023
09:49 AM
|
0
|
0
|
4536
|
|
POST
|
Thank you both for your suggestions. I think we will take the approach of creating individual "initial commit" records for each polygon. I also like the idea of adding a record type for these. I will then work on assigning existing line-work to the initial records based on a spatial join.
... View more
03-29-2023
01:22 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3390
|
|
POST
|
We have started seeing sever errors in the ArcGIS Server Error logs if the form CleanForwardEdits failure (sessionID: {xxxx}, moment: 45014.728694) Invalid branch moment [version_name] The errors happen on a particular feature service. This feature service contains a Parcel Fabric, I don't know if this is relevant. I have talked to the editors and can't find the source. Is anybody familiar with the cause of these errors?
... View more
03-29-2023
01:04 PM
|
1
|
2
|
1279
|
|
POST
|
Validating work in the error inspector results in sometimes hundreds of errors that various lines and polygons MUST HAVE A RECORD. We did not create records for a large part of our data when we migrated to the parcel fabric. Our lot, parcel and subdivision parcel types do have records but our preexisting line work and administrative polygons do not. There is no legal document that we can tie these feature too and that is the bases of the records we initially created. The large number of MUST HAVE A RECORDS errors are distracting to the editors and they often miss other more important errors due to the long list. Do other organizations have this issue? If so how have you dealt with it? I am considering creating a sort of master parent record for all out millions of lines and another for each of our polygon parcel types that don't currently have records. Is this a valid approach? Any suggestions greatly appreciated.
... View more
03-28-2023
11:22 AM
|
0
|
7
|
3449
|
|
POST
|
Great. Thank you for the clarification and the advice.
... View more
03-08-2023
09:25 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1101
|
|
POST
|
I have code that checks certain things in the EditCompleted event in a Pro extension. If certain conditions aren't met for certain edits I'd like to cancel the edit operation. Is it appropriate to call Project.Current.UndoEditAsync(); inside the EditCompleted event? I'm concerned that the edit that is just completing hasn't been added to the edit stack yet and I might actually undo a previous edit. Testing don't indicate this is a problem but I want to make sure.
... View more
03-06-2023
03:29 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1132
|
|
POST
|
@HusseinNasser2Does this bug also potentially affect immediate attribute rules? I've had problems in the past getting rules to work when they are applied to a subtype. But the same rule works fine when applied to the whole feature class. Unfortunately it's inconsistent behavior and I can can't duplicate the issue consistantly.
... View more
01-25-2023
11:12 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2734
|
|
POST
|
return Geometry($feature).Y will only work on point features. Try this instead: return Centroid(Geometry($feature)).Y
... View more
01-13-2023
01:39 PM
|
1
|
0
|
3680
|
|
POST
|
I played around with your suggestion of using different combinations of cursors and field calculate both inside and outside an edit session and every time the update worked the editor tracking also got triggered. I was using direct database connects and not the feature service. So looks like I'll have to figure out another method, probably use the non esri approved direct SQL. Thanks for your help Lance.
... View more
01-11-2023
12:33 PM
|
0
|
3
|
4579
|
|
POST
|
I really don't want to go down the path of disabling editor tracking or unregistering the versioning. I went through this before back in the arcmap days and I found it very messy, especially when the feature class was part of a complex dataset like Fabric or Network.
... View more
01-11-2023
09:03 AM
|
0
|
5
|
4603
|
|
POST
|
We have a feature class that is part of a parcel fabric. The feature class is branch versioned and published through a feature service. I need to do a bulk update on all features and don't wish to trigger the editor tracking attributes. In ArcMap I was able to do this by doing a field calc outside of an edit session. Is there an equivalent way of doing this in Pro with branch versioned data?
... View more
01-10-2023
02:09 PM
|
0
|
12
|
6022
|
|
POST
|
Our organization has our roads geometry in the Fabric connection lines feature class as part of a Fabric. The connection lines have a related table with road attributes. We want to allow outside organizations (different emergency service organizations) access to the attribute table to update them. They will not be making geometry updates to the connection lines. If each organization has a named user editor account in our portal will we need to assign that account the Parcel Fabric extension? Can we publish a separate feature service containing just the related table without the fabric connection lines in it? We would add a standalone copy of road gemetry from a separate feature class.
... View more
12-18-2022
10:48 AM
|
0
|
0
|
756
|
|
IDEA
|
Another up vote for this. Worried that parcel lines in the parcel fabric will grow to tens of millions of records as we deal with fixing densified lines. A single cul-de-sac can produce hundreds of parcel lines when the build parcels tool is run. This is replicated across several parcel types. Even after the densified lines are converted to curves I'm worried that the hundreds/thousands of really short segments will stick around in perpetuity slowing queries and eating up space.
... View more
12-15-2022
02:57 PM
|
0
|
0
|
7197
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 09-19-2023 09:32 AM | |
| 1 | 01-21-2025 01:39 PM | |
| 1 | 07-29-2025 10:45 AM | |
| 1 | 07-17-2025 03:33 PM | |
| 1 | 07-10-2025 10:30 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
3 weeks ago
|