Latest Contributions by curtvprice

Maybe use the Copy Features tool instead of Export Features? ... View more

Here's an application of the conditional check Shitij is suggesting to use the county dataset you want based on the coordinate system of the input raster: ... View more

The first code sample in the help does it exactly the way you're doing it, so I'm kind of mystified too. ... View more

I very much appreciate you sharing your approach here and I agree with it. OneDrive is working much better than it did several years ago and I have heard anecdotal evidence that your approach is working for a lot of people (although not supported), and I will reiterate this advice (based on the school of hard knocks): Always keep on this device to avoid latency when first accessing files (or datasets composed of many files like gdb, shapefiles, rasters with many aux files) Avoid multiuser editing of a workspace - this is no different from a network share, except with OneDrive you can and should enforce this with sharing settings! Pause sync to avoid performance hits and possible latency/collision instability when doing heavy editing or geoprocessing. Non-ArcGIS tip - multi user editing of O365 documents (Word, Excel etc) is supported by Microsoft, but I have had best luck editing using the online editing, letting O365 deal with conflicts while you are editing on the server side instead of depending on sync of the desktop to resolve conflicts, which can cause creation of local copies if things go wrong (especially across Mac/PC or if there are sync latency issues). This works great once you get used to seeing someone else editing while you are! ... View more

At least make import71.exe and a workflow posted somewhere (copy features from coverage folder). At this point there is no easy workaround outside of interop extension which is very complex and of course requires an extra license. ... View more

Best way to start is to create the .pyt from the ArcGIS Pro catalog window which will give you a complete framework stub ready to go with all the required pieces. ... View more

This looks fantastic! What a great opportunity to put old content (often concerning old functionality or bugs long fixed) out of the way and move forward. Thank you ModelBuilder team, esp @ShitijMehta  for taking this step! ... View more

If the shapefile is temporary, you can make the model more 'transportable' by using the model variable scratchFolder:  %scratchFolder%\temp.shp - this will automatically use a writeable path (usually "scratch" in the same folder as your default gdb). ... View more

There are a limited number of defined transformations in ArcGIS, and sometimes you need to combine several to get from A to B.  For example there may be a transformation A to X and X to B so you include both to get there. Some are not defined at all and I would contact Esri support for help with a custom one. Here is the help page to get started: Geographic datum transformations   ... View more

The NHD does have 'microgaps' and almost-coincident nodes that can break things. I saw a demo of trace network in an NHD call a couple years ago when they disabled validating as you did to avoid these problems causing the network to fail. Based on that demo I think you did the right thing! ... View more

Dissolve - I didn't think of that!  Summary Statistics is entirely equivalent to the ArcMap right click summarize  (with more functionality, including multiple case items). Note that in ArcGIS Pro, a right click summarize there opens the Summary Statistics tool. ... View more

And if you are in a hurry or something isn't working, exporting to csv and loading from there has always worked for me, easily, in all versions of Pro. ... View more

Here are are a few tools that may work for you: Summary Statistics (this is the tool equivalent to your right-click / Summarize interactive workflow) Frequency (requires ArcInfo license) Delete Identical Hope this helps you out! ... View more

The NHDPlus I was referring to is the NHDPlusHR which is built on the full resolution data, not the 1:100K scale features. Are the data you were looking at NHDPlusHR or NHDPlus v21? There certainly could be some errors in there, or an issue with your join, I'm not sure. There is attribution within the NHDPlus VAA (STARTFLAG) that identifies all headwater flowlines if that's what you are looking for. I certainly endorse this idea though, it would be a great thing to have available, especially since elevation derived hydro is all the rage.   ... View more