|
IDEA
|
Basically, the individual user account needs a paid mobile worker option that doesn't require an organization. This is for small company workers doing things like tree-stumping, lighting repairs or rink setups. They don't have a GIS department and aren't particularly computer savvy so maintaining and managing an organization is too much for them. We want them to update what they are doing through a field maps app that we provide to them. (*** This would have been better when tracking wasn't included in mobile worker, we don't need them to create tracks just update data. We want a way for them to easily pay for a user account so they can use an app that we create by inviting them to the group. Even if we had to run the side organization with one creator and there was a way to allow them to individually purchase mobile workers, that would be fine too, we just don't want to have to collect the money for their licenses and don't want their numbers to come out of our license.
... View more
05-15-2024
09:04 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3397
|
|
POST
|
Looks like AGOL might have an issue with one of their servers. We export about 80 layers to open data daily using Python and ArcPro and one won't update and hasn't for some time. If we rename and export it, it works so not on our side or the pro document. All others export through the script and manually as expected. Error messages are likely not related to the issue, I suspect the 400 means it is not in the index at Esri so there is possibly a bad cluster or re-indexing needed. Status: InProgress StatusMessage: Server Response: ERROR: code:400, Unable to delete item. This service item has a related Service item, Bad syntax in request. Status: InProgress StatusMessage: Publishing tool execution failed Status: Failed ErrorMessage: Failed to publish web layer We had a similar issue in 2020 where every 8th or so person could not get into a survey123 app and it turned out to be a bad cluster and once Esri re-indexed or did their magic the issue was resolved. The item is our roads layer in open data if it helps Esri find which server has an issue because I am pretty sure this is an AGOL issue, not a local one.
... View more
05-15-2024
07:27 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2731
|
|
IDEA
|
We are increasingly being asked to create apps to track work being done by contractors doing work for the municipality. Currently, we need to create an account for them under our organization. We would prefer that they pay for a mobile user account and not be part of our organization. They don't need their own organization just an account for whoever is using the app. We don't want them to have access to our organization just the apps we give them access to and we don't want the accounts to come out of our ELA numbers, they can purchase them separately. I think if Esri created a public paid mobile account and then allowed organizations to add them to groups using the username that would solve our issue. They wouldn't be able to create anything in AGOL just access apps that have been made for them.
... View more
05-14-2024
06:34 AM
|
11
|
9
|
3432
|
|
IDEA
|
ArcPro and AGOL also do not work well with Big integer. We don't have anything that is a big integer and only use long. If you look at the layer in ArcCatelog it shows as long integer but the data design view of the same layer shows it as big integer. If we export to AGOL it gives a warning message about big integer and sure enough, it is big integer in AGOL. I guess the bug is in ArcPro 3.2.2. Please fix
... View more
05-06-2024
04:09 PM
|
0
|
0
|
9505
|
|
POST
|
This issue comes out of a desire to print dashboards. We can do it if we embed them in experience builder but you can't have stacked elements. We have gotten around this but creating multiple dashboards using the same data source all on a single experience builder page. The issue is when we want to filter the data (say by county). We want all the dashboards to use the filter and have added the filter to each one but the user must set it in each dashboard for all three dashboards to show the correct information. Has anyone figured out a way to put in a filter for a group of dashboards? Possibly editing the JSON of the second and third to use the filter from the first or something like that. We need a way to make sure all of them are using the same filter before people print them or even look at them.
... View more
04-19-2024
09:53 AM
|
0
|
0
|
794
|
|
IDEA
|
Please bring the fix to the shape field not being visible when publishing a service that you had in ArcMap to Pro. Now we only have Select Layer in TOC and then have to open each table, then open field view to turn the shape field on, then save and close the field view. That is a lot of unnecessary steps for something that would have taken a second to fix in ArcMap. Someone must have a python script to do it but this is a clear oversight when they were building Pro.
... View more
04-02-2024
06:36 AM
|
9
|
4
|
1927
|
|
IDEA
|
Add field view to TOC right-click list. There are way too many steps to turn on a field in Pro. Please add the Field View to the TOC. I shouldn't have to open the table view and then select Field View to turn fields on and off, let us go directly to the field view from the TOC
... View more
04-02-2024
06:25 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1333
|
|
IDEA
|
Why should we have to create, maintain and train on two apps for every project? Staff love Field Maps, it should have been released for natively for Windows right away. We don't need an experience for editing, we just need to use the same great field editing app on a desktop.
... View more
03-08-2024
10:39 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3335
|
|
IDEA
|
That would work and it would mean we wouldn't have to make and maintain two apps for every task (one in field maps and one for in the office) We could just consume the original field map with the widget and be able to use it on any device including windows desktops.
... View more
01-16-2024
09:35 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2370
|
|
IDEA
|
I can answer that. We have two issues related to the subsystem. The first is our server are not compatible with Windows 11 so it will be a while before we can upgrade from Windows 10. At the same time, I asked about the subsystem and they said it was a security risk so they would not approve it. Perhaps both opinions and restrictions have changed by now. It would be helpful if there was a white paper explaining how it all works and why it is not a risk that we could take to our network and security teams to try and convince them. As far as why we need it. We have field staff that use Field maps in the field. When they come into the office or their supervisors are in the office, they use their computers to make updates. We also have support staff that are in the office that enter data as well. All three groups would like their app on the computer to look and feel like the one in the field. Instead, we need to try and replicate the app using web application builder or experience builder. It would be so much simpler to just have one field map that can be used in the field and in the office rather than having to create two apps to do the same thing. Additionally, some of our field staff use tablets. This is both for the screen real estate and so they can keep utilities drawings that are pulled up through hyperlinks in a local viewer from their laptops. There are thousands of drawings and tablets do not have enough storage space. They use a local copy of data and the plans for emergency use when there is no power or internet so can not switch to using a tablet. They would also like to have field maps on the laptops. Let me know if you have any additional questions. Thanks Melanie Melanie Wawryk MSc. GISP
... View more
01-12-2024
09:17 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3050
|
|
IDEA
|
Thanks that is a good suggestion. Ideally, it would be nice if there was a config file where you could specify codes you don't want to see in the manager log window. The admin filter works all right; you need to switch to the admin though and add in the dates. Having an additional filter like the one in admin for codes when looking through the manager log would be a nice addition. Alternatively, Esri could move that error to verbose or fine since it doesn't impact the server in any meaningful way and you were already warned about it when publishing.
... View more
01-09-2024
12:29 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2192
|
|
IDEA
|
The Group warning 17001 is unnecessary and only serves to clog up the log making it difficult to read. It already warns us that groups are not used in Feature services when publishing but they are useful in map services so we still use them. There should be a spot to remove common and unnecessary errors from logs like 17001.
... View more
01-09-2024
06:02 AM
|
6
|
3
|
2300
|
|
IDEA
|
It is a huge security risk having "Use in ArcGIS Field Maps Mobile" enabled by default. This should be an easy fix to have it off by default. @HollyTorpey_LSA I agree much easier to remember to enable it because you are actively working on creating the app. A bit of an oversight that should be corrected ASAP 🙏
... View more
01-09-2024
05:37 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1085
|
|
POST
|
Any chance you could get rid of the Type of Layer: 'Name of group' is 'Group Layer', which is not supported. It really clogs up the logs
... View more
12-30-2023
09:14 AM
|
0
|
0
|
6403
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Tuesday | |
| 6 | 03-26-2026 01:08 PM | |
| 3 | 02-10-2025 09:11 AM | |
| 7 | 10-24-2024 08:36 AM | |
| 11 | 05-14-2024 06:34 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|