POST
|
Hi! Thanks for the tip! However, what Im trying to do is to use the same widgets with another webmap in which the layers are the same except for one more that is securised...
... View more
05-03-2022
12:05 PM
|
0
|
0
|
376
|
POST
|
Hi, I am trying to use the config url parameter to have alternative versions of an application. I wonder if there is a way to edit other configs file in the WAB interface? For instance, I can load an application using the config url parameter with an url like https://mydomain/webappbuilder/apps/33/?config=config_2.json but it seems I can't open and edit that config_2.json in the WAB interface. When entering edit/configuration mode with such url https://mydomain/webappbuilder/?id=33&config=config_2.json this is the config.json that is loaded, not config_2.json. The config url parameter is not used. Is there a way to achieve what Im trying to do? Thanks
... View more
05-03-2022
08:20 AM
|
0
|
2
|
409
|
POST
|
Hello, Maybe, I am wrong, but since the february 2022 update, every project or plan created within Urban has its own database that can be shared with a Urban model. Before the update, the owner/creator of the project or plan had the possibility to copy its work into the urban database instead of sharing it. From the documentation: https://doc.arcgis.com/fr/urban/data/data-model.htm Note: In earlier versions ofArcGIS Urban, it was necessary to copy plans or project to the urban database to share them with the public. With the February 2022 release, this process has been replaced with the ability to directly share plans and projects with everyone. Seeshare a planandshare a projectto learn more about managing access to plans and projects. Plans and projects that have been made public in earlier versions remain stored in the urban database and are still shown in the overview to users who have access to the public view. SeeView an urban modelto learn more about managing access to the public view. Before the update we were using a view on the Urban model database (the UrbanEvents sublayer for projects) to be able to display the projects created in Urban in another AGOL application like a web map and web app builder. Now, we notice that the projects created after the update are not in the Urban model database, and it seems now that only the urban model owner can import them. My question is there a way to get all the projects or plans that are shared with a urban model in a single database without having to import them seperately into the model which can only be done now by the owner of the model and not the users that own the projects or plans? Thank you very much! Best regards, Maxime Demers
... View more
04-22-2022
08:32 AM
|
1
|
1
|
529
|
POST
|
Hi Agnieszka, Thank you for your answer. That make a lot of sense. I understand the roll back is on failure and 504 is not necessary a failure, most of the time it will be a success. As the timeout is not defined at the client level, but in the API server, I cannot increase the timeout value, right? Is there a possibility to make async requests that wont timeout? From what I understand, in case of 504, the only way I can know if the parcels were created or not is to make a query to the database and check if those parcels exist? Thank you again for your time with my questions. Best regards, Maxime Demers
... View more
04-22-2022
06:38 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1103
|
POST
|
Hi, I am using the Urban API to create parcels in batch, but sometimes I am facing the 504 timeout error even if I keep the number of features per call under 200. My question is, is there a rollback when an error occur? I see in the error json that there is a rollbackOnFailure property set to true, but when I take a look in Urban, I see that the parcels were created even when there was a 504. If there is a rollback I could try again the call when it failed, but if there is no rollback it will be difficult to check if those parcels are already created or not. Thank you for the precision! Maxime Demers
... View more
04-21-2022
01:37 PM
|
0
|
3
|
1168
|
IDEA
|
Actually, we can categorize projects by status and this is very useful. However, it could be very interesting for us to be able to categorize also by types. For instance: Type: Social housing Status: Pending Type: Promoter Status: Accepted Etc...
... View more
04-14-2022
08:20 AM
|
0
|
1
|
599
|
POST
|
Thank you! You are absolutely right, the transformation was different in Pro. However there was no transformation in ArcMap but in Pro it was defined to WGS 1984 (ITRF00) to NAD 1983. Is it ok to not use any transformation at all? Is there a way to make Pro not use any transformation as default in any project?
... View more
04-13-2022
11:19 AM
|
0
|
0
|
441
|
POST
|
Hi, I have noticed something with ArcGIS Pro 2.7. Im displaying a feature class that is projected in NAD83 MTM7 (wkid 32187) over a basemap in WGS84 (wkid 3857) and there is an offset between the feature class and the basemap that does not occur when displaying the same dataset and basemap in ArcMap. Here you can see the feature class is aligned to the basemap in ArcMap Here you can see the same dataset and basemap in Pro with the offset I have noticed the offset is present with all my dataset that is in NAD83 MTM7. What could be the cause of this offset? Thank you!
... View more
04-13-2022
10:43 AM
|
0
|
2
|
459
|
POST
|
With further research, I have discover that AGOL is caching scene layer geometries locally in the IndexedDB. The problem however is that they are using the scene layer request url as the primary key wich is not based on the item id but the name of the layer. That means the solution would be to republish the scene layer under a different name, and never use a name that was previously used if you dont want that kind of problem. ESRI, should do something about this...
... View more
04-12-2022
07:00 AM
|
0
|
0
|
506
|
POST
|
Hi, I have published a Scene Layer to AGOL with Pro 2.7. The scene layer is a multipatch layer of buildings. The buildings are using a simple plain white texture. I have published the scene layer with the same name of a previous scene layer that I had previously deleted from AGOL. Now when I open the scene layer in the scene viewer, I still see some of the old scene layer buildings, wich was using an orange texture. Also, some buildings are just missing. However, if I open the scene layer using the private mode of my browser, the orange buildings are not visible and the scene layer is displayed correctly. The scene layer in scene viewer (normal browser mode) The same scene layer in the scene viewer (private browser mode) I have rebuild the cache of the scene layer but that does not solve the problem. The cache seems to be in the browser. Is there any solution for this? Thank you!
... View more
04-12-2022
06:32 AM
|
0
|
1
|
516
|
POST
|
Hi, I just want to let you know that I have raised an issue at the uBlock filters lists repo and asked for adding an exception for urban.arcgis.com inside the list. https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets/issues/12436
... View more
03-25-2022
07:16 AM
|
0
|
1
|
905
|
POST
|
Hello @DominikAllemann , We invited you to join our AOL organization "Ville de Sherbrooke". Those scenes (mentionned by @BertrandCzerwinski) were shared with the group you were invited in. Im not really used to share content with people outside our organization, so please tell me if something is not working. Also, we could share our Urban model if that may helps you to reproduce the problem. Thank you for your help!
... View more
03-23-2022
08:45 AM
|
0
|
3
|
943
|
POST
|
03-21-2022
01:13 PM
|
0
|
0
|
242
|
POST
|
Hi, We have noticed that probably since the last Urban update, the buildings in projects scenarios are not toggled off when switching scenarios. This behaviour can sometimes make it impossible to see the current scenario building because it looks like it is merged within the building from the previous scenario. It might be a good idea to be able to see many scenarios simultaneously but making it the default behaviour is not ideal according to our point of view. Is this behaviour normal? We also noticed that the projects scenarios buildings stay visible even when we quit the project... that's not ideal neither according to us. Thank you for your return on this!
... View more
03-21-2022
07:28 AM
|
0
|
7
|
992
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 08-30-2021 06:44 AM | |
1 | 08-30-2021 07:07 AM | |
1 | 08-30-2021 08:21 AM | |
1 | 11-28-2023 02:02 PM | |
1 | 12-04-2023 05:58 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
06-09-2024
06:13 PM
|