|
POST
|
Hi Ted, ListVersions should return only what that user has permissions to see. Make sure that you are connecting to the same workspace both when running ListVersions as well as when running reconcile. Try setting the workspace environment at the start of your script.
import arcpy
arcpy.env.workspace = r"Database Connections\zzzyyyxxx_tcronin@sdemapper@ACR-GIS2@TestServer.sde"
...
I did not see in your script where you referenced reconcile. However in the error message the syntax looks incorrect. arcpy.ReconcileVersion_management (versionList, version, 'ACR_FINAL.Master', "BY_OBJECT", "FAVOR_TARGET_VERSION", "NO_LOCK_AQUIRED", "NO_ABORT", "NO_POST") From what I am seeing above you are passing in your versionList where you should be providing a workspace. If you want to run the reconcile for each version you will need to do something like this:
import arcpy
arcpy.env.workspace = r"Database Connections\zzzyyyxxx_tcronin@sdemapper@ACR-GIS2@TestServer.sde"
workspace = arcpy.env.workspace
versionList = arcpy.ListVersions ()
versionList.remove('dbo.DEFAULT')
versionList.remove('ACR_FINAL.Master')
for version in versionList:
arcpy.ReconcileVersion_management (workspace, version, 'ACR_FINAL.Master', "BY_OBJECT", "FAVOR_TARGET_VERSION", "NO_LOCK_AQUIRED", "NO_ABORT", "NO_POST")
#this is assuming that 'ACR_FINAL.Master is the parent version to all other versions in the list.
... View more
06-22-2010
07:13 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1247
|
|
POST
|
Jon, The intent of the Geodatabase and ArcSDE forums are to capture all information as it pertains to these topics. Our decision to go with the current structure was from user feedback indicating that the previous versions of the forums were too fragmented (there were 17 related to Geodatabase and ArcSDE combined). This resulted in cross posts to multiple forums in an attempt to get answers to questions. Our hope is that having lots of people looking at fewer forums rather than a few people looking at lots of forums will result in a larger community of users seeing more conversations. That said, we may have gone a bit too far with the Geodatabase and ArcSDE forum. We expect to modify the categories based on activity and user feedback. During the beta, the combined Geodatabase & ArcSDE forum seemed to work well. As traffic on the forum increases, we'll consider and quickly decide when and how it needs to be split. Input like yours helps us a great deal, so we appreciate your time to post this.
... View more
05-04-2010
03:01 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1240
|
|
POST
|
Ted/Bart, Rather than trying to troubleshoot this through the forums can you guys log support incidents with us. I think it will be faster to get an answer that way. Russell
... View more
03-04-2010
07:07 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2461
|
|
POST
|
Hi RudinA, There is currently an enhancement request in our system to implement this functionality: NIM050307 - Option to attach the old archive table (_h) back to the original feature class on re-enabling archiving. After disabling archiving on a feature class it is not possible to then enable archiving and still have the original archive class be associated with the feature class. Each time archiving is enabled a new archive class is created. This is currently a known limitation in the software and is not something that will be updated in ArcGIS 10.
... View more
03-03-2010
07:38 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1164
|
|
POST
|
Hi Cory, Please contact support. We will be able to help troubleshoot this issue.
... View more
03-03-2010
05:41 AM
|
0
|
0
|
408
|
|
POST
|
Hi Beta users, We would like to get some feedback from our Beta users regarding your Geodatabase upgrades. We are looking to hear about any of the following: - Problems/errors upgrading - Usability >>> Was it hard to figure out? How did you figure out what to do? - Documentation >>> Was there anything that wasn�??t clear in the doc? Was the doc hard to find? - Suggestions >>> Is there anything that you would like to see improved about the new upgrade experience? It doesn�??t all have to be problems you have encountered, let us know what you liked as well :). Please let us know what type of Geodatabase you are upgrading, what was the pre-upgrade release, and if it was ArcSDE what DBMS and platform. We are working hard to make this release the best yet and your feedback is greatly appreciated.
... View more
02-02-2010
08:47 AM
|
0
|
10
|
1730
|
|
POST
|
The Initial Data File Size used to be 40 MB, and now it is showing 100 MB, is this the expected behavior? Can you provide some more information about exactly what you are seeing?
... View more
02-01-2010
02:35 PM
|
0
|
0
|
891
|
|
POST
|
Micah, There is a geoprocessing tool 'Create File GDB' which will allow you to create an empty geodatabase at version 9.4, 9.3 or 9.2. After using this tool you could then use ArcGIS Desktop 9.4 to copy data from a 9.4 File Geodatabase to a 9.3 or 9.2 File Geodatabase which would enable you to view data in previous ArcGIS Desktop versions. Edit: This functionality will be available at Bata 2.
... View more
01-06-2010
01:40 PM
|
0
|
0
|
431
|
|
POST
|
Please contact support and we can work with you ensure this is logged into our system correctly.
... View more
12-17-2009
01:43 PM
|
0
|
0
|
713
|
|
POST
|
Thanks Bart, I have forwarded this information on to our documentation team.
... View more
12-14-2009
06:51 AM
|
0
|
0
|
251
|
|
POST
|
Countygis, Take a look at the following help topics regarding field types. Data Types in the DBMS http://help.esri.com/en/arcgisdesktop/9.4/help/index.htm#/Data-types-in-the-DBMS/005S0000000Q000000/ Geodatabase field data types http://help.esri.com/en/arcgisdesktop/9.4/help/index.htm#/Geodatabase-field-data-types/005S0000000P000000/ A comparison of ArcGIS - ArcSDE - and SQL Server data types http://help.esri.com/en/arcgisdesktop/9.4/help/index.htm#/A-comparison-of-ArcGIS--ArcSDE--and-SQL-Server-data-types/002Q00000068000000/ For building DBMS joins you might want to check out Query Layers which are new in 9.4. What is a query layer http://help.esri.com/en/arcgisdesktop/9.4/help/index.htm#/What-is-a-query-layer-/006600000083000000/ Preparing to use query layers http://help.esri.com/en/arcgisdesktop/9.4/help/index.htm#/Preparing-to-use-query-layers/006600000084000000/ Creating a query layer http://help.esri.com/en/arcgisdesktop/9.4/help/index.htm#/Creating-a-query-layer/006600000086000000/ Working with a query layer in ArcMap http://help.esri.com/en/arcgisdesktop/9.4/help/index.htm#/Working-with-a-query-layer-in-ArcMap/006600000089000000/ Choosing a unique id field http://help.esri.com/en/arcgisdesktop/9.4/help/index.htm#/Choosing-a-unique-identifier-field/006600000087000000/ Defining the spatial reference of the query layer http://help.esri.com/en/arcgisdesktop/9.4/help/index.htm#/Defining-the-spatial-reference-of-the-query-layer/006600000088000000/ Modifying a query layer http://help.esri.com/en/arcgisdesktop/9.4/help/index.htm#/Modifying-a-query-layer/00660000008M000000/ Connecting to a database http://help.esri.com/en/arcgisdesktop/9.4/help/index.htm#/Connecting-to-a-database/006600000085000000/
... View more
12-09-2009
05:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
519
|
|
POST
|
FYI... http://forumsbeta.esri.com/showthread.php?t=630
... View more
12-07-2009
05:31 AM
|
0
|
0
|
331
|
|
POST
|
To elaborate on what Eugene stated earlier. The structure/schema of the 9.4 Geodatabase system tables have been simplified and consolidated into fewer tables, as compared to previous schemas. This was done for a number of reasons, among them: �?� Provide more open access to the geodatabase through XML �?� Improve scalability and performance �?� Provide a mechanism to more easily implement new geodatabase functionality This change also provides us with an opportunity to provide a consistent upgrade process across all geodatabases. Enterprise Geodatabase, ArcSDE for SQL Express, File Geodatabase and Personal Geodatabase are all upgraded in the same manner. In order to implement this new functionality and improve the geodatabase in 9.4 it meant limiting connections to the database to 9.4 clients because the changes are too significant to allow 9.3 clients to connect to 9.4 geodatabases. We realize that users have benefited from the forward connection experience between 9.2 SP5/SP6 and 9.3 and did not make the decision to block this between 9.3 and 9.4 geodatabases lightly. We are investigating the possibility of supporting forward connections with future releases of ArcGIS.
... View more
11-17-2009
05:58 AM
|
0
|
0
|
497
|
|
POST
|
Both of these issues have been fixed and should be published soon.
... View more
11-10-2009
10:08 AM
|
0
|
0
|
612
|
|
POST
|
amallet Please contact support and log an incident with us. We can assist you in getting this request into our system.
... View more
11-06-2009
02:34 PM
|
0
|
0
|
395
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 05-21-2025 08:31 AM | |
| 3 | 05-20-2025 12:14 PM | |
| 1 | 08-29-2013 08:26 AM | |
| 1 | 08-20-2014 11:38 AM | |
| 1 | 09-05-2013 09:03 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
2 weeks ago
|