Latest Contributions by EdwardBlair

‎08-30-2017

Joe - Thanks much for the response! My issue isn't about symbolization but rather about resolving domains defined at the subtype level. If this is a gap, then it seems like a pretty big one. But we'll muddle through. And, yes, this is the Ed you're thinking of. Who wouldn't want to program if you've got the opportunity? Thanks again, Ed Blair

‎08-30-2017

I'm probably missing something, but is there support for subtypes and subtype-specific domains in the runtime Geodatabase? From what I see if a field has a domain assigned at the class level that domain assignment is respected, but I don't see anything that is aware of a domain assigned at a subtype level. Any info would be much appreciated. Thanks, Ed

‎08-17-2017

Nagma - Just tried this again, but this time with a feature class added to my map. This time the .locb file got generated. When generating the runtime content I excluded the GIS data, but it seems that generating runtime content for a locator still wants to have some data in the map. Ed

‎08-17-2017

Nagma - I just tried this and the process completes, but no .locb file is created. Ed

‎08-17-2017

Nagma - Thanks for the reply. And no, I have not created a .locb file. More details would be appreciated. Thx

‎08-17-2017

Am trying to create a LocalLocatorTask using a composite locator. This works when I use it in ArcMap. But when providing the .loc file to Runtime I get the error "One or more of the locator's properties is invalid". Are there Runtime-specific requirements for locators? Code is below. Any insights would be much appreciated. Ed private void SetupLocator() { try { string locatorPath = @"C:\GISData\Data\Snapshot\CompositeStreetLocator.loc"; _locatorTask = new Esri.ArcGISRuntime.Tasks.Geocoding.LocalLocatorTask(locatorPath); } catch (Exception ex) { this.Log.LogException(ex); } }

‎03-19-2017

Am trying to fine tune dimension feature display and behavior and see on the "Dimension Style Properties" dialog within the "Arrow Fit" group box an option to "Point inward when a tolerance is reached". I tried this on a sample style with a tolerance value of 10 -- not knowing otherwise what the tolerance meant. Creating dimensions with this style produced no text at all. I can't seem to find any documentation on this option at all. If anyone can offer insights on what this is supposed to do, that would be much appreciated. Thanks, Ed

‎02-22-2017

Found my solution. Just added System.Data.SQLite to my project and performed a query directly to the SQLite database to get the indexes present. Ed string dataSource = @"c:\MyDatabase.geodatabase"; SQLiteConnection sqlCon = new SQLiteConnection("Data Source=" + dataSource + ";Version=3;"); sqlCon.Open(); string sqlQuery = "Select sql FROM SQLite_master WHERE type = 'index' AND tbl_name = 'MYTABLE'"; SQLiteCommand sqlCmd = new SQLiteCommand(sqlQuery, sqlCon); SQLiteDataReader sqlRead = sqlCmd.ExecuteReader(); string result = ""; while (sqlRead.Read()) { result += sqlRead[0].ToString() + Environment.NewLine; }

‎02-21-2017

Am working with a (SQLite) runtime Geodatabase with an app that relies on the presence of several attribute indexes to provide good performance. Is there a way in the ArcGIS runtime .net SDK to detect the presence of an index so I can take some action if its not there? Thanks, Ed

‎07-29-2016

Actually, in some cases yes. I copied the feature class into another Geodatabase and the ArcCatalog reported count matched the expected count. However if I copied the entire Geodatabase to another Geodatabase it did not resolve the issue. In my case I was able to re-populate the class from scratch. So I truncated the contents. Found the count to be 0 (thank goodness) and executed steps to reload the class. After which the reported and actual feature counts matched. Thanks for the reply! Ed

‎07-25-2016

Dan - Thanks much for the suggestion. Sounded reasonable so I tried it, including the option to delete features with NULL geometries. No difference though. Also closed and re-opened ArcCatalog after the "repair" to make sure nothing was cached. Still the same "double" count. Ed

‎07-25-2016

Have got a file geodatabase with a number of classes. One of them, named P_Service, when clicked on in ArcCatalog reports there are 167,876 when in fact there are 83,938 features. At least when I click "Move to End" there are 83,938 features present. And that's what I expect, 83,938. Any reason why ArcCatalog would be telling me the class has got twice as many records as are actually present? Any comments/suggestions would be much appreciated. Thx Ed

‎05-27-2016

I'm adding an ArcGISDynamicMapServiceLayer layer to my map that points to a LocalMapService based on a map package that contains a standalone table. I can get references to all the feature layers using GetAllDetailsAsync, but this doesn't seem to return a reference to the standalone table. I could easily be missing something. Any insights would be much appreciated. Thanks, Ed

‎08-12-2015

Have tried using PerfQAnalyzer to look at performance and it looks useful. However, I'm looking for documentation that would help make sure I'm interpreting the results correctly and I can't find this. Anyone know of where I might find a document that would describe how to interpret PerQAnalyzer results? Thanks, Ed

‎05-18-2015

Ahhh! Yes, I see now. Thanks much for the clarification! Ed

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	2 weeks ago

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by EdwardBlair

Re: Subtypes in runtime Geodatabases

Subtypes in runtime Geodatabases

Re: LocalLocatorTask "one or more of the locator's properties is invalid"

Re: LocalLocatorTask "one or more of the locator's properties is invalid"

Re: LocalLocatorTask "one or more of the locator's properties is invalid"

LocalLocatorTask "one or more of the locator's properties is invalid"

Dimension feature style "arrow fit" tolerance

Re: Detecting the presence of an attribute index on a runtime geodatabase class

Detecting the presence of an attribute index on a runtime geodatabase class

Re: File Geodatabase feature class reports more features than are actually present

Re: File Geodatabase feature class reports more features than are actually present

File Geodatabase feature class reports more features than are actually present

Accessing a Map Package standalone table

PerfQAnalyzer - Interpreting Results

Re: RequestShapeAsync for Drawshape LineSegment

Duplicating ConductorDetail rows on a Split

Cross Bores in the UPDM

Re: Apply Asset Package errors with "OID-based rel...

Re: Apply Asset Package errors with "OID-based rel...

Re: Gas CP Subnetwork Controllers