|
POST
|
Please note, I'm aware of the documentation that describes fetching features from an element -- and that describes many other cool utility network functions as well. What I can't seem to find is the process to go in the other direction -- that is, get network element(s) from a given feature. Thx, Ed
... View more
12-28-2018
06:44 AM
|
0
|
9
|
3826
|
|
POST
|
Am assuming (but don't really know) that there is an equivalent in ArcGIS Pro/Utility Network to the Geometric Network for getting network elements from a selected feature. There don't seem to be classes like ISimpleEdgeFeature or ISimpleJunctionFeature that subclass Feature. And there doesn't seem to be anything like a GetNetworkElement() member on the Feature class. But I suspect there is *some* way to do this. If someone could point me in a direction here, that would be much appreciated. Thx, Ed
... View more
12-27-2018
05:58 PM
|
1
|
10
|
4656
|
|
POST
|
I now have one utility network dataset in a SQLExpress instance - this one has pipeline and structure domains. Will it be OK if I create another utility network dataset in the same instance - the new one to have an electric and structure domains? These datasets will cover different geographies and have different spatial references. What I'm concerned about is the structure domains. Will there be a naming conflict for the two sets of structure feature classes? Any pointers would be appreciated. Thx, Ed
... View more
12-27-2018
01:45 PM
|
1
|
3
|
1608
|
|
POST
|
So... for some reason I really don't understand when I applied my asset package the subnetwork fields (systemsubnetname, pressuresubnetname and isolationsubnetname) did not get added to all of my Pipeline classes. What I did to resolve the issue was to back out all the way - removing feature services and deleting the feature dataset, then staging a new utility network and applying the same asset package. Then loaded data, configured subnetwork controllers and resolved *all* validation errors. At that point I got "Update Subnetwork" to work. A couple points: 1. The first (failed) time through I know I reordered fields in the Pipeline classes to make things more readable -- for example, moving LIFECYCLESTATUS to the top. It *may* have been the case that I changed the visibility of a critical field as well -- I don't think I did, but can't say it wasn't possible. The second time (that worked) I made no changes to Pipeline class fields at all. 2. Rather than having to resolve *all* validation errors it may have been the case that I could have set some trace barriers to isolate the "good" part of the network from the "bad" and thus followed a piecemeal approach to validation. 3. It would still be good when receiving an error message that says "Expected field could not be found" that the software would also tell you *which* field it was looking for. Got some pointers from Esri tech support along the way - for which I say "thank you"! Ed
... View more
12-27-2018
01:21 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2112
|
|
POST
|
Mark - Am curious how the CP subnetwork definition has gone. In a small test I added anodes and test points connected to steel pipe by bond wire. When I then tries to update my distribution subnetwork I got errors about finding invalid devices -- the anodes and test points. Did you somehow exclude bond wire from the distribution subnetwork? Thanks, Ed Blair
... View more
12-27-2018
07:56 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1913
|
|
POST
|
I'll try.. but I didn't change field visibility, just the field order.
... View more
12-26-2018
05:25 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2112
|
|
POST
|
For what it's worth, I re-ordered fields in the PipelineLine and PipelineDevice classes before publishing the feature service. For example, moved the LIFECYCLESTATUS field closer to the top so its easier to see. Would this make a difference? Thx, Ed
... View more
12-26-2018
04:19 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2112
|
|
POST
|
Paul - Thanks for the reply. Yes,actually it seems I can run a subnetwork trace. Ed
... View more
12-26-2018
03:19 PM
|
0
|
3
|
2112
|
|
POST
|
Created a subnetwork controller for a pipeline distribution system (a custody transfer meter), tracked down and resolved validation errors and am trying to update the subnetwork. What I get is below. The server log shows the same, somewhat cryptic error. Is there a way to find what specific field or fields the Update Subnetwork GP tool was looking for that it can't seem to find? Not sure why there is a field it can't find in the first place as I'm using the UPDM 2018 asset package as my starting place. Any pointers would be much appreciated. Thx, Ed
... View more
12-26-2018
01:09 PM
|
0
|
6
|
2285
|
|
POST
|
Totally a data error and my bad. While the junction at the end of the pipe had a life cycle status of In Service, several connection points along the pipe, where services connect, had a life cycle status of Unknown. Once this was resolved the trace completed as expected. Ed
... View more
12-24-2018
02:58 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1124
|
|
DOC
|
Forgot to update this. I must have been using an old, outdated version of the UPDM model. When I re-started from scratch using the Gas Utility Network Service 2.0 and re-loaded my data I was able to set my subnetwork controller. Ed
... View more
12-24-2018
10:43 AM
|
0
|
0
|
36233
|
|
POST
|
Have been wrestling with this one for a while with no progress, so figure its time to ask. I've got a gas distribution network with a network controller defined at a Meter/Customer Transfer device. When I run the "Update Subnetwork" GP tool it completes successfully but the resulting Subnet line stops just a few pipe segments below the controller at what seems to be an innocuous junction - a ConnectionPoint/ConnectionPoint. Here's what it looks like. Also, the trace proceeds through a junction with similar properties at an upstream segment. The junction *is* connected to the network: The junction *is* In Service: Any suggestions or pointers would be much appreciated. Thx, Ed
... View more
12-24-2018
06:04 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1283
|
|
POST
|
This seems like a bug, but I may be missing something. Here are the steps I follow: 1. Change to a new version in my published utility network service. 2. Find I want to attempt a change that requires network topology to be disabled. 3. Execute the "Disable Network Topology" GP tool. This completes successfully. 4. Want to re-enable so I attempt to "Enable Network Topology" 5. This results in an error with the message "Operation is only supported on the DEFAULT version" 6. When I return to the DEFAULT version I see that Network Topology remains enabled, just like I left it. So it seems its possible to *disable* network topology on a version below DEFAULT but not possible to re-enable it. If I've missed something any pointers would be much appreciated. Thx, Ed
... View more
12-23-2018
10:02 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1420
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 05-14-2026 07:31 AM | |
| 1 | 05-11-2026 02:55 PM | |
| 1 | 01-07-2026 12:34 PM | |
| 1 | 01-04-2026 05:14 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
a week ago
|