|
POST
|
The GlobalID_1 field was defined as a "GlobalID". Once I removed this my "Apply Asset Package" task completed successfully. Ed
... View more
12-20-2024
08:04 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2229
|
|
POST
|
Paul - Thank you. That seems to have gotten me over that particular hump. With that change my "Apply Asset Package" process ran nearly an hour and hit the error below. Which I'm pretty sure is unrelated and merits its own question. (FWIW - I don't have editor tracking enabled in the source asset package and it doesn't seem to be enabled in the target UN dataset.) Thx Ed Adding GlobalID_1 to GISADMIN.StructureBoundary... ERROR 000852: Cannot add field GlobalID_1 to GISADMIN.StructureBoundary ERROR 002764: The field is used by Editor Tracking., The operation is not supported by this implementation. WARNING 000952: Failed to execute (AddField).
... View more
12-17-2024
05:57 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2255
|
|
POST
|
I've hit the identical error reported by BryanMay531. I've selected both domain networks. Is there a fix or work around for this? Thx, Ed
... View more
12-17-2024
12:40 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2270
|
|
POST
|
OMG. I was right in the beginning about missing something stupid. Picking the SDE connection from the right side of the dialog works as expecting. Thank you *very* much for pointing this out! Ed
... View more
12-16-2024
08:27 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1433
|
|
POST
|
Mike - Thanks for the reply. Here is what I see. No matter what type of connection file I choose I cat' get the 'OK' to enable when selecting a target geodatabase. Any suggestions would be much appreciated. Ed
... View more
12-16-2024
06:56 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1439
|
|
POST
|
Hi - I'm probably missing something stupid, but have spent half a day on this and need to ask. Trying to use the "Stage Utility Network" tool I am unable to select a Target Geodatabase. I have created a SQL*Server database and used the Create Geodatabase GP tool to create the geodatabase. I've created a user that has the ability to create Geodatabase objects -- I've tested this by creating a feature dataset and a feature class owned by this user. I've got an SDE connection file that points to this database which has the credentials of the user that can create Geodatabase objects. I can connect to this Geodatabase within the project I'm using to run the "Stage Utility Network" tool I can supply the Service Territory feature class and other parameters the tool wants. But when I try to browse for the Target Geodatabase using the SDE connection, the "OK" never enables. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thx, Ed
... View more
12-15-2024
05:37 PM
|
0
|
5
|
1502
|
|
POST
|
We are deploying an application that is leveraging sync-enabled feature services to update mobile geodatabases on user client machines. We've had to work out some kinks with mobile gdb registration and synchronization, but things seem fairly stable at this point. Our current concern is about tracking what user has synchronized when. There will be hundreds of mobile users, each of whom will be synching at different points in time. From an admin standpoint we want to know which users have data that is up-to-date and which users do not -- actually we mostly want to know about those that do not. We've considered some, admittedly kludgy, ways to do this -- like by adding a single, special purpose feature to each class or table that has the last sync table for each class. But it seems there should be information available from the parent replica database about which client has synced when. Any suggestions on how we might access replica sync history would be much appreciated. Thx, Ed
... View more
10-19-2024
08:34 AM
|
0
|
0
|
576
|
|
POST
|
For what is worth, we've found that changing symbology on a feature service is equivalent to a schema change. Seems that symbology in the mobile geodatabases is defined in a table named GDB_ServiceItems -- which I suppose Esri considers to be part of the database schema. So... in order to propagate symbology changes to mobile users we need to provide *new* mobile geodatabases produced from the updated feature service. Symbology will *not* be updated in normal synchronization.
... View more
10-19-2024
08:05 AM
|
0
|
0
|
790
|
|
POST
|
To close the loop on this, the 'fix' by wrapping the RegisterGeodatabaseAsync request within another method does seem to work after a fair bit of testing. Which is good... though it also means the vendor's product never would have worked for any previous customer. But that's another topic. Ed
... View more
10-09-2024
07:59 AM
|
0
|
0
|
794
|
|
POST
|
FWIW - Appears our vendor has been able to reproduce this issue and, we think, fix it. The 'fix' would be to wrap the awaited asynchronous RegisterGeodatabaseAsync request within another awaited asynchronous method. Which seems like they would be telling the SDK, 'wait for a response to this request, and this time I really mean it!' Not exactly sure why this would work, but it appears to in preliminary testing. Ed
... View more
10-07-2024
09:54 AM
|
0
|
0
|
820
|
|
POST
|
We are working with a mobile solution vendor that relies on ArcGIS sync-enabled feature services to replicate enterprise data to mobile devices. The services all reference non-versioned, archive-enabled feature classes in an enterprise Geodatabase. We're following the 'pre-planned' model where we create the initial 'golden' mobile geodatabases on the server and distribute these initially to all clients. The first time a mobile user connects to the server it is supposed to be 'registered' with the enterprise - obtaining a new replica ID that will subsequently be used to determine what enterprise updates need to be propagated on later "synchronize" events. Many, maybe even most times the initial registration task will succeed. Unfortunately, we've found that in a noticeable number of cases the registration does NOT succeed, meaning that subsequent synchronization will not occur. This is bad. It seems that once registration has failed, further efforts at registration will also fail. We haven't seen any pattern for registration attempts that fail versus attempts that succeed -- not to say there aren't any, we just have not seen them. The vendor says they cannot replicate the issue. No comment warranted here. Comments from anyone has experienced this, or knows anything of this behavior, would be greatly appreciated. Thx, Ed
... View more
10-05-2024
05:56 PM
|
0
|
2
|
895
|
|
POST
|
I think I found our problem.... we had inadvertently set the option to use geometry when we really did not intend to. Most feature did not fall in the display extent present when we created the replica. Will change and confirm. Ed
... View more
09-07-2024
01:37 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1209
|
|
POST
|
George - Thanks for the feedback. All edits in the parent were present in the SDE.Default version. Though I guess I need to triple-check that the replica was created from this version. We're using ArcMap version 10.6.1. And yes, I know this is old. Thx, Ed
... View more
09-07-2024
10:29 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1220
|
|
POST
|
We step up replication from a versioned production Geodatabase into versioned replica about a month ago. We haven't synchronized for several weeks. There have been thousands of edits performed in the interval. When we just recently performed a sync only a handful of features were copied to the replica. Based on a CREATED_DATE field we can easily see that some classes were not moved at all. When we set up the replica we had a DBA make a new Oracle instance and load a backup from production, so on creating the replica we simply registered all the classes - and we made sure all classes were registered. So, the question is, what could make the sync send only a handful of features when we expected many? Any insights would be much appreciated. Thx, Ed
... View more
09-06-2024
02:40 PM
|
0
|
3
|
1271
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 05-14-2026 07:31 AM | |
| 1 | 05-11-2026 02:55 PM | |
| 1 | 01-07-2026 12:34 PM | |
| 1 | 01-04-2026 05:14 PM | |
| 1 | 12-17-2025 07:45 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|